Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 
Send Topic Print
ISIS raped her then killed her - deserved it? (Read 12918 times)
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: ISIS raped her then killed her - deserved it?
Reply #210 - Jan 9th, 2016 at 9:14am
 
freediver wrote on Jan 9th, 2016 at 8:15am:
It sounds like you are saying something about the morality of it, then a few posts later insisting you are saying nothing about the morality.


Rubbish. No one else had any problem understanding this exceedingly simple point.

Let me put it another way then...

If you support the killing of millions by the US all over the world, then that is far more immoral than supporting the killing of hundreds or thousands by ISIS in a small area. Yet that isn't saying ISIS itself is "morally superior" to the US foreign policies - they clearly aren't

Geddit yet???
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 34441
Gender: male
Re: ISIS raped her then killed her - deserved it?
Reply #211 - Jan 9th, 2016 at 9:46am
 
But .... but ... collateral damage in a war by the US to remove the yolk of a cruel dictatorship off the people of Iraq is something quite different to insurgent Muslims throwing people off tall buildings on the way to establishing a dictatorship far more cruel and genocidal than Saddam's.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49094
At my desk.
Re: ISIS raped her then killed her - deserved it?
Reply #212 - Jan 9th, 2016 at 11:01am
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Jan 9th, 2016 at 9:14am:
freediver wrote on Jan 9th, 2016 at 8:15am:
It sounds like you are saying something about the morality of it, then a few posts later insisting you are saying nothing about the morality.


Rubbish. No one else had any problem understanding this exceedingly simple point.

Let me put it another way then...

If you support the killing of millions by the US all over the world, then that is far more immoral than supporting the killing of hundreds or thousands by ISIS in a small area. Yet that isn't saying ISIS itself is "morally superior" to the US foreign policies - they clearly aren't

Geddit yet???


So US foreign policy is morally superior to ISIS, but supporting ISIS is morally superior to supporting US foreign policy?

Is that why you are so reserved in your criticism of people who support ISIS, as people you are "not sympathetic" to? You would rate them as more moral than people whop support US foreign policy?
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jan 9th, 2016 at 11:09am by freediver »  

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
cods
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 88048
Re: ISIS raped her then killed her - deserved it?
Reply #213 - Jan 9th, 2016 at 11:05am
 
freediver wrote on Jan 9th, 2016 at 11:01am:
So US foreign policy is morally superior to ISIS, but supporting ISIS is morally superior to supporting US foreign policy?



fd sounds just like gweggy....when hes been smoking funny cigarettes..
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: ISIS raped her then killed her - deserved it?
Reply #214 - Jan 9th, 2016 at 11:37am
 
cods wrote on Jan 9th, 2016 at 11:05am:
fd sounds just like gweggy....when hes been smoking funny cigarettes.


gawd tell me about it  Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: ISIS raped her then killed her - deserved it?
Reply #215 - Jan 9th, 2016 at 11:38am
 
freediver wrote on Jan 9th, 2016 at 11:01am:
So US foreign policy is morally superior to ISIS, but supporting ISIS is morally superior to supporting US foreign policy?

Is that why you are so reserved in your criticism of people who support ISIS, as people you are "not sympathetic" to? You would rate them as more moral than people whop support US foreign policy?


Just stick to what I actually said FD - it makes far more sense.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49094
At my desk.
Re: ISIS raped her then killed her - deserved it?
Reply #216 - Jan 9th, 2016 at 11:39am
 
That is what you said Gandalf. Which bit do you think I got wrong?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: ISIS raped her then killed her - deserved it?
Reply #217 - Jan 9th, 2016 at 11:41am
 
See FD it couldn't have been more than 30 seconds since I wrote that, and you've already replied. It literally took you seconds to spew out another response. That is not enough time to write a cogent, considered response.

Take a breath, look at what I actually said, digest it, and above all, stop trying to twist it into something else.
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Online


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49094
At my desk.
Re: ISIS raped her then killed her - deserved it?
Reply #218 - Jan 9th, 2016 at 11:43am
 
I put as much thought into my post as you did yours.

That is what you said Gandalf. Which bit do you think I got wrong?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
longweekend58
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 45675
Gender: male
Re: ISIS raped her then killed her - deserved it?
Reply #219 - Jan 11th, 2016 at 8:51am
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Jan 8th, 2016 at 6:09pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Jan 8th, 2016 at 5:46pm:
would you care to tell us who STARTED the vietnam war?


You're right Longy - the French started it, after the Vietnamese had the hide to want independence from French occupation. After the French were kicked out, the Americans just picked up where the French left off - fighting to deny the will of the Vietnamese people to unite their country.



South Vietnam wanted to be a communist country?  wow... your reading of history is islamified as well.  islam reall does mess with your head doesnt it?  south vietnam was fighting the north BEFORE the US and allies engaged.
Back to top
 

AUSSIE: "Speaking for myself, I could not care less about 298 human beings having their life snuffed out in a nano-second, or what impact that loss has on Members of their family, their parents..."
 
IP Logged
 
teddybear
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 662
melbourne
Gender: male
Re: ISIS raped her then killed her - deserved it?
Reply #220 - Jan 11th, 2016 at 9:12am
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Jan 8th, 2016 at 6:09pm:
longweekend58 wrote on Jan 8th, 2016 at 5:46pm:
would you care to tell us who STARTED the vietnam war?


You're right Longy - the French started it, after the Vietnamese had the hide to want independence from French occupation. After the French were kicked out, the Americans just picked up where the French left off - fighting to deny the will of the Vietnamese people to unite their country.

Background and causes[change | change source]
Viet Minh wave their flag over a captured French bunker at Dien Bien Phu in 1954. The French defeat at Dien Bien Phu in the northern part of Vietnam led the Geneva Conference and the resulting partition of Vietnam into north and south at the 17th Parallel. Hanoi was the capital of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam (North) and Saigon was the capital of the Republic of Vietnam (South).
Viet Minh wave their flag over a captured French bunker at Dien Bien Phu in 1954. The French defeat at Dien Bien Phu in the northern part of Vietnam led the Geneva Conference and the resulting partition of Vietnam into north and south at the 17th Parallel. Hanoi was the capital of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam (North) and Saigon was the capital of the Republic of Vietnam (South).
Map of a partitioned Vietnam from a 1964 U.S. Government pamphlet. Communist-controlled North Vietnam is in red; almost all of the ground-fighting was in the non-communist South.
Map of a partitioned Vietnam from a 1964 U.S. Government pamphlet. Communist-controlled North Vietnam is in red; almost all of the ground-fighting was in the non-communist South.
France began to colonize Vietnam between 1859 and 1862, when they took control of Saigon. By 1864 they controlled all of Cochinchina, the southern part of Vietnam. France took control of Annam, the large central part of Vietnam, in 1874. After France defeated China in the Sino-French war (1884–1885), they took over Tonkin, the northern part of Vietnam. French Indochina was formed in October 1887 from these three areas of Vietnam; Cochinchina, Annam and Tonkin, as well as the Kingdom of Cambodia. Laos was added after a war with Thailand, the Franco-Siamese War, in 1893.

During World War II, after the Nazi Germany's defeated France in 1940, French Indochina was controlled by the Vichy French government, a puppet government approved by Nazi Germany. In March 1945 Imperial Japan launched the Second French Indochina Campaign. Japan occupied Indochina until their surrender in August 1945.

After the defeat of Nazi Germany the Vichy government was no longer in control of France or its territories. The newly formed Provisional Government of the French Republic attempted to take back control of its former colonies in Indochina by force if necessary. But the French efforts at regaining their colony in Vietnam were opposed by a Vietnamese army called the Viet Minh.


Hồ Chí Minh
The Viet Minh had been founded in 1941 by the communist party and was led by Hồ Chí Minh. This led to the First Indochina War between France and the Viet Minh. The fighting started with the French bombardment of Haiphong Harbor in November 1946 and ended with a triumph of the Viet Minh at Dien Bien Phu.

In July 1954, France and the Viet Minh signed the Geneva Peace Accord. This resulted in dividing Vietnam along the 17th parallel into a northern section, under the control of the communist led by Ho Chi Minh as president, and a southern section led by the Catholic anti-communist Ngo Dinh Diem. The partition was to be temporary until elections in 1956. However Diem started arresting suspected communist sympathizers in 1956 to keep power for himself. The elections were never held, and in 1957 the north Vietnamese began guerilla warfare against the south.

The United States supported the anti-communist government in South Vietnam. It began to send military advisers to help train and support the South Vietnamese army. The South was fighting against the Viet Cong, a communist party based in South Vietnam which was allied with North Vietnam. The Viet Cong began a campaign of assassination in 1957. In 1959, North Vietnam dramatically increased its military assistance to the Viet Cong, which then began attacking South Vietnamese military units. The Americans were afraid of the 'domino theory'.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 
Send Topic Print