"On the fifth day of the seven-day hearing, Winslow admitted negligence."
http://www.news.com.au/finance/work/at-work/melbourne-sex-harassment-payout-work...A business decision to get rid of the case.... I'd still like to see the evidence... I've cited for a very long time.. since my original submission to the Law Reform Commission over the introduction of 'uniform domestic violence laws', that the intended standard of proof would serve to influence courts to lower the required standard of proof in all matters, but particularly any involving a woman as claimant/victim.
This has in fact occurred... which is partly why in my 1997 assertion "Domestic Violence - Spearpoint of Tyranny", I pointed out that the concept of these 'uniform domestic violence laws' with their standard of proof were, in reality, a direct attack on legal rights.
It would appear that, like my 1983 assertion that permanent unemployment was becoming the reality, there was a need to set in place safeguards and a reasonable standard of income/living for those affected, I was prescient once again.....
Truly am I your best poster........ (shuffles toe in dust shyly)....