Australian Politics Forum - Baden Clay wins appeal.

Aussie

Gold Member

Online

OzPolitic

Posts: 38869
Gender: male

Re: Baden Clay wins appeal.
Reply #210 - Dec 29^th, 2015 at 4:09pm

Redmond Neck wrote on Dec 29^th, 2015 at 4:03pm:

I thought I read something the other day about the prosecution not persuing some particular point hard enough in the trial. Cant recall what it was at the moment.

Therefore I would prefer a retrial to allow this, unless of course the prosecution believes they have a strong case for the appeal.

Will watch with interest.

That was ~ Baden-Clay contacted the Insurer of Allison's life after her death about her Death cover. It was referred to in the Trial and in the Court of Appeal. It is not 'new' evidence uncovered after Trial, so that renders it water under the bridge.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie Gold Member Online OzPolitic Posts: 38869 Gender:	Re: Baden Clay wins appeal. Reply #211 - Dec 29^th, 2015 at 4:11pm .
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 139949
Gender: male

Re: Baden Clay wins appeal.
Reply #212 - Dec 29^th, 2015 at 4:14pm

Aussie wrote on Dec 29^th, 2015 at 4:06pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 29^th, 2015 at 3:56pm:

It appears that Red, cods, and Fireball have all run for the hills.

Thanks, Aussie, for ruining yet another thread by providing clearly thought out, logical arguments based on facts and readily available evidence that proves your point beyond all doubt, and completely shoots down the "arguments" of those who rely solely on ACA, 60 Minutes, and talk-back radio gossip.

You bastard.

No need to thank me. It's what I learned at Graffiti School, the graduates of which Lord Herbert finds offensive because they are always ruining his Threads with cold hard facts as well.

I can certainly understand Herbert's frustration.

In his (Walter Mitty) world, all that matters is bigotry, misogyny, sexism, racism, irrational fear, hatred, and Islamophobia.

I'm sure that facts are very confronting for him.

Poor dear.

Back to top

IP Logged

Redmond Neck

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 21747
ACT
Gender: male

Re: Baden Clay wins appeal.
Reply #213 - Dec 29^th, 2015 at 4:19pm

Aussie wrote on Dec 29^th, 2015 at 4:09pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Dec 29^th, 2015 at 4:03pm:

I thought I read something the other day about the prosecution not persuing some particular point hard enough in the trial. Cant recall what it was at the moment.

Therefore I would prefer a retrial to allow this, unless of course the prosecution believes they have a strong case for the appeal.

Will watch with interest.

That was ~ Baden-Clay contacted the Insurer of Allison's life after her death about her Death cover. It was referred to in the Trial and in the Court of Appeal. It is not 'new' evidence uncovered after Trial, so that renders it water under the bridge.

Yeah I think that was it he contacted her life insurer on more than one occasion cant recall exactly when, but to me made him look guilty. (Of something I guess is the current point)

Back to top

BAN ALL THESE ABO SITES RECOGNITIONS.

ALL AUSTRALIA IS FOR ALL AUSTRALIANS!

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Online

OzPolitic

Posts: 38869
Gender: male

Re: Baden Clay wins appeal.
Reply #214 - Dec 29^th, 2015 at 4:22pm

Redmond Neck wrote on Dec 29^th, 2015 at 4:19pm:

Aussie wrote on Dec 29^th, 2015 at 4:09pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Dec 29^th, 2015 at 4:03pm:

I thought I read something the other day about the prosecution not persuing some particular point hard enough in the trial. Cant recall what it was at the moment.

Therefore I would prefer a retrial to allow this, unless of course the prosecution believes they have a strong case for the appeal.

Will watch with interest.

That was ~ Baden-Clay contacted the Insurer of Allison's life after her death about her Death cover. It was referred to in the Trial and in the Court of Appeal. It is not 'new' evidence uncovered after Trial, so that renders it water under the bridge.

Yeah I think that was it he contacted her life insurer on more than one occasion cant recall exactly when, but to me made him look guilty

The Prosecutor (correctly in my view) did not attempt to push it as proof of anything other than the fact he made the contact, and that he did was not hidden from the Jury.

Back to top

IP Logged

Alinta

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1470
Melbourne
Gender: female

Re: Baden Clay wins appeal.
Reply #215 - Dec 29^th, 2015 at 4:23pm

Redmond Neck wrote on Dec 29^th, 2015 at 4:03pm:

I thought I read something the other day about the prosecution not persuing some particular point hard enough in the trial. Cant recall what it was at the moment.

Therefore I would prefer a retrial to allow this, unless of course the prosecution believes they have a strong case for the appeal.

Will watch with interest.

Had there been grounds to support it, the Appeal Court could have ordered a retrial and I expect would have done so.

Indeed, I too will be watching with interest.........in fact I'm itching to scrutinise the grounds for appeal to the High Court....

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 139949
Gender: male

Re: Baden Clay wins appeal.
Reply #216 - Dec 29^th, 2015 at 4:24pm

Redmond Neck wrote on Dec 29^th, 2015 at 4:19pm:

but to me made him look guilty

Look guilty?

What are you talking about? He is guilty.

On ACA and 60 Minutes they showed grainy footage of him walking out of his house in slow motion with menacing music playing over the top.

Moreover, 99% of people who call talk-back radio shows say that he's guilty.

Confronted with evidence like that, how can there possibly be any doubt in your mind?

Seriously?

Back to top

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: Baden Clay wins appeal.
Reply #217 - Dec 29^th, 2015 at 4:29pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 29^th, 2015 at 4:14pm:

Aussie wrote on Dec 29^th, 2015 at 4:06pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 29^th, 2015 at 3:56pm:

It appears that Red, cods, and Fireball have all run for the hills.

Thanks, Aussie, for ruining yet another thread by providing clearly thought out, logical arguments based on facts and readily available evidence that proves your point beyond all doubt, and completely shoots down the "arguments" of those who rely solely on ACA, 60 Minutes, and talk-back radio gossip.

You bastard.

No need to thank me. It's what I learned at Graffiti School, the graduates of which Lord Herbert finds offensive because they are always ruining his Threads with cold hard facts as well.

I can certainly understand Herbert's frustration.

In his (Walter Mitty) world, all that matters is bigotry, misogyny, sexism, racism, irrational fear, hatred, and Islamophobia.

I'm sure that facts are very confronting for him.

Poor dear.

can only presume hateful ugly relationships is closed for the day..

so therefore we have gweggy and numpty with their usual patronising miserable personal comments...

that invariably wreck most threads....

graffiti school we have known that for a long time... Roll Eyes

good job you too have each other....

how many have you dobbed on today...I am sure you are keeping count....

Back to top

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: Baden Clay wins appeal.
Reply #218 - Dec 29^th, 2015 at 4:32pm

Alinta wrote on Dec 29^th, 2015 at 4:23pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Dec 29^th, 2015 at 4:03pm:

I thought I read something the other day about the prosecution not persuing some particular point hard enough in the trial. Cant recall what it was at the moment.

Therefore I would prefer a retrial to allow this, unless of course the prosecution believes they have a strong case for the appeal.

Will watch with interest.

Had there been grounds to support it, the Appeal Court could have ordered a retrial and I expect would have done so.

Indeed, I too will be watching with interest.........in fact I'm itching to scrutinise the grounds for appeal to the High Court....

hey alinta numpty will be very disappointed in you.... you are supposed to be very very supportive of this Appeal ruling...

numpty has already scrutinised...and given his verdict...

nothing more to be said.. Angry

Back to top

IP Logged

The Heartless Felon Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 2869 Gender:	Re: Baden Clay wins appeal. Reply #219 - Dec 29^th, 2015 at 4:34pm I suppose we should be thankful that the hysteria went into recess over xmas...
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 139949
Gender: male

Re: Baden Clay wins appeal.
Reply #220 - Dec 29^th, 2015 at 4:34pm

cods wrote on Dec 29^th, 2015 at 4:32pm:

Alinta wrote on Dec 29^th, 2015 at 4:23pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Dec 29^th, 2015 at 4:03pm:

I thought I read something the other day about the prosecution not persuing some particular point hard enough in the trial. Cant recall what it was at the moment.

Therefore I would prefer a retrial to allow this, unless of course the prosecution believes they have a strong case for the appeal.

Will watch with interest.

Had there been grounds to support it, the Appeal Court could have ordered a retrial and I expect would have done so.

Indeed, I too will be watching with interest.........in fact I'm itching to scrutinise the grounds for appeal to the High Court....

hey alinta numpty will be very disappointed in you.... you are supposed to be very very supportive of this Appeal ruling...

numpty has already scrutinised...and given his verdict...

nothing more to be said.. Angry

No, he hasn't.

Why do you have to continually lie?

Back to top

IP Logged

Alinta

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 1470
Melbourne
Gender: female

Re: Baden Clay wins appeal.
Reply #221 - Dec 29^th, 2015 at 4:38pm

Aussie wrote on Dec 29^th, 2015 at 4:09pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Dec 29^th, 2015 at 4:03pm:

I thought I read something the other day about the prosecution not persuing some particular point hard enough in the trial. Cant recall what it was at the moment.

Therefore I would prefer a retrial to allow this, unless of course the prosecution believes they have a strong case for the appeal.

Will watch with interest.

That was ~ Baden-Clay contacted the Insurer of Allison's life after her death about her Death cover. It was referred to in the Trial and in the Court of Appeal. It is not 'new' evidence uncovered after Trial, so that renders it water under the bridge.

As you are in Qld, are you able to clarify anything about current articles suggesting Baden -Clay contacted Allison's life insurer a couple of days before her death????

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Online

OzPolitic

Posts: 38869
Gender: male

Re: Baden Clay wins appeal.
Reply #222 - Dec 29^th, 2015 at 4:40pm

Alinta wrote on Dec 29^th, 2015 at 4:38pm:

Aussie wrote on Dec 29^th, 2015 at 4:09pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Dec 29^th, 2015 at 4:03pm:

I thought I read something the other day about the prosecution not persuing some particular point hard enough in the trial. Cant recall what it was at the moment.

Therefore I would prefer a retrial to allow this, unless of course the prosecution believes they have a strong case for the appeal.

Will watch with interest.

That was ~ Baden-Clay contacted the Insurer of Allison's life after her death about her Death cover. It was referred to in the Trial and in the Court of Appeal. It is not 'new' evidence uncovered after Trial, so that renders it water under the bridge.

As you are in Qld, are you able to clarify anything about current articles suggesting Baden -Clay contacted Allison's life insurer a couple of days before her death????

Link.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie Gold Member Online OzPolitic Posts: 38869 Gender:	Re: Baden Clay wins appeal. Reply #223 - Dec 29^th, 2015 at 4:41pm Yuck! Bloody pay wall. It was a Courier Mail article. Maybe you can get around the wall.
Back to top	IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: Baden Clay wins appeal.
Reply #224 - Dec 29^th, 2015 at 4:42pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 29^th, 2015 at 3:26pm:

cods wrote on Dec 29^th, 2015 at 3:22pm:

here we go..Aussie wrote on Dec 29^th, 2015 at 1:31pm:

I wonder if cods et al will accept the decision if the High Court (should there be an appeal ~ as opposed to yet another schmedia report there might be one) also concludes that a manslaughter conviction was the only one open, on the evidence?

the answer is NO......because it should go back to court..IMO.

It did, cods.

How many times do you need to be told?

I ONLY SAW .......DRUM ROLL

ONE TRIAL....

SHOW ME WHERE THERE WAS ANOTHER..

YOU SEE THE COURT OF APPEAL IS NOT WHAT I PRESUME TO be a TRIAL.......

it can up and change the charges to whatever they see as law......just for the few... of course... numpty being one of them... hilarious.

CHANGE THE CHARGES..[highlight].REALLY?
[/highlight]

HE WAS EITHER FOUND GUILTY BY A FAIR TRIAL... OR HE WAS NOT GIVEN A FAIR TRIAL...

;LETS DO IT AGAIN....

as it is MANSLAUGHTER doesnt carry half the stigma of a MURDERER....

in fact they are trying to make it look very much as if Alison/..ASKED FOR IT????....

you dont agree thats fine... please dont use my id again in this case... because i dont want to be banned...

you and numpty can think what you like.. I am not interested ..

I am now going to read alintas LINK word for word.

Back to top

IP Logged