mothra wrote on Dec 13
th, 2015 at 12:21am:
No you ballsed it all up. It was a valiant attempt though. Well, not really. You just embarrassed yourself.
I never said one thing that was not correct. You just made a bigger fool out of yourself though.
mothra wrote on Dec 13
th, 2015 at 12:21am:
You laughed at the ABC being "leftard"
Most people do.
mothra wrote on Dec 13
th, 2015 at 12:21am:
yet you cite "islam4ifidels"? YEt you weren't even brave enough to cite them. I had to find it.
I made you find it everyone knows how to google except you apparently. I am not particularly interested in poking fun at website hosters like you but more interested in posting content for debate. Something that scares you in this case clearly.
mothra wrote on Dec 13
th, 2015 at 12:21am:
No material support for terrorism. Senate findings. Logic dictates.
3.44 A number of submitters remained unconvinced by the lack of evidence suggesting a direct link between halal certification in Australia and terrorism funding, and continue to speculate:
[T]o me, it is quite clear that the government cannot definitively say that there are no links to funding either extremists or terrorism. Over and over again in those reports they talk about the charities being one of the major conduits for funding terrorism, and all of the halal certifiers—maybe not all, but let's say the majority—boast about how much money they give to charity. I do not think that there is ever going to be a direct link. As with most criminal activity, there are no direct links, and that is why we need investigations to uncover these sorts of things. But it is quite clear that the halal certifiers are giving to charities, and AUSTRAC, AIC and ACC have all said repeatedly that those charities are major conduits for funding extremists and terrorism both here and overseas.[36]
You certainly like making a fool out of yourself mothra.
Its sad to see you must be an angry old woman that's for sure. Clearly Unteachable.