Australian Politics Forum - Baden Clay wins appeal.

red baron Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 10204 Blue Mountains Gender:	Re: Baden Clay wins appeal. Reply #45 - Dec 8^th, 2015 at 5:54pm Eat it Aussie..When the Legal System f....ks it up royally they hide behind a wall of freaking words. Which is exactly what is happening with this scenario. Tell you what Aussie, why don't you stick the judgement where the sun doesn't shine...because that is exactly where it belongs. It reeks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Back to top	IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38867
Gender: male

Re: Baden Clay wins appeal.
Reply #46 - Dec 8^th, 2015 at 5:59pm

red baron wrote on Dec 8^th, 2015 at 5:54pm:

Eat it Aussie..When the Legal System f....ks it up royally they hide behind a wall of freaking words.

Which is exactly what is happening with this scenario.

Tell you what Aussie, why don't you stick the judgement where the sun doesn't shine...because that is exactly where it belongs. It reeks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I'm pretty certain that where the Sun does not shine on my body probably does reek, as you assert. I hope it does as I do not fart perfume or crap ice-cream. That takes us nowhere other than to provide yet another example of how you debate in pretty pathetic cliches.

So, I guess you are being highly critical of a Judgement you have not read.

That's pretty silly.

Back to top

IP Logged

Neferti

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 7965
Canberra
Gender: female

Re: Baden Clay wins appeal.
Reply #47 - Dec 8^th, 2015 at 6:06pm

Aussie wrote on Dec 8^th, 2015 at 5:59pm:

red baron wrote on Dec 8^th, 2015 at 5:54pm:

Eat it Aussie..When the Legal System f....ks it up royally they hide behind a wall of freaking words.

Which is exactly what is happening with this scenario.

Tell you what Aussie, why don't you stick the judgement where the sun doesn't shine...because that is exactly where it belongs. It reeks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I'm pretty certain that where the Sun does not shine on my body probably does reek, as you assert. I hope it does as I do not fart perfume or crap ice-cream. That takes us nowhere other than to provide yet another example of how you debate in pretty pathetic cliches.

So, I guess you are being highly critical of a Judgement you have not read.

That's pretty silly

You really do NOT get it, do you, arsie. Red Baron HAS read the Judgement, have you?

The rest of your idiotic post referring to farting, perfume, crap, and icecream just shows what a nob you are. Angry

Back to top

IP Logged

red baron

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 10204
Blue Mountains
Gender: male

Re: Baden Clay wins appeal.
Reply #48 - Dec 8^th, 2015 at 6:07pm

I have read on the case as it unfolded.

I am not interested in 3 Judges' coloured versions of the laws as they see it.

If you want to stand for the Judges then that is your prerogative.

Me...think I'd rather go vomit in the corner than listen to what those verbalistic idiots have got to say.

I have heard the facts unfold for the duration of the case.

If I was on a Jury I would hang the prick.

Back to top

IP Logged

Neferti

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 7965
Canberra
Gender: female

Re: Baden Clay wins appeal.
Reply #49 - Dec 8^th, 2015 at 6:17pm

red baron wrote on Dec 8^th, 2015 at 6:07pm:

I have read on the case as it unfolded.

I am not interested in 3 Judges' coloured versions of the laws as they see it.

If you want to stand for the Judges then that is your prerogative.

Me...think I'd rather go vomit in the corner than listen to what those verbalistic idiots have got to say.

I have heard the facts unfold for the duration of the case.

If I was on a Jury I would hang the prick.

AGREED, Red Baron. Observe my post just before yours. Arsie is forgetting about the immediate family, workmates, plus what the public think when somebody is murdered .... KILLED in a RAGE by a partner. Who now says it "musta been an accident, and I know nutting". Prick is the word. Let's hope that he still gets LIFE. Wink

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38867
Gender: male

Re: Baden Clay wins appeal.
Reply #50 - Dec 8^th, 2015 at 6:26pm

red baron wrote on Dec 8^th, 2015 at 6:07pm:

I have read on the case as it unfolded.

I am not interested in 3 Judges' coloured versions of the laws as they see it.

If you want to stand for the Judges then that is your prerogative.

Me...think I'd rather go vomit in the corner than listen to what those verbalistic idiots have got to say.

I have heard the facts unfold for the duration of the case.

If I was on a Jury I would hang the prick.

Have you read the Judgement of today Mr Baron. That is a very simple question.

Back to top

IP Logged

Redmond Neck Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 21747 ACT Gender:	Re: Baden Clay wins appeal. Reply #51 - Dec 8^th, 2015 at 6:28pm Red, my advice is ignore the failed lawyer dickhead!
Back to top	BAN ALL THESE ABO SITES RECOGNITIONS. ALL AUSTRALIA IS FOR ALL AUSTRALIANS! IP Logged

Aussie Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 38867 Gender:	Re: Baden Clay wins appeal. Reply #52 - Dec 8^th, 2015 at 6:30pm Redmond Neck wrote on Dec 8^th, 2015 at 6:28pm: Red, my advice is ignore the failed lawyer dickhead! Who are you referring to? Can't be me on either ground.
Back to top	IP Logged

Aussie Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 38867 Gender:	Re: Baden Clay wins appeal. Reply #53 - Dec 8^th, 2015 at 6:40pm For those who would like to read the Judgement (so that their criticism/comments is/are relevant) here is the.....: Link.
Back to top	IP Logged

Neferti Gold Member Offline Posts: 7965 Canberra Gender:	Re: Baden Clay wins appeal. Reply #54 - Dec 8^th, 2015 at 6:47pm Aussie wrote on Dec 8^th, 2015 at 6:40pm: For those who would like to read the Judgement (so that their criticism/comments is/are relevant) here is the.....: Link. We have already read the Judgement. It was posted several pages back, do try to keep up, arsie.
Back to top	IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38867
Gender: male

Re: Baden Clay wins appeal.
Reply #55 - Dec 8^th, 2015 at 7:20pm

Neferti wrote on Dec 8^th, 2015 at 6:47pm:

Aussie wrote on Dec 8^th, 2015 at 6:40pm:

For those who would like to read the Judgement (so that their criticism/comments is/are relevant) here is the.....:

Link.

We have already read the Judgement. It was posted several pages back, do try to keep up, arsie.

Roll Eyes

Yeas, and by me....in the very OP of mine. Which part of the Judgement (please quote the relevant parts) do you disagree with?

Mr R Baron, have you read the Judgement?

Back to top

IP Logged

Sprintcyclist

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 40780
Gender: male

Re: Baden Clay wins appeal.
Reply #56 - Dec 8^th, 2015 at 7:29pm

Neferti wrote on Dec 8^th, 2015 at 6:17pm:

red baron wrote on Dec 8^th, 2015 at 6:07pm:

I have read on the case as it unfolded.

I am not interested in 3 Judges' coloured versions of the laws as they see it.

If you want to stand for the Judges then that is your prerogative.

Me...think I'd rather go vomit in the corner than listen to what those verbalistic idiots have got to say.

I have heard the facts unfold for the duration of the case.

If I was on a Jury I would hang the prick.

AGREED, Red Baron. Observe my post just before yours. Arsie is forgetting about the immediate family, workmates, plus what the public think when somebody is murdered .... KILLED in a RAGE by a partner. Who now says it "musta been an accident, and I know nutting". Prick is the word. Let's hope that he still gets LIFE. ;)

I agree

Back to top

Modern Classic Right Wing

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38867
Gender: male

Re: Baden Clay wins appeal.
Reply #57 - Dec 8^th, 2015 at 7:38pm

Sprintcyclist wrote on Dec 8^th, 2015 at 7:29pm:

Neferti wrote on Dec 8^th, 2015 at 6:17pm:

red baron wrote on Dec 8^th, 2015 at 6:07pm:

I have read on the case as it unfolded.

I am not interested in 3 Judges' coloured versions of the laws as they see it.

If you want to stand for the Judges then that is your prerogative.

Me...think I'd rather go vomit in the corner than listen to what those verbalistic idiots have got to say.

I have heard the facts unfold for the duration of the case.

If I was on a Jury I would hang the prick.

AGREED, Red Baron. Observe my post just before yours. Arsie is forgetting about the immediate family, workmates, plus what the public think when somebody is murdered .... KILLED in a RAGE by a partner. Who now says it "musta been an accident, and I know nutting". Prick is the word. Let's hope that he still gets LIFE. ;)

I agree

Great. Explain why, given he did not intend to kill.

Back to top

IP Logged

Neferti

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 7965
Canberra
Gender: female

Re: Baden Clay wins appeal.
Reply #58 - Dec 8^th, 2015 at 8:00pm

Aussie wrote on Dec 8^th, 2015 at 7:38pm:

Great. Explain why, given he did not intend to kill.

Get with the Plan arsie, Gerard Baden-ClaY hasn't said he did anything, he is INNOCENT, remember?

He has no idea why his wife's DNA was found in his car, or how she ended up in that river bed. It's NOT his fault. He WAS all alone, minding his own business (and having bit on the side ...) when his wife "went out for a jog" (wasn't that the excuse?) and never came back.

Did he frantically look for her? No. I think he left it for ages before even calling 000 to report her "missing".

Then with tears in his eyes and his Mother treating him like her "baby" off to the Police they went .......

How many times do you use a razor and cut your face like it was done with fingernails?

The JURY of 12 said he was GUILTY. Now some dumb Defence Lawyer has used WORDS to get this criminal's sentence reduced from MURDER to Manslaughter (it was an accident). Fair bloody go.

He deserves 25+ years in the clink. Or do think males should be able to punch up their women and (perhaps) murder them and get away with it?

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38867
Gender: male

Re: Baden Clay wins appeal.
Reply #59 - Dec 8^th, 2015 at 8:04pm

Neferti wrote on Dec 8^th, 2015 at 8:00pm:

Aussie wrote on Dec 8^th, 2015 at 7:38pm:

Great. Explain why, given he did not intend to kill.

Get with the Plan arsie, Gerard Baden-ClaY hasn't said he did anything, he is INNOCENT, remember?

He has no idea why his wife's DNA was found in his car, or how she ended up in that river bed. It's NOT his fault. He WAS all alone, minding his own business (and having bit on the side ...) when his wife "went out for a jog" (wasn't that the excuse?) and never came back.

Did he frantically look for her? No. I think he left it for ages before even calling 000 to report her "missing".

Then with tears in his eyes and his Mother treating him like her "baby" off to the Police they went .......

How many times do you use a razor and cut your face like it was done with fingernails?

The JURY of 12 said he was GUILTY. Now some dumb Defence Lawyer has used WORDS to get this criminal's sentence reduced from MURDER to Manslaughter (it was an accident). Fair bloody go.

He deserves 25+ years in the clink. Or do think males should be able to punch up their women and (perhaps) murder them and get away with it?

Oh, such emotive an entirely irrelevant stuff. Read the Judgement. You said you had, but you post in complete contradiction of it, suggesting you have no idea why the decision came down the way it did.

Quote:

The JURY of 12 said he was GUILTY.

Yeas, and the Court of Appeal found they had been mislead/misdirected in Law by the Trial Judge. Did you miss that bit?

Back to top

« Last Edit: Dec 8^th, 2015 at 8:17pm by Aussie »

IP Logged