Kytro wrote on Dec 8^th, 2015 at 2:16pm:


Which is beside the point.

The problem is there was a [highlight]plausible alternative explanation, which gives rise to reasonable doubt. That's how it works.  [[/highlight]/quote]



I like it...


when you kill someone there is always an alternative explanation..

you mean

apart from someone being DEAD of course.

or maybe.. APPEARING TO BE DEAD>

should that be ALLEGEDLY DEAD... just to be safe..

its hard to tell these days...

by the time some are finished with the system... we end up owing them.......and they come out HEROs..

gosh I hadnt looked at it that way..

he didnt want her to go to the  Real Estate conference where his mistress would be...?????....

what does INTENT MEAN....does it mean you have to intend doing the person harm before you challenge them...?? which would be almost impossible to prove unless you found a plan they "intended" to work too..

does DOMESTIC VIOLENCE rear its head in these cases??????????......



if he didnt intend to KILL her.. did he intend to cause her any harm at all...

or did she manage to fall all by herself.. and who knows maybe did herself harm at the bridge before she fell over it.....

the DIckie family must be devastated   they would have looked into this blokes eyes....and seen the coldness...

to have play acted like he did before she was found... would take some cold bastard thats for sure....


somehow Allison will be all but forgotten now whilst his miserable lawyers fight for his lousy release...

one thing nef he wont be able to hide will he..and they can keep him in Qld... see where there been  another murder suicide up there..


alive one day dead the next...an 11 year old allegedly  killed by her mother..

CRIMINAL CODE - SECT 302
302 Definition of murder

(1) Except as hereinafter set forth, a person who unlawfully kills another under any of the following circumstances, that is to say—

    (a) if the offender intends to cause the death of the person killed or that of some other person or if the offender intends to do to the person killed or to some other person some grievous bodily harm;

    (b) if death is caused by means of an act done in the prosecution of an unlawful purpose, which act is of such a nature as to be likely to endanger human life;

    (c) if the offender intends to do grievous bodily harm to some person for the purpose of facilitating the commission of a crime which is such that the offender may be arrested without warrant, or for the purpose of facilitating the flight of an offender who has committed or attempted to commit any such crime;

    (d) if death is caused by administering any stupefying or overpowering thing for either of the purposes mentioned in paragraph (c);

    (e) if death is caused by wilfully stopping the breath of any person for either of such purposes;

is guilty of murder.

(2) Under subsection (1)(a) it is immaterial that the offender did not intend to hurt the particular person who is killed.

(3) Under subsection (1)(b) it is immaterial that the offender did not intend to hurt any person.

(4) Under subsection (1)(c) to (e) it is immaterial that the offender did not intend to cause death or did not know that death was likely to result.

Kytro wrote on Dec 8^th, 2015 at 4:24pm:



WHY entitled Kytro??.....

we have sick people begging for medication they cannot afford.......

they too are Australian citizens..

yet are they not amongst those who are l ENTITLED.. to everything thats FREE...

I am just asking..

Baden-Clay qwas found guilty by a jury of his peers of murder.

Now a panel of 3 Judges have set aside that Murder verdict and called it Manslaughter.

You see......this is where the JUSTICE SYSTEM falls down in a heap of its own faeces.

I have listened to the reasons why the Judges set the decision aside.

If a Jury did that they would be bludgeoned by the Judge and give directions to think it along other lines.

Amongst the reasons, "there were no reasons why Baden-Clay would have done it because of his financial hardship...BULLSH.T!!!!!!!!"

The scratches on his face have no bearing on the case...BULLSH.T!!!!!!!!!!

And that is only the thirty second grab I got from the news.



This is crap...Baden-Clay Murdered her..A jury said so and 3 Judges have decided not so.

This is why people view the legal system as a load of sh.t....which in this case...it is!!!!!!!!!!

Baden-Clay qwas found guilty by a jury of his peers of murder.

Now a panel of 3 Judges have set aside that Murder verdict and called it Manslaughter.

You see......this is where the JUSTICE SYSTEM falls down in a heap of its own faeces.

I have listened to the reasons why the Judges set the decision aside.

If a Jury did that they would be bludgeoned by the Judge and give directions to think it along other lines.

Amongst the reasons, "there were no reasons why Baden-Clay would have done it because of his financial hardship...BULLSH.T!!!!!!!!"

The scratches on his face have no bearing on the case...BULLSH.T!!!!!!!!!!

And that is only the thirty second grab I got from the news.



This is crap...Baden-Clay Murdered her..A jury said so and 3 Judges have decided not so.

This is why people view the legal system as a load of sh.t....which in this case...it is!!!!!!!!!!

Word of warning!

DONT TAKE ANY NOTICE OF A FAILED  LAWYER!

IGNORE IS THE GENERAL ADVICE!

I have followed this case closely since it surfaced.

I stand by my comments, every syllable of them!

Trust you to stand with the Judges, as predictable as nightfall.