John Smith wrote on Nov 15
th, 2015 at 8:26am:
Muttley wrote on Nov 15
th, 2015 at 8:13am:
Fixed it for ya dopey.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5528/f55286f0fb67f4d01167965b4c3a937ad64a8d65" alt="Grin Grin"
you think Abbott was a strong leader? then you're just as stupid as he was. Abbott changed his position on just about everything he announced, sometimes 2 or 3 times. Thats a weak leader, not a strong one.
The evidence tells the tale - and I have to agree with John here.
Abbott's initial resolve on free speech laws and security matters slowly melted into a wet blob on the floor as a result of constant forelock-pulling towards leaders of the Muslim community - who he 'consulted' in humiliating manner on every issue that even vaguely touched upon Islam.
He became utterly irrelevant in the end, and it was all the more shameful in hindsight after he made his speech to the British parliament where he warned against letting in yet more immigrant and refugee Muslims as they were putting European civilisation in danger of dragging it back to the Dark Ages through Islamisation.
In the end he proved to be one of the weakest prime ministers we've ever had. It was only Morrison who had kept him looking good for a while after his election to office.
The 18c racial vilification law that he was going to dump ... chickened out in the end.
The 12,000 Syrian refugees were going to be Christians and a small number of boutique little Islamic sects ... Again ... he chickened out on that.
Over and over he capitulated to lobbying from the Muslim community, until he was just a bloody useless shell of a man.