Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 53 54 55 56 57 ... 89
Send Topic Print
Baden Clay wins appeal. (Read 100238 times)
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 140118
Gender: male
Re: Baden Clay wins appeal.
Reply #810 - Jan 13th, 2016 at 11:18am
 

It seems that cods and Lisa both had loads of washing that required urgent attention.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Alinta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1470
Melbourne
Gender: female
Re: Baden Clay wins appeal.
Reply #811 - Jan 13th, 2016 at 11:38am
 
Cods has explained her views...........agree with them or otherwise, she's contributed far more than a "wait and see" attitude. 

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 140118
Gender: male
Re: Baden Clay wins appeal.
Reply #812 - Jan 13th, 2016 at 11:50am
 
Alinta wrote on Jan 13th, 2016 at 11:38am:
Cods has explained her views...........



She hasn't explained her lies, though.

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1449536783/809#809
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: Baden Clay wins appeal.
Reply #813 - Jan 13th, 2016 at 12:28pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13th, 2016 at 11:50am:
Alinta wrote on Jan 13th, 2016 at 11:38am:
Cods has explained her views...........



She hasn't explained her lies, though.

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1449536783/809#809




WHAT LIES ARE THEY?

funny I could have swore someone put this link up that clearly says..

I DIDNT DO IT>>

Re: Baden Clay wins appeal.
Reply #740 - Yesterday at 2:38pm Quote  red baron wrote Yesterday at 2:34pm:
Gerard Baden-Clay has made no statement, no comment on how Allison Baden-Clay died.


"Mr Byrne: Did you kill Allison?

"Mr Baden-Clay: No I did not."

http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/queensland/gerard-badenclay-trial-transcript-of-...

What you don't know you just make up, hey Red?


this is followed by this..

Quote:
During Baden-Clay's appeal four months ago, his lawyers argued it was possible he could have unintentionally killed his wife during an argument at their home in Brookfield, in Brisbane's west.


Quote:
Michael Copley QC told his appeal hearing in August that at best the evidence showed Ms Baden-Clay died during a confrontation with her husband and his actions thereafter were the result of a panic.


Quote:
Baden-Clay's lawyers have claimed that he unintentionally killed his wife
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 140118
Gender: male
Re: Baden Clay wins appeal.
Reply #814 - Jan 13th, 2016 at 12:30pm
 
cods wrote on Jan 13th, 2016 at 12:28pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13th, 2016 at 11:50am:
Alinta wrote on Jan 13th, 2016 at 11:38am:
Cods has explained her views...........



She hasn't explained her lies, though.

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1449536783/809#809




WHAT LIES ARE THEY?



"its strange too how the accused swears blacks white he didnt do it had nothing to do with it..

".he didnt kill her...

"yet his own lawyer says he did???....."


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: Baden Clay wins appeal.
Reply #815 - Jan 13th, 2016 at 12:44pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13th, 2016 at 12:30pm:
cods wrote on Jan 13th, 2016 at 12:28pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13th, 2016 at 11:50am:
Alinta wrote on Jan 13th, 2016 at 11:38am:
Cods has explained her views...........



She hasn't explained her lies, though.

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1449536783/809#809




WHAT LIES ARE THEY?



"its strange too how the accused swears blacks white he didnt do it had nothing to do with it..

".he didnt kill her...

"yet his own lawyer says he did???....."





well I cant help how you read things...

what is he found guilty of manslaughter for???.....

I could have swore manslaughter meant death..

but I am sure you know better.


and you own link... doesnt so it for you either... strange.

note the M word was never used in  this post.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 140118
Gender: male
Re: Baden Clay wins appeal.
Reply #816 - Jan 13th, 2016 at 12:46pm
 
cods wrote on Jan 13th, 2016 at 12:44pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13th, 2016 at 12:30pm:
cods wrote on Jan 13th, 2016 at 12:28pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13th, 2016 at 11:50am:
Alinta wrote on Jan 13th, 2016 at 11:38am:
Cods has explained her views...........



She hasn't explained her lies, though.

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1449536783/809#809




WHAT LIES ARE THEY?



"its strange too how the accused swears blacks white he didnt do it had nothing to do with it..

".he didnt kill her...

"yet his own lawyer says he did???....."





well I cant help how you read things...

what is he found guilty of manslaughter for???.....

I could have swore manslaughter meant death..

but I am sure you know better.


and you own link... doesnt so it for you either... strange.

note the M word was never used in  this post.


"During Baden-Clay's appeal four months ago, his lawyers argued it was possible he could have unintentionally killed his wife during an argument at their home in Brookfield, in Brisbane's west.

"His lawyers then suggested a hypothesis that he covered up the death out of "panic"."
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 38877
Gender: male
Re: Baden Clay wins appeal.
Reply #817 - Jan 13th, 2016 at 12:46pm
 
cods, show us where his lawyer said Baden-Clay killed his wife.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
red baron
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 10204
Blue Mountains
Gender: male
Re: Baden Clay wins appeal.
Reply #818 - Jan 13th, 2016 at 12:49pm
 
My replies are in response to Aussie's post No. 685

The justices also found the Crown argument that dumping the body could infer Baden-Clay was concealing evidence of an intentional killing "amounted to nothing more than speculation".

The appeal court pointed to the couple's history and minimal physical evidence in the case too.

"There were no injuries on the body of a kind to indicate an intent to kill or do grievous bodily harm," the judgment read.

"Nor was there any sign of blood or evidence of a clean-up in the house to suggest violence.

"There was no evidence at all that there had ever been any violence in the relationship between the couple.

COMMENT: There was no evidence to suggest that there ‘wasn’t’ violence between the couple. We do know that the relationship was toxic.


"A reasonably open hypothesis to that (Baden-Clay's) wife had attacked him, scratching his face.

"In endeavouring to make her stop he had killed her without intending to do so, with his conduct thereafter being attributable to panic.

[b]COMMENT[/b]: Why is this a reasonable hypothesis? Why I could reasonably say there  is a reasonable hypothesis to suggest that Gerard and Alison argued vehemently, that he attacked her attempting to strangle her and that he sustained the scratches on his face as Alison desperately fought for her life. Why isn’t this scenario equally as plausible as that of the Appeal Judges?

Acting Attorney-General Cameron Dick is seeking legal advice about appealing today's decision on the fate of Gerard Baden-Clay.

The Attorney-General must make a decision on any possible appeal within 28 days.


HOW THEY REACTED

Peter Shields, the lawyer for Gerard Baden-Clay, asked the public to read the judgment themselves (see below).

"They'll then be able to read for themselves the very considered reasons of a very experienced court," he said.

"They explain in very simple easy-to-understand language how they came to the conclusion that they did.

"I think it's important for the public to understand that it's open justice … they can make their own view based on the facts as the court has."


COMMENT:  This last sentence nails it. The Appeal Court Judges have come up with a scenario, ‘that they think happened'. In other words they have made it up as they  went along. Their hypothesis doesn’t hold water and cannot stand up to scrutiny.






Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
red baron
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 10204
Blue Mountains
Gender: male
Re: Baden Clay wins appeal.
Reply #819 - Jan 13th, 2016 at 12:58pm
 
Gregg your reply No 810 about cods and Lisa having laundry to do.

That reply is trite, condescending and like the huge majority of your posts lends nothing to the argument to hand.

That post doesn't demean cods or Lisa but it does demean you and demonstrates you have no respect for your adversaries.

You are strictly a lightweight out of your depth on this thread Gregg.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 140118
Gender: male
Re: Baden Clay wins appeal.
Reply #820 - Jan 13th, 2016 at 12:59pm
 
red baron wrote on Jan 13th, 2016 at 12:58pm:
Gregg your reply No 810 about cods and Lisa having laundry to do.

That reply is trite, condescending and like the huge majority of your posts lends nothing to the argument to hand.

That post doesn't demean cods or Lisa but it does demean you and demonstrates you have no respect for your adversaries.

You are strictly a lightweight out of your depth on this thread Gregg.



I'll take that as a comment.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 140118
Gender: male
Re: Baden Clay wins appeal.
Reply #821 - Jan 13th, 2016 at 1:00pm
 
cods wrote on Jan 13th, 2016 at 12:44pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13th, 2016 at 12:30pm:
cods wrote on Jan 13th, 2016 at 12:28pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 13th, 2016 at 11:50am:
Alinta wrote on Jan 13th, 2016 at 11:38am:
Cods has explained her views...........



She hasn't explained her lies, though.

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1449536783/809#809




WHAT LIES ARE THEY?



"its strange too how the accused swears blacks white he didnt do it had nothing to do with it..

".he didnt kill her...

"yet his own lawyer says he did???....."





well I cant help how you read things...

what is he found guilty of manslaughter for???.....

I could have swore manslaughter meant death..

but I am sure you know better.


and you own link... doesnt so it for you either... strange.

note the M word was never used in  this post.


"cods, show us where his lawyer said Baden-Clay killed his wife."

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Alinta
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1470
Melbourne
Gender: female
Re: Baden Clay wins appeal.
Reply #822 - Jan 13th, 2016 at 1:07pm
 
"A reasonably open hypothesis to that (Baden-Clay's) wife had attacked him, scratching his face.

"In endeavouring to make her stop he had killed her without intending to do so, with his conduct thereafter being attributable to panic.

COMMENT: Why is this a reasonable hypothesis? Why I could reasonably say there  is a reasonable hypothesis to suggest that Gerard and Alison argued vehemently, that he attacked her attempting to strangle her and that he sustained the scratches on his face as Alison desperately fought for her life. Why isn’t this scenario equally as plausible as that of the Appeal Judges?


That's the issue...........based on the evidence there are equally plausible scenarios.........and why the Appeal Court downgraded the charge to manslaughter....the prosecution didn't prove there could only be one scenario.........the scenario of intentional killing.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 38877
Gender: male
Re: Baden Clay wins appeal.
Reply #823 - Jan 13th, 2016 at 1:19pm
 
Quote:
COMMENT: There was no evidence to suggest that there ‘wasn’t’ violence between the couple. We do know that the relationship was toxic.


If she had been assaulted previously, there may have been signs or even complaints made to police, the counsellor,  friends, work colleagues or family.  No evidence of that kind was produced.

Your use of the cliche 'toxic' gets you into trouble.  He was philandering.  The word 'toxic' suggests that, and much much more.


Quote:
"A reasonably open hypothesis to that (Baden-Clay's) wife had attacked him, scratching his face.

"In endeavouring to make her stop he had killed her without intending to do so, with his conduct thereafter being attributable to panic.

COMMENT: Why is this a reasonable hypothesis? Why I could reasonably say there  is a reasonable hypothesis to suggest that Gerard and Alison argued vehemently, that he attacked her attempting to strangle her and that he sustained the scratches on his face as Alison desperately fought for her life. Why isn’t this scenario equally as plausible as that of the Appeal Judges?


You have answered your own question.  It is plausible, just as the other is plausible.....just as you concede ~ "equally as plausible."


Quote:
HOW THEY REACTED

Peter Shields, the lawyer for Gerard Baden-Clay, asked the public to read the judgment themselves (see below).

"They'll then be able to read for themselves the very considered reasons of a very experienced court," he said.

"They explain in very simple easy-to-understand language how they came to the conclusion that they did.

"I think it's important for the public to understand that it's open justice … they can make their own view based on the facts as the court has."


COMMENT:  This last sentence nails it. The Appeal Court Judges have come up with a scenario, ‘that they think happened'.


Wrong.  They do not think it happened at all.  They say it may have happened, is a plausible explanation, and therefore the Crown has failed to prove the intention to kill.

Quote:
In other words they have made it up as they  went along. Their hypothesis doesn’t hold water and cannot stand up to scrutiny.


I have asked you before.  Why doesn't it hold water.  Put it under scrutiny, not just say it does not stand up.  Explain why it does not stand up.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 38877
Gender: male
Re: Baden Clay wins appeal.
Reply #824 - Jan 13th, 2016 at 1:20pm
 
I see Alinta has posted the same while I was preparing my post.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 53 54 55 56 57 ... 89
Send Topic Print