polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 2
nd, 2015 at 2:45pm:
This is a bad image for Turnbull on so many levels - not just an issue of indecisiveness in response to a clear case of misleading the Australian public, but by, of all people, the special minister of state - who is supposed to be in charge of matters of parliamentary integrity. And not only that - the minister who had very noticeably been sidelined by the previous PM, and was, very noticeably, active in the internal push to get Turnbull to replace Abbott. And not just bad judgement from any old PM - but the PM who basically gave himself the label "Mr bad judgement" after utegate. Yet its not just a case of bad judgment, it will inevitably be seen as the PM forming a protection racket for the guy who was central to delivering him the PMship. And lets not forget also how much ammunition this is giving for any dormant Abbott insurgents - who must be conjuring a lot of will power to hold their tongue on this.
Just seems very very bad for Turnbull.
Indeed. This is a potential obliteration for Turnbull. If he acts against Brough, what will Brough reveal about the machinations which went on leading up to the knifing of Abbott. Brough will have been central to all of it, and Turnbull is in his hands. He has delivered himself up to Brough, or has he? I suspect Brough will have 'photos.'
If he does not act against Brough, then he ties his ultimate fate to that of Brough, if Brough goes down, so does he especially after today's stonewalling which is in effect support for Brough. The longer he keeps Brough the more obvious the umbilical cord.
Lovely stuff....and yet ~ Abbott was smart enough to recognise the toxicity of Brough, something Turnbull failed to do, and it is not the first time he similarly failed.