mariacostel wrote on Dec 11
th, 2015 at 9:27am:
Dnarever wrote on Dec 10
th, 2015 at 7:26pm:
mariacostel wrote on Dec 10
th, 2015 at 4:09pm:
A bugatti veyron is faster than any other car and a bus carries more people than any car. So why don't we drive either? A) is too expensive and virtually unusable while B) is overkill for getting the groceries or in fact, for anyone shy of a Sound of Music type family.
It is not about what any technology CAN do, but rather what is needed. I am still to get an even half-reasonable (not to mention accurate) reason why a residence needs super-fast broadband. Business, yes. Residences, no.
The points you are trying to make were decided 20 years ago.
Nobody on any side agrees with you. You need to just get over it,
Everyone recognises that we need fast broadband.It is just that the Libs stuffed up the assignment for stupid political reasons. Abbott could not be bipartisan on the topic so he flushed us all down the drain instead.
I would agree, but the problem is that you and your ilk think we need 100Mbs broadband in the home and I am asking you to tell me WHY. Standard NBN is the same speed as ADSL so the point of that is....?
Standard NBN is the same speed as ADSL - since when?
Does ADSL guarantee 25/12 mbps or is it up to?
I can't take you seriously as the amount of fud you spew and straw man arguments you make is astounding.
You still haven't demonstrated how copper is better than fiber in terms of cost, maintenance and performance.
If you can't demonstrate these simple things then it's obvious you have nothing.
Who says I only use the internet for Facebook?
I utilise it for a lot of different things - including business and personal.
FTTN is as expensive as FTTH - this cannot be questioned.
So we have 3 options - FTTdp, FTTP or scrap it completely.
How do you think we are going to be an innovation nation without a world class network?