freediver wrote on Jan 31
st, 2016 at 4:51pm:
Why do you qualify your statement with "without interfering with their sovereign rights"? Does that mean we do have the right to do it if we interfere with their sovereign rights, or is this just an attempt to justify yourself?
I do not have to justify anything except to myself. I qualify it, because
my opinion/position includes the qualification, one you acknowledge but you just find to be
an inconvenience to your position. Quote:If I am going to impose my belief on any State, I cannot effectively do so without breaching its soveregnty.
I can hold my breath, go blue in the face, make railing speeches at the UN, even get a UN resolution (what chance is there of that if say, China is the relevant State) to send in the troops if that State does not bow to my will, (i.e.......I have to impose it) but....to act physically, i.e. militarily to do so is a breach of the State's sovereignty.
That there is a brick wall you are pointlessly butting your head against.