Australian Politics Forum - Potential Terrorist Exposed

greggerypeccary Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 138646 Gender:	Potential Terrorist Exposed Nov 14^th, 2015 at 8:48pm "Target the most radical sunni mosque in France and blow the whole thing up during morning prayers. kill a 1,000 of them." by, double plus good. http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1447459242/69#69
Back to top	IP Logged

double plus good Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 5693 Gender:	Re: Potential Terrorist Exposed Reply #1 - Nov 14^th, 2015 at 8:50pm YOU RIPPER, I HAVE MY OWN THREAD!!!!
Back to top	IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 106139 Melbourne Gender:	Re: Potential Terrorist Exposed Reply #2 - Nov 14^th, 2015 at 9:00pm double plus good wrote on Nov 14^th, 2015 at 8:50pm: YOU RIPPER, I HAVE MY OWN THREAD!!!! Saddam knew what to do with terrorists - he shot them by the 1000s & buried them in the desert.
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 138646 Gender:	Re: Potential Terrorist Exposed Reply #3 - Nov 14^th, 2015 at 9:02pm Two potential terrorists exposed.
Back to top	IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 106139 Melbourne Gender:	Re: Potential Terrorist Exposed Reply #4 - Nov 14^th, 2015 at 9:03pm We didn't have all these problems when Saddam was running the show because: he knew what to do
Back to top	IP Logged

Sprintcyclist Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 40763 Gender:	Re: Potential Terrorist Exposed Reply #5 - Nov 14^th, 2015 at 9:08pm double plus good wrote on Nov 14^th, 2015 at 8:50pm: YOU RIPPER, I HAVE MY OWN THREAD!!!! Well done double,
Back to top	Modern Classic Right Wing IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 138646 Gender:	Re: Potential Terrorist Exposed Reply #6 - Nov 14^th, 2015 at 9:28pm Three.
Back to top	IP Logged

issuevoter

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 9200
The Great State of Mind
Gender: male

Re: Potential Terrorist Exposed
Reply #7 - Nov 14^th, 2015 at 10:45pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14^th, 2015 at 8:48pm:

"Target the most radical sunni mosque in France and blow the whole thing up during morning prayers. kill a 1,000 of them."

by, double plus good.

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1447459242/69#69

No doubt more people are thinking along those lines today. The French police will be out in force to protect Muzzlims. But even the police must be starting to question the policies of appeasement, and the endless platitudes from their political leaders after each new Muzzlim atrocity.

Back to top

No political allegiance. No philosophy. No religion.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 138646
Gender: male

Re: Potential Terrorist Exposed
Reply #8 - Nov 15^th, 2015 at 8:37am

issuevoter wrote on Nov 14^th, 2015 at 10:45pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14^th, 2015 at 8:48pm:

"Target the most radical sunni mosque in France and blow the whole thing up during morning prayers. kill a 1,000 of them."

by, double plus good.

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1447459242/69#69

No doubt more people are thinking along those lines today.

One could hardly call it 'thinking'.

However, you're right: there will be lots of little double pluses and Sir Boobies planning their own terrorist attacks today.

Back to top

« Last Edit: Nov 15^th, 2015 at 8:59am by greggerypeccary »

IP Logged

polite_gandalf Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 20027 Canberra Gender:	Re: Potential Terrorist Exposed Reply #9 - Nov 15^th, 2015 at 8:56am Interesting, an eerily similar conversation was overheard in the streets of Raqqa a few weeks before the attacks - when coalition airstrikes were slaughtering women and children: "target the French capital - slaughter them in the streets as they do to us" Clearly we in the west hold the moral high ground here.
Back to top	A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said: Quote: Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms. IP Logged

issuevoter

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 9200
The Great State of Mind
Gender: male

Re: Potential Terrorist Exposed
Reply #10 - Nov 15^th, 2015 at 10:15am

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 15^th, 2015 at 8:37am:

issuevoter wrote on Nov 14^th, 2015 at 10:45pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 14^th, 2015 at 8:48pm:

"Target the most radical sunni mosque in France and blow the whole thing up during morning prayers. kill a 1,000 of them."

by, double plus good.

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1447459242/69#69

No doubt more people are thinking along those lines today.

One could hardly call it 'thinking'.

However, you're right: there will be lots of little double pluses and Sir Boobies planning their own terrorist attacks today.

Perhaps so; its definitely time to kick some Muzzlim arse here in the West. Its the only thing they (Muzzheads) understand.

Back to top

No political allegiance. No philosophy. No religion.

IP Logged

polite_gandalf Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 20027 Canberra Gender:	Re: Potential Terrorist Exposed Reply #11 - Nov 15^th, 2015 at 10:26am Great idea Issue - lets do the one thing the terrorists are desperately trying to provoke us into doing
Back to top	A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said: Quote: Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms. IP Logged

Soren

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 25654
Gender: male

Re: Potential Terrorist Exposed
Reply #12 - Nov 15^th, 2015 at 10:33am

polite_gandalf wrote on Nov 15^th, 2015 at 8:56am:

Interesting, an eerily similar conversation was overheard in the streets of Raqqa a few weeks before the attacks - when coalition airstrikes were slaughtering women and children:

"target the French capital - slaughter them in the streets as they do to us"

Clearly we in the west hold the moral high ground here.

It is not at all surprising that you, a Muslim,s, would insinuate equivalence between Raqqa and ISIS on the one hand and Paris and the West on the other.

"There they are in Raqqa, going about their daily business of beheading, rape and destruction and the kuffar bombs them - for what?"

Back to top

IP Logged

polite_gandalf

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male

Re: Potential Terrorist Exposed
Reply #13 - Nov 15^th, 2015 at 10:48am

Its a cycle S that goes back a lot further. The US opened the gates of hell when they invaded Iraq. Exactly what Chief Justice Jackson described at Nuremberg as the "supreme crime" - from which all other war crimes spawn from. Before 2003 there was nothing resembling ISIS or AQ in Syria or Iraq. Women had more freedom than they had anywhere else in the middle east.

Indirectly or directly, western actions have caused the death of untold thousands of innocents in the middle east. Whether or not you believe the west should be blamed for this, it still is the reality.

Now the question here is of moral equivalence. Here we have, in response to one outrageous attack against French civilians, people calling for the indiscriminate targeting and killing of muslims in what can only be described as terrorist attacks. All I did was make the observation that I see no difference to this and what angry Syrian and Iraqis are probably thinking - after experiencing more than their fair share of western instigated attacks against civilians.

What are your thoughts to the actual topic of this thread S? Do you think the idea of blowing up 1000 muslims in their mosque sets us apart from the terrorists?

Back to top

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:

Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.

IP Logged

Soren

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 25654
Gender: male

Re: Potential Terrorist Exposed
Reply #14 - Nov 15^th, 2015 at 11:44am

polite_gandalf wrote on Nov 15^th, 2015 at 10:48am:

Its a cycle S that goes back a lot further. The US opened the gates of hell when they invaded Iraq. Exactly what Chief Justice Jackson described at Nuremberg as the "supreme crime" - from which all other war crimes spawn from. Before 2003 there was nothing resembling ISIS or AQ in Syria or Iraq. Women had more freedom than they had anywhere else in the middle east.

Indirectly or directly, western actions have caused the death of untold thousands of innocents in the middle east. Whether or not you believe the west should be blamed for this, it still is the reality.

Muslims have been killing each other for centuries without any Western interference. It is a colossal lie to say, as you do, that now they are killing each other only because of Western interference. This is a lie calculated to excuse and cover up the deep and murderous schism in Islam and its violent teachings.

Iraq and Iran fought each other in a war for 10 year in the 1980s. Saddam killed his own people, as did many other Muslim rulers, from Indonesia to Algeria. Muslims want Western interference in the Balkans when the Christians were killing the Muslims. But when the Muslims are killing the Muslims you want the West to stay away. Except when you don't. I am sure Muslims were very supportive of the US as it helped the Afghans against the Soviets. Not you and not any other Muslims was demanding then that the West stay out of it.

You are a bunch of hypocrites addled with an incurable victim mentality. Muslims are massacring people across the world but you insist on being the victims.

I am fully in favour of the West keeping out of the affairs of all Muslims countries as long as all Muslims are also keep out of all Western countries.

Back to top

IP Logged