Emma wrote on Nov 27^th, 2015 at 12:05am:


Yes they are skewed.  Under Law no woman can be paid for the exact same job at less than the mandatory rate.

If you can show otherwise - SHOW ME - and we cannot discuss negotiated remuneration.... ONLY where there is an assertion that a woman is paid less than the mandatory level for the job.

Looking at overall figures does not give a true reflection of the realities.

In the 2011 Census, the figures were that men worked 42 + hours a week generally compared to women working 34+ - how does the equate to any 'wage gap'? Oddly enough - a calculation  of those hours at the same rate of pay gives precisely the difference between men and women's EARNINGS - so nowhere are women missing out.

You are paid what you EARN for the hours you WORK in any given field - and in any given field NOBODY is paid less than the mandatory minimum.

Are you saying I should be paid $1500 a day consulting for driving a club bus, rather than the $27 an hour casual rate I do get?

OK.....................

Grappler Deep State Feller wrote on Nov 27^th, 2015 at 12:19am:



While ignoring that one woman dies every week from domestic violence.

One woman every week. Beaten to death.

Nobody ignores that - but we also never hear of the men killed - EVER.  Let alone the men thrown out of their homes and subjected to violence by the courts and others, including the curtailment of their opportunity to earn a decent living.

I've long said - and will continue to do so -that the current approach of blaming men regardless of facts is at the root of the escalating violence and alienation taking place between men and women - and is the direct cause of many of these killings - the ones that take place for revenge or retaliation.

In MOST cases of killings - I refer you back to the link I posted before - most such take place in drunken or drug rages, which are in most case incidents of reciprocal violence - for which women are at least as responsible as men are.

How many times must you be told that women INITIATE more incidents of violence - but suffer greater injury therefrom.

Until we, as a society, remove from women the 'right' to assault men - there can be no diminution in violence between women and men, and no reduction in the proportionately greater physical harm women receive as a result.

Am I the only one addressing the real issues of relationship violence? I think so.

Sadly, that has been 2 women per week so far this year. And that is AUSTRALIA.

I hate to even think about places like PNG, or Pakistan.

[]I avoid the term 'domestic violence' since it has been perverted to mean 'man v woman ONLY' violence by any extension of any feeling by a woman regardless of facts. [/quote]

OH  YOU avoid the term DOMESTIC VIOLENCE?

Too hard for you to grasp the reality eh?.  You cannot conceive how that comment makes me feel. No you have no clue at all.
Keep on waving the flag of male superiority.  It will not be a good outcome.

Emma wrote on Nov 27^th, 2015 at 12:31am:


Mothra didn't say that - I did.

The correct term is FAMILY violence, since 'domestic violence' has been perverted to the feminist cause...

Women kill their kids at a massively higher rate than men kill their kids - yet the focus is on men being violent....

HTS is that 'male superiority'?

mothra wrote on Nov 27^th, 2015 at 12:30am:


There was a post some time back with a reference - but I don't recall the figures and I don't keep the links etc.  It was somewhere (from memory) around 35-40% men killed in some way in 'dv' incidents. 

We're not allowed to say it - but most of those were in 'certain' groups in society.

And, when it comes to child killings and abuse, let us be sure to differentiate between Natural Parents and.... 'new lions in the pride'..... many child killings are by 'new lions' and often the natural mother - many - many more than by natural fathers.

We need to look at all the issues here - not just the approved line force fed to us, and one of those real issues is the breakdown of social structures in the pursuit of feminist hegemony in the West.

http://www.businessinsider.com.au/these-new-stats-reveal-the-horrifying-scale-of...

We need more accurate and definitive information than is handed out in these emotive releases - and until 'domestic violence' fully incorporates more than 'man on woman' - the real issues will not be addressed.

The term 'domestic violence' has become so perverted into meaning 'man v woman ONLY' that the real issues are being swept under the carpet.

That is why Rose Batty initially referred to Family Violence, but was shouted down and forced into discussion of the accepted version called 'domestic violence'.  The whole thing is politicised for a reason, that reason being to beat men into submission.

Not working, is it?