Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print
Police monitoring former soldiers linked to ... (Read 3121 times)
GordyL
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 4365
Hate Town
Gender: male
Re: Police monitoring former soldiers linked to ...
Reply #60 - Feb 17th, 2016 at 8:14pm
 
Aussie wrote on Feb 17th, 2016 at 8:06pm:
GordyL wrote on Feb 17th, 2016 at 8:04pm:
Aussie wrote on Feb 17th, 2016 at 8:02pm:
BigOl64 wrote on Feb 17th, 2016 at 7:37pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 17th, 2016 at 7:29pm:
Aussie wrote on Feb 17th, 2016 at 7:21pm:
When was Whiney banned, can he tell us?


He's gone all quiet.

He was all too keen to come out with personal abuse and accusations.

However, when asked to back up his claims, he runs away.

Ironically, he calls me a coward (still unsure why).




You know I do have things to do other than replying to little troll bitches in a timely fashion, don't you?



Okay, so when were you last banned Big Girl's Blouse?


Why don't you two do this in pm?


What is 'in pm?'


See the button that says pm?
Back to top
 

On the Ning Nang Nong
Where the Cows go Bong!
and the monkeys all say BOO!
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 38803
Gender: male
Re: Police monitoring former soldiers linked to ...
Reply #61 - Feb 17th, 2016 at 8:25pm
 
Nah.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 138360
Gender: male
Re: Police monitoring former soldiers linked to ...
Reply #62 - Feb 17th, 2016 at 9:30pm
 

So, the whiny little bitch ran away.

What a surprise.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
BatteriesNotIncluded
Gold Member
*****
Offline


MediocrityNET: because
people died for this!

Posts: 26966
Re: Police monitoring former soldiers linked to ...
Reply #63 - Feb 18th, 2016 at 12:29pm
 
aquascoot wrote on Feb 17th, 2016 at 5:19pm:
innocentbystander. wrote on Feb 17th, 2016 at 5:11pm:
... wrote on Feb 17th, 2016 at 4:42pm:
innocentbystander. wrote on Feb 17th, 2016 at 3:46pm:
... wrote on Feb 17th, 2016 at 3:29pm:
Ive noticed that the only things gweg has ever taken a position against are traditionally masculine entities:

The list includes

Sportsmen
Martial artists
Soldiers
Gangs

Get yourself on TRT gweg.  It'll give you a whole new lease on life.






Leftards like greggy are actually competition averse, this is why they support the socialist ideal of everyone is equal and lets not fight about it, lets just give up.

Thats why that whenever a threat manifests itself the leftists first impulse is to surrender and offer appeasement, the left is mortified at the thought of actually fighting,  a leftard would rather live as a sub human slave than die fighting, this is the biological evolutionary path that they have chosen, or rather the one that nature has chosen for them.   


Yes, you've got to look at who benefits from these "equalisation" schemes.  If you're behind the curve, of course you'll support it, because it gives you a leg up.  If you're ahead of the curve, you won't because you'll be dragged back to the pack.
This is why leftard is almost synonymous with "loser".




Exactly, the average leftard fights for a world where we are all equal ... equally f#$%ed like your average leftist that is.



this is true but the world is a paradox.
as more and more people submit to leftard groupthink, they vacate an ENORMOUS field of opportunity for those who can maintain focus and be strong in the face of social pressure.
You just have to flip it and feel your strength growing the more they become emotional and neurotic. Its a nuanced point but i sometimes think the truly powerful people feed the leftard narrative precisely to protect their own position.
In a way, the likes of gweg and LTYC are doing the bidding of the top dog alpha male capitalists (but dont tell them that, they wouldnt understand )

The top dog alpha capitalists that don't rely on subsidies and lobbying do you mean?
Back to top
 

*Sure....they're anti competitive as any subsidised job is.  It wouldn't be there without the tax payer.  Very damned difficult for a brainwashed collectivist to understand that I know....  (swaggy) *
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print