Australian Politics Forum - No love for Pakis on 14/2

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 74677
Gender: male

Re: No love for Pakis on 14/2
Reply #75 - Feb 17^th, 2016 at 12:22pm

Yadda wrote on Feb 17^th, 2016 at 10:12am:

Homosexuals and the LGBT community like to promote the idea that they have cause, for a natural alliance with the the moslem community,

bullsh1t ... thats just your flawed thinking, and not representative of the LGBT communities real motives

most times they promote the cause of equality, even for Muslims, DESPITE the fact that some MUSLIMS don't believe the same should apply to LGBT, simply because they believe in EQUALITY for all. It has nothing to do with any alliance.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 95911
Gender: male

Re: No love for Pakis on 14/2
Reply #76 - Feb 17^th, 2016 at 12:23pm

John Smith wrote on Feb 17^th, 2016 at 12:17pm:

GordyL wrote on Feb 17^th, 2016 at 7:46am:

John Smith wrote on Feb 17^th, 2016 at 7:32am:

freediver wrote on Feb 17^th, 2016 at 7:30am:

John Smith wrote on Feb 16^th, 2016 at 7:30am:

freediver wrote on Feb 16^th, 2016 at 4:34am:

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 15^th, 2016 at 10:43am:

freediver wrote on Feb 14^th, 2016 at 8:02pm:

How far would you extend your silence? Would you still be telling us to mind our own business if they started methodically killing non-Muslims in an increasing number of countries? Or would common sense violate your carefully constructed moral cushion?

Interesting question FD - by the way, how far would you extend your silence over the porkies and the "ban them, kill them, nuke them" attacks against muslims? If it led to killing of muslims in an increasing number of countries, would you continue grasping for endless diversions to avoid having to condemn them, or even address the issue at all? Or would common sense violate your carefully constructed moral cushion?

If I was John Smith, I'd complain about you unfairly bringing it up more often than pedophile priests, or Islamic terrorists, and suggest you mind your own business.

no, if you were john smith you'd stop pretending you had any motive other than your real motive

What motive am I pretending to have John, and what is my real motive?

you're pretending to care about womens rights, your real motive is muslim bashing.

It's certainly true that homophobes, misogynists etc take shelter in Muslim bashing which is obviously a tad hypocritical. This is expected by such people.

But what I find worse are people with progressive views on women, lgbt etc who in fear of the slightest chance of being labelled a racists side with theocrats, Muslim theocrats who hold repugnant views on just about everything they believe in.

Bizarre world eh?

I generally agree, if they restrict themselves to criticising a particular incident or person/s. But if the only time someone makes a comment is to make a derogatory or negative comment about a particular race or religion, then it's pretty obvious that they are racists etc.

Yes, JS, but FD's not racist.

He just asks questions.

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 74677 Gender:	Re: No love for Pakis on 14/2 Reply #77 - Feb 17^th, 2016 at 12:25pm Karnal wrote on Feb 17^th, 2016 at 12:23pm: Yes, JS, but FD's not racist. He just asks questions. I know, he's a humanitarian at heart who's sole concern is women's rights
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 95911
Gender: male

Re: No love for Pakis on 14/2
Reply #78 - Feb 17^th, 2016 at 12:26pm

John Smith wrote on Feb 17^th, 2016 at 12:22pm:

Yadda wrote on Feb 17^th, 2016 at 10:12am:

Homosexuals and the LGBT community like to promote the idea that they have cause, for a natural alliance with the the moslem community,

bullsh1t ... thats just your flawed thinking, and not representative of the LGBT communities real motives

most times they promote the cause of equality, even for Muslims, DESPITE the fact that some MUSLIMS don't believe the same should apply to LGBT, simply because they believe in EQUALITY for all. It has nothing to do with any alliance.

True, JS, but there's an easy response to that.

Quote:

COMMENT by Yadda;

All moslems are filthy stinking liars!!!

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 95911
Gender: male

Re: No love for Pakis on 14/2
Reply #79 - Feb 17^th, 2016 at 12:29pm

John Smith wrote on Feb 17^th, 2016 at 12:25pm:

Karnal wrote on Feb 17^th, 2016 at 12:23pm:

Yes, JS, but FD's not racist.

He just asks questions.

I know, he's a humanitarian at heart who's sole concern is women's rights

That, as FD says, and the Freeeeeedoms of decent white people everywhere. The Muslims, you see, are trying to take away our Freeeeeeedom to oppress the bastards.

FD didn't say the last part, he just agreed with it.

Back to top

IP Logged

GordyL

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 4365
Hate Town
Gender: male

Re: No love for Pakis on 14/2
Reply #80 - Feb 17^th, 2016 at 12:32pm

John Smith wrote on Feb 17^th, 2016 at 12:17pm:

GordyL wrote on Feb 17^th, 2016 at 7:46am:

John Smith wrote on Feb 17^th, 2016 at 7:32am:

freediver wrote on Feb 17^th, 2016 at 7:30am:

John Smith wrote on Feb 16^th, 2016 at 7:30am:

freediver wrote on Feb 16^th, 2016 at 4:34am:

polite_gandalf wrote on Feb 15^th, 2016 at 10:43am:

freediver wrote on Feb 14^th, 2016 at 8:02pm:

How far would you extend your silence? Would you still be telling us to mind our own business if they started methodically killing non-Muslims in an increasing number of countries? Or would common sense violate your carefully constructed moral cushion?

Interesting question FD - by the way, how far would you extend your silence over the porkies and the "ban them, kill them, nuke them" attacks against muslims? If it led to killing of muslims in an increasing number of countries, would you continue grasping for endless diversions to avoid having to condemn them, or even address the issue at all? Or would common sense violate your carefully constructed moral cushion?

If I was John Smith, I'd complain about you unfairly bringing it up more often than pedophile priests, or Islamic terrorists, and suggest you mind your own business.

no, if you were john smith you'd stop pretending you had any motive other than your real motive

What motive am I pretending to have John, and what is my real motive?

you're pretending to care about womens rights, your real motive is muslim bashing.

It's certainly true that homophobes, misogynists etc take shelter in Muslim bashing which is obviously a tad hypocritical. This is expected by such people.

But what I find worse are people with progressive views on women, lgbt etc who in fear of the slightest chance of being labelled a racists side with theocrats, Muslim theocrats who hold repugnant views on just about everything they believe in.

Bizarre world eh?

I generally agree, if they restrict themselves to criticising a particular incident or person/s. But if the only time someone makes a comment is to make a derogatory or negative comment about a particular race or religion, then it's pretty obvious that they are racists etc. My views do not change how your views are seen, even if my views may be flawed.

My problem is with their system because that's what creates the actions of the individuals. I've seen some absolute pearlers of examples where Muslims who pass themselves off as having modern values drop comments like 'we know exactly what to do with fags in Iran'.

Back to top

On the Ning Nang Nong
Where the Cows go Bong!
and the monkeys all say BOO!

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 95911
Gender: male

Re: No love for Pakis on 14/2
Reply #81 - Feb 17^th, 2016 at 12:35pm

GordyL wrote on Feb 17^th, 2016 at 12:32pm: