Kat
Gold Member
![*](http://www.ozpolitic.com/yabbfiles/Templates/Forum/default/stargold.gif) ![*](http://www.ozpolitic.com/yabbfiles/Templates/Forum/default/stargold.gif) ![*](http://www.ozpolitic.com/yabbfiles/Templates/Forum/default/stargold.gif) ![*](http://www.ozpolitic.com/yabbfiles/Templates/Forum/default/stargold.gif)
Offline
![](http://www.ozpolitic.com/yabbfiles/avatars/UserAvatars/Kat.jpg)
Socialism IS the answer.
Posts: 17709
Everywhere and no-where
Gender:
|
BigOl64 wrote on Dec 18 th, 2015 at 6:12pm: Phemanderac wrote on Dec 18 th, 2015 at 9:36am: There are times when one just hates being right.
I said this would happen when the mining boom busted, I said it back when there was much hand wringing and angst about taxing miners more...
Now we have this reality to deal with.
Mining clearly has not been all that good for Australia, but the few who gain material wealth clearly had more democratic rights than the rest of us who have to deal with their mess left over. Those three nasty brown coal mines were never art of the mining boom genius, they only existed to feed their brown filth into Victoria's power grid, not to export or make money. In coal mining term they are no better than a eat bog, much like the rest of victoria. Maybe being totally ignorant works like a charm with your fellow inbred socialist, but in the real world not so much. This country has earned billions out of our mining; we produce 50% of the world steel making coal, try stopping that and see how things turn out, einstein. Fkkk me you people are beyond stupid. I don't know so much re 'ignorant socialists' or 'beyond stupid', since this one, at least, is essentially in agreement with you.
Did you actually see this - it basically agrees with your estimation, and also explains some of the differences between brown and black coal.
Here it is again - for those who missed it.
Quote:
That brown coal really is filthy stuff - full of impurities, doesn't burn that well, or very cleanly, and has a fairly low calorific value (meaning it's quite inefficient). It is not particularly 'old', geologically speaking.
Black coal (anthracite) on the other hand, has few impurities, burns cleanly and well and has a high calorific value. Anthracite from the Hunter region (Newcastle area) is well-known for being some of the best steaming-coal in the world. It is generally formed much earlier geologically, and been formed under much higher pressures.
Why we continue to burn the brown rubbish (often not that far removed from peat) when we have so much vastly superior black coal, I don't know. It's like having a choice between kerosene and Premium for your car, and choosing the kerosene.
I was, albeit in more detail, attempting to make the same point you are.
|