Australian Politics Forum - Was ASIO right

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register

Forum rules, Recent posts (with text), RSS, Search options, Browse all uploaded images
Home, Articles, Green Tax Shift, Evolution,

Australian Politics Forum › General Discussion › General Board › Was ASIO right

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

Pages: 1

Was ASIO right (Read 209 times)

bogarde73 Gold Member Offline Anti-Global & Contra Mundum Posts: 18443 Gender:	Was ASIO right Jan 14^th, 2016 at 3:39pm Was it right for the head of Asio to ring certain coalition MPs in December and suggest they should tone down their remarks about the Islamic threat? He is entitled to do it if he thinks it could be helpful for security. But isn't it a step down the road towards suppression of free speech, not to mention appeasement?
Back to top	Know the enemies of a civil society by their public behaviour, by their fraudulent claim to be liberal-progressive, by their propensity to lie and, above all, by their attachment to authoritarianism. IP Logged

Kytro

Gold Member

Offline

Blasphemy: a victimless
crime

Posts: 3409
Adelaide
Gender: male

Re: Was ASIO right
Reply #1 - Jan 14^th, 2016 at 3:43pm

bogarde73 wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 3:39pm:

Was it right for the head of Asio to ring certain coalition MPs in December and suggest they should tone down their remarks about the Islamic threat?

He is entitled to do it if he thinks it could be helpful for security. But isn't it a step down the road towards suppression of free speech, not to mention appeasement?

As far as I can tell he was making a suggestion.

That certain types of comments would increase the risk of attacks. I don't think anyone is suggesting that criticisim be banned.

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 75043
Gender: male

Re: Was ASIO right
Reply #2 - Jan 14^th, 2016 at 4:58pm

bogarde73 wrote on Jan 14^th, 2016 at 3:39pm:

His job is the protection of Australia and it's citizens ... it's not to maintain free speech or worry about your rights, that's the politicians jobs.

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

Maqqa

Gold Member

Offline

14% - that low?!

Posts: 16000

Re: Was ASIO right
Reply #3 - Jan 14^th, 2016 at 5:29pm

Democrats (Labor equivalent) in the US is doing similar things.

Obama (Democrat) is refusing to utter the words "Islamic State"

Their theory is - if we use the words Islam or Muslim it incites the terrorists. They think by not saying anything - these terrorists will stopping attacking

NEWSFLASH:
ISIS has recruited about 36,000 foreign fighters already. They aim to convert everyone to Islam or die trying. There is no other choice.

These people are not attacking the West because the West hates muslims. Muslims hate muslims. So the West hating Muslims is not a major driver if it is at all

They are attacking the West because they want to convert everyone to their version of Islam.

Why do they want to convert everyone to their version of Islam? Because they want to get rich like the Saudi muslims. They want their Rolex, Ferrari and jumbo jets.

To get this - they are happy to recruit a million foreigners to die - then so be it!!!

Bill 14% is not the alcohol content of that wine. It's your poll number

IP Logged

Pages: 1

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

« Forum

‹ Board

Top of this page