Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
Chevron paid $240 tax on 1.7 billion revenue (Read 2087 times)
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: Chevron paid $240 tax on 1.7 billion revenue
Reply #15 - Nov 10th, 2015 at 2:23pm
 
This issue of Global players paying their fair share of Tax, for business done in Australia, is one of many issues involving both Revenue & Expenditure, which must be "fairly resolved".

It must also be completed soon!

In fact, both Liberal & Labor should already have resolved this issue, quite some time ago & neither Liberal nor Labor took the action/s that were required!

That said, nor did most other Political Party's around the world, I wonder why??? 
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Its time
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Boot libs out

Posts: 25639
Gender: female
Re: Chevron paid $240 tax on 1.7 billion revenue
Reply #16 - Nov 10th, 2015 at 2:46pm
 
The rich pay all the tax
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
stunspore
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 5097
Gender: male
Re: Chevron paid $240 tax on 1.7 billion revenue
Reply #17 - Nov 10th, 2015 at 3:17pm
 
Not sure how cuts to business tax in this case actually helps.  But this is revenue and not profit.  Profit shifting is so shifty.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
crocodile
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6683
Gender: male
Re: Chevron paid $240 tax on 1.7 billion revenue
Reply #18 - Nov 10th, 2015 at 3:40pm
 
It appears that all is not quite so rosy at the ATO

http://www.afr.com/business/energy/gas/round-2-how-tough-will-tax-office-play-af...

Looks destined for the high court where interest rate arbitrage is yet to be tested. I'll take an early punt and say the ATO will pull out.
Back to top
 

Very funny Scotty, now beam down my clothes.
 
IP Logged
 
Kytro
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Blasphemy: a victimless
crime

Posts: 3409
Adelaide
Gender: male
Re: Chevron paid $240 tax on 1.7 billion revenue
Reply #19 - Nov 10th, 2015 at 4:08pm
 
Its time wrote on Nov 10th, 2015 at 2:46pm:
The rich pay all the tax


They pay a large proportion, and it still affects them less.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Kytro
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Blasphemy: a victimless
crime

Posts: 3409
Adelaide
Gender: male
Re: Chevron paid $240 tax on 1.7 billion revenue
Reply #20 - Nov 10th, 2015 at 4:14pm
 
crocodile wrote on Nov 10th, 2015 at 3:40pm:
It appears that all is not quite so rosy at the ATO

http://www.afr.com/business/energy/gas/round-2-how-tough-will-tax-office-play-af...

Looks destined for the high court where interest rate arbitrage is yet to be tested. I'll take an early punt and say the ATO will pull out.


It has to test it's new powers sometimes, might as well be now. If they do withdraw it would send a message that Australia isn't going to be enforcing transfer pricing taxation. If they go ahead and lose the case, they can argue that stronger legislation is needed.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
crocodile
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6683
Gender: male
Re: Chevron paid $240 tax on 1.7 billion revenue
Reply #21 - Nov 10th, 2015 at 4:27pm
 
Kytro wrote on Nov 10th, 2015 at 4:14pm:
crocodile wrote on Nov 10th, 2015 at 3:40pm:
It appears that all is not quite so rosy at the ATO

http://www.afr.com/business/energy/gas/round-2-how-tough-will-tax-office-play-af...

Looks destined for the high court where interest rate arbitrage is yet to be tested. I'll take an early punt and say the ATO will pull out.


It has to test it's new powers sometimes, might as well be now. If they do withdraw it would send a message that Australia isn't going to be enforcing transfer pricing taxation. If they go ahead and lose the case, they can argue that stronger legislation is needed.


It's not really about transfer pricing. They've been tested. The argument stems from the profit made with the arbitrage of interest rates between US dollars and Aussie dollars. Chevron argue that they can loan the local subsidiary in whatever currency they want. The ATO says that the tax should be payable as if it were retransacted in AUD.
Back to top
 

Very funny Scotty, now beam down my clothes.
 
IP Logged
 
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 47794
Gender: male
Re: Chevron paid $240 tax on 1.7 billion revenue
Reply #22 - Nov 10th, 2015 at 4:49pm
 
Subject to some major commitments by both major Parties there will be little tax revenue from major corporations.

The Libs were stupid enough to let a lot of experienced and skilled staff in the area of corporate taxation go. S*T*U*P*I*D* these people are now employed in large accountancy firms advising corporations how to avoid tax.

Deeming will be the only way. Deem an EBIT from revenue and deem the tax payable on that. Of course, the brainless, traitorous Libs have signed us up to the moronic TPP so that probably will be challenged in a court friendly to big corporates raping small countries.
Back to top
 

Get the vaxx! 💉💉

If you don’t like abortions ignore them like you do school shootings.
 
IP Logged
 
President Elect, The Mechanic
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17501
Gender: male
Re: Chevron paid $240 tax on 1.7 billion revenue
Reply #23 - Nov 10th, 2015 at 4:54pm
 
John Smith wrote on Nov 10th, 2015 at 8:12am:
yes but the idiots from the libs will tell us it's for our own good Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy


bullshit...

and they are not the only company either... there's hundreds of them that are not paying their way...

like in Armchairs post - get rid of all tax and put 2% on everything.... they can't escape paying tax then... no one can.. and it shares the load equally..

http://www.2gb.com/audioplayer/138551
Back to top
 

Q

The STORM has arrived
Every Dog Has Its Day...
Dark to Light.
Sheep no more.
 
IP Logged
 
Kytro
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Blasphemy: a victimless
crime

Posts: 3409
Adelaide
Gender: male
Re: Chevron paid $240 tax on 1.7 billion revenue
Reply #24 - Nov 10th, 2015 at 5:21pm
 
crocodile wrote on Nov 10th, 2015 at 4:27pm:
Kytro wrote on Nov 10th, 2015 at 4:14pm:
crocodile wrote on Nov 10th, 2015 at 3:40pm:
It appears that all is not quite so rosy at the ATO

http://www.afr.com/business/energy/gas/round-2-how-tough-will-tax-office-play-af...

Looks destined for the high court where interest rate arbitrage is yet to be tested. I'll take an early punt and say the ATO will pull out.


It has to test it's new powers sometimes, might as well be now. If they do withdraw it would send a message that Australia isn't going to be enforcing transfer pricing taxation. If they go ahead and lose the case, they can argue that stronger legislation is needed.


It's not really about transfer pricing. They've been tested. The argument stems from the profit made with the arbitrage of interest rates between US dollars and Aussie dollars. Chevron argue that they can loan the local subsidiary in whatever currency they want. The ATO says that the tax should be payable as if it were retransacted in AUD.


The article seems to be saying that the rate they charged wasn't "arm's length" and thus the difference between an arm's length rate and the rate they charged is taxable. It's less to do with the currency and more to do with if the loan was similar to borrowing from an unrelated party.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
crocodile
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6683
Gender: male
Re: Chevron paid $240 tax on 1.7 billion revenue
Reply #25 - Nov 10th, 2015 at 6:51pm
 
Kytro wrote on Nov 10th, 2015 at 5:21pm:
crocodile wrote on Nov 10th, 2015 at 4:27pm:
Kytro wrote on Nov 10th, 2015 at 4:14pm:
crocodile wrote on Nov 10th, 2015 at 3:40pm:
It appears that all is not quite so rosy at the ATO

http://www.afr.com/business/energy/gas/round-2-how-tough-will-tax-office-play-af...

Looks destined for the high court where interest rate arbitrage is yet to be tested. I'll take an early punt and say the ATO will pull out.


It has to test it's new powers sometimes, might as well be now. If they do withdraw it would send a message that Australia isn't going to be enforcing transfer pricing taxation. If they go ahead and lose the case, they can argue that stronger legislation is needed.


It's not really about transfer pricing. They've been tested. The argument stems from the profit made with the arbitrage of interest rates between US dollars and Aussie dollars. Chevron argue that they can loan the local subsidiary in whatever currency they want. The ATO says that the tax should be payable as if it were retransacted in AUD.


The article seems to be saying that the rate they charged wasn't "arm's length" and thus the difference between an arm's length rate and the rate they charged is taxable. It's less to do with the currency and more to do with if the loan was similar to borrowing from an unrelated party.


Yes, that's right. Chevron are saying the difference is due to their arbitrage activities. I'm no expert on this but I would suggest that if the ATO want to go after organisations that gain from arbitrage it will have to work both ways. That is, if the arbitrage turns out to be a loss, a deduction would be in order. The old saying, be careful what you wish for.
Back to top
 

Very funny Scotty, now beam down my clothes.
 
IP Logged
 
Its time
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Boot libs out

Posts: 25639
Gender: female
Re: Chevron paid $240 tax on 1.7 billion revenue
Reply #26 - Nov 10th, 2015 at 7:45pm
 
Bump
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bam
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 21905
Gender: male
Re: Chevron paid $240 tax on 1.7 billion revenue
Reply #27 - Nov 10th, 2015 at 8:06pm
 
Its time wrote on Nov 10th, 2015 at 2:46pm:
The rich pay avoid all the tax

Fixed it for you.  Wink
Back to top
 

You are not entitled to your opinion. You are only entitled to hold opinions that you can defend through sound, reasoned argument.
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 75207
Gender: male
Re: Chevron paid $240 tax on 1.7 billion revenue
Reply #28 - Nov 10th, 2015 at 8:22pm
 
President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Nov 10th, 2015 at 4:54pm:
John Smith wrote on Nov 10th, 2015 at 8:12am:
yes but the idiots from the libs will tell us it's for our own good Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy


bullshit...

and they are not the only company either... there's hundreds of them that are not paying their way...

like in Armchairs post - get rid of all tax and put 2% on everything.... they can't escape paying tax then... no one can.. and it shares the load equally..

http://www.2gb.com/audioplayer/138551


no bullshit about it ... which party let newscorp off a $882 million tax bill? Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Its time
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Boot libs out

Posts: 25639
Gender: female
Re: Chevron paid $240 tax on 1.7 billion revenue
Reply #29 - Nov 10th, 2015 at 8:46pm
 
John Smith wrote on Nov 10th, 2015 at 8:22pm:
President Elect, The Mechanic wrote on Nov 10th, 2015 at 4:54pm:
John Smith wrote on Nov 10th, 2015 at 8:12am:
yes but the idiots from the libs will tell us it's for our own good Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy


bullshit...

and they are not the only company either... there's hundreds of them that are not paying their way...

like in Armchairs post - get rid of all tax and put 2% on everything.... they can't escape paying tax then... no one can.. and it shares the load equally..

http://www.2gb.com/audioplayer/138551


no bullshit about it ... which party let newscorp off a $882 million tax bill? Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy


Didnt waste anytime on that one
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print