Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11
Send Topic Print
Port Arthur Saga (Read 37615 times)
Captain Caveman
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6211
Gender: male
Re: Port Arthur Saga
Reply #105 - Jun 2nd, 2018 at 8:58am
 
mozzaok wrote on Jun 1st, 2018 at 11:59pm:
I appreciate that light is as mad as a cut snake, but his offensive conspiracy shite is one thing, when it is flat earth crap or lizard people aliens or whatever insanity he suffers from, but this is a step too far.
Little kids were shot down like dogs that day, and nutters should shut the furck up, and leave it alone.

We get it, you are a screw loose certifiable crazy person, go play napoleon or jesus, and let normal folk be.
please.



And therein lies the problem. Brainwashed minions saying to "leave it alone". Then using the "kids got gunned down" as some kind of muzzle to silence the critics. Farrrk offf. 

There should have been a trial. End of story.
When someone pleads "not guilty" then a trial is set.....not holding a disabled man for months on end in solitary with absolutely no charges laid while he is under a gardianship but the gardian is not able to be present while he is intensely interogated....that's illigal. He pleaded not guilty on his own more than several times.
Then releasing his name like they did is illigal too. He pleaded not guilty. Releasing his name then greatly hinders his case doesn't it? It has never happened in the past, and this is a massive case....Yet....the very next day a modified picture and name are released as the "person who did it" (already guilty). No, innocent untill proven guilty is our law system, is it not?
Then a lawyer pleads on his behalf 6 months after he has been pretty much brainwashed into believing this bullshit story.

The timeline of events.......this "story" has more holes than a fly screen.
And discredited whitnesses....some of whome have gone public to try and right this evil wrong.
Why the need to put a 30yr embargo on evidence?
Because there is none that puts bryant at the port arthur site and the case was so poorly handled that it should have gone to trial. Shame Australia, shame. Hold your legal system responsible. Just imagine if it were you they nailed to the cross in this way....and just think for once that you were innocent... how would you feel? Betrayed by the masses?
Cut the bullshit Australia. Live by what you preach. Give Bryant a fair and just trial and bring the true evidence forward......problem now is it has gone to long. Peoples minds have been programmed to believe this nonsense.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
rhino
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17179
Gender: male
Re: Port Arthur Saga
Reply #106 - Jun 2nd, 2018 at 11:12am
 
Captain Caveman wrote on Jun 2nd, 2018 at 8:58am:


There should have been a trial. End of story.
When someone pleads "not guilty" then a trial is set.....not holding a disabled man for months on end in solitary with absolutely no charges laid while he is under a gardianship but the gardian is not able to be present while he is intensely interogated....that's illigal. He pleaded not guilty on his own more than several times.
not illegal.
Quote:
Then releasing his name like they did is illigal too. He pleaded not guilty. Releasing his name then greatly hinders his case doesn't it? It has never happened in the past, and this is a massive case....Yet....the very next day a modified picture and name are released as the "person who did it" (already guilty). No, innocent untill proven guilty is our law system, is it not?
Not illegal and also common practise
Quote:
Then a lawyer pleads on his behalf 6 months after he has been pretty much brainwashed into believing this bullshit story.
Common legal practise for a lawyer to enter a plea on behalf of a client

Quote:
The timeline of events.......this "story" has more holes than a fly screen.
And discredited whitnesses....some of whome have gone public to try and right this evil wrong.
Lie.
Quote:
Why the need to put a 30yr embargo on evidence?
Because there is none that puts bryant at the port arthur site and the case was so poorly handled that it should have gone to trial.
all available evidence including literally hundreds of eye witnesses shows Bryant at the murder site and doing the killings. 
I urge you to seek professional help for your delusions.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
rhino
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17179
Gender: male
Re: Port Arthur Saga
Reply #107 - Jun 2nd, 2018 at 11:22am
 
This site has completely denigrated into a place for conspiracy lunatics and and pathological liars to post their delusions.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
The_Barnacle
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6205
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Port Arthur Saga
Reply #108 - Jun 3rd, 2018 at 11:10am
 
rhino wrote on Jun 2nd, 2018 at 11:22am:
This site has completely denigrated into a place for conspiracy lunatics and and pathological liars to post their delusions.


I have to agree.
Many of the sensible debaters have abandoned this forum.
It's now full of conspiracy theorists who would be regarded as nutcases in the real world. The only place they can express their lunacy is on an anonymous online forum
Back to top
 

The Right Wing only believe in free speech when they agree with what is being said.
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 38821
Gender: male
Re: Port Arthur Saga
Reply #109 - Jun 3rd, 2018 at 11:15am
 
The_Barnacle wrote on Jun 3rd, 2018 at 11:10am:
rhino wrote on Jun 2nd, 2018 at 11:22am:
This site has completely denigrated into a place for conspiracy lunatics and and pathological liars to post their delusions.


I have to agree.
Many of the sensible debaters have abandoned this forum.
It's now full of conspiracy theorists who would be regarded as nutcases in the real world. The only place they can express their lunacy is on an anonymous online forum


At least two.....not by their own choice.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Ajax
Gold Member
*****
Offline


CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 10982
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Port Arthur Saga
Reply #110 - Jun 3rd, 2018 at 11:41am
 
The_Barnacle wrote on Jun 3rd, 2018 at 11:10am:
rhino wrote on Jun 2nd, 2018 at 11:22am:
This site has completely denigrated into a place for conspiracy lunatics and and pathological liars to post their delusions.


I have to agree.
Many of the sensible debaters have abandoned this forum.
It's now full of conspiracy theorists who would be regarded as nutcases in the real world. The only place they can express their lunacy is on an anonymous online forum


You having a go ya mug....?!?!?!

Well its better than being a brainwashed clown who has faith in the Anthropogenic Global Warming Religion with high priest Al Gore as the archbishop.

Not everything is as seems I'm afraid but ignorance is bliss.
Back to top
 

1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery &  prison" Regas Feraeos
 
IP Logged
 
Agnes
Gold Member
*****
Offline


fish dinner

Posts: 6081
Bedford Park rnd
Re: Port Arthur Saga
Reply #111 - Jun 3rd, 2018 at 12:42pm
 
David Icke is the main reason- conspiracy theories are way to much fun for simple minds to ignore-


Back to top
 

x=^..^= x <o((((>< ~~~ x=^..^=x~~~x=^..^=x<o((((><~~~x=^..^=x


farewell to days of wild abandon and freedom in the adriatic
 
IP Logged
 
The_Barnacle
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6205
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Port Arthur Saga
Reply #112 - Jun 3rd, 2018 at 1:01pm
 
Ajax wrote on Jun 3rd, 2018 at 11:41am:
The_Barnacle wrote on Jun 3rd, 2018 at 11:10am:
rhino wrote on Jun 2nd, 2018 at 11:22am:
This site has completely denigrated into a place for conspiracy lunatics and and pathological liars to post their delusions.


I have to agree.
Many of the sensible debaters have abandoned this forum.
It's now full of conspiracy theorists who would be regarded as nutcases in the real world. The only place they can express their lunacy is on an anonymous online forum


You having a go ya mug....?!?!?!

Well its better than being a brainwashed clown who has faith in the Anthropogenic Global Warming Religion with high priest Al Gore as the archbishop.

Not everything is as seems I'm afraid but ignorance is bliss.


I'm not just talking about Global Warming conspiracy theories
I'm also talking about, moon landing hoaxers, 9/11 inside job, chemtrails and of course Port Arthur
Back to top
 

The Right Wing only believe in free speech when they agree with what is being said.
 
IP Logged
 
goldkam
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 292
Re: Port Arthur Saga
Reply #113 - Jun 3rd, 2018 at 1:15pm
 
The_Barnacle wrote on Jun 3rd, 2018 at 11:10am:
rhino wrote on Jun 2nd, 2018 at 11:22am:
This site has completely denigrated into a place for conspiracy lunatics and and pathological liars to post their delusions.


I have to agree.
Many of the sensible debaters have abandoned this forum.
It's now full of conspiracy theorists who would be regarded as nutcases in the real world. The only place they can express their lunacy is on an anonymous online forum


I don't know about nutcases, its rather an intriguing topic and area to research into. Some conspiracy theories have some valid points, in which will never be proven purely because of the involvement of governments, police and general secrecy. No doubt a vast majority however are invalid and completely left field.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Deep State Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 85054
Always was always will be HOME
Gender: male
Re: Port Arthur Saga
Reply #114 - Jun 3rd, 2018 at 2:02pm
 
Argh, aye - ye got that mirror gazing masterpiece right....

If only 1% of conspiracy theories are correct ..... like looking for the rabid Islamist in a crowd of Muslims - which one is it?  Which one at the market place is wearing the bomb vest?  Huh
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jun 3rd, 2018 at 2:10pm by Grappler Deep State Feller »  

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Deep State Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 85054
Always was always will be HOME
Gender: male
Re: Port Arthur Saga
Reply #115 - Jun 3rd, 2018 at 2:11pm
 
The_Barnacle wrote on Jun 3rd, 2018 at 1:01pm:
Ajax wrote on Jun 3rd, 2018 at 11:41am:
The_Barnacle wrote on Jun 3rd, 2018 at 11:10am:
rhino wrote on Jun 2nd, 2018 at 11:22am:
This site has completely denigrated into a place for conspiracy lunatics and and pathological liars to post their delusions.


I have to agree.
Many of the sensible debaters have abandoned this forum.
It's now full of conspiracy theorists who would be regarded as nutcases in the real world. The only place they can express their lunacy is on an anonymous online forum


You having a go ya mug....?!?!?!

Well its better than being a brainwashed clown who has faith in the Anthropogenic Global Warming Religion with high priest Al Gore as the archbishop.

Not everything is as seems I'm afraid but ignorance is bliss.


I'm not just talking about Global Warming conspiracy theories
I'm also talking about, moon landing hoaxers, 9/11 inside job, chemtrails and of course Port Arthur


You left out J F Kennedy - any reason for that?   Shocked
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Grappler Deep State Feller
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 85054
Always was always will be HOME
Gender: male
Re: Port Arthur Saga
Reply #116 - Jun 3rd, 2018 at 2:29pm
 
rhino wrote on Jun 2nd, 2018 at 11:22am:
This site has completely denigrated into a place for conspiracy lunatics and and pathological liars to post their delusions.


And then there are the paranoids who view anything and everyone they disagree with or find in any way odd as being conspiracy lunacy and pathological lying... without one iota of substance to the claim.

Those are the worst kind, and cause endless disruption and dispute by sneering at anything someone else says, as if by some divine right and with superior knowledge of everything in this wide, wide world.

In most places such beings are called trolls... flamers .... or just plain clowns bent on disruption and personal self-aggrandisement by sneering at others, and their posts continually show how very little real life experience they themselves have had.

Then there are the outright dicks who launch personal attacks to every post... a valid contribution would be more appreciated from both types, along with a little genuine maturity that precludes them attacking others without posting one iota of sense, reason or fact to support their attack.

EVERY forum is better off without those.
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Ajax
Gold Member
*****
Offline


CO2 has never controlled
temperature on Earth

Posts: 10982
Australia
Gender: male
Re: Port Arthur Saga
Reply #117 - Jun 3rd, 2018 at 6:27pm
 
The_Barnacle wrote on Jun 3rd, 2018 at 1:01pm:
Ajax wrote on Jun 3rd, 2018 at 11:41am:
The_Barnacle wrote on Jun 3rd, 2018 at 11:10am:
rhino wrote on Jun 2nd, 2018 at 11:22am:
This site has completely denigrated into a place for conspiracy lunatics and and pathological liars to post their delusions.


I have to agree.
Many of the sensible debaters have abandoned this forum.
It's now full of conspiracy theorists who would be regarded as nutcases in the real world. The only place they can express their lunacy is on an anonymous online forum


You having a go ya mug....?!?!?!

Well its better than being a brainwashed clown who has faith in the Anthropogenic Global Warming Religion with high priest Al Gore as the archbishop.

Not everything is as seems I'm afraid but ignorance is bliss.


I'm not just talking about Global Warming conspiracy theories
I'm also talking about, moon landing hoaxers, 9/11 inside job, chemtrails and of course Port Arthur


Ones that I subscribe to

1. AGW...Biggest hoax perpetrated to mankind

2. Moon landing.........Never happened

3. 9/11........If the buildings were demolished the official story is BULLSH!T.
Back to top
 

1. There has never been a more serious assault on our standard of living than Anthropogenic Global Warming..Ajax
2. "One hour of freedom is worth more than 40 years of slavery &  prison" Regas Feraeos
 
IP Logged
 
Captain Caveman
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6211
Gender: male
Re: Port Arthur Saga
Reply #118 - Jun 3rd, 2018 at 8:29pm
 
rhino wrote on Jun 2nd, 2018 at 11:12am:
Captain Caveman wrote on Jun 2nd, 2018 at 8:58am:


There should have been a trial. End of story.
When someone pleads "not guilty" then a trial is set.....not holding a disabled man for months on end in solitary with absolutely no charges laid while he is under a gardianship but the gardian is not able to be present while he is intensely interogated....that's illigal. He pleaded not guilty on his own more than several times.
not illegal.
Quote:
Then releasing his name like they did is illigal too. He pleaded not guilty. Releasing his name then greatly hinders his case doesn't it? It has never happened in the past, and this is a massive case....Yet....the very next day a modified picture and name are released as the "person who did it" (already guilty). No, innocent untill proven guilty is our law system, is it not?
Not illegal and also common practise
Quote:
Then a lawyer pleads on his behalf 6 months after he has been pretty much brainwashed into believing this bullshit story.
Common legal practise for a lawyer to enter a plea on behalf of a client

Quote:
The timeline of events.......this "story" has more holes than a fly screen.
And discredited whitnesses....some of whome have gone public to try and right this evil wrong.
Lie.
Quote:
Why the need to put a 30yr embargo on evidence?
Because there is none that puts bryant at the port arthur site and the case was so poorly handled that it should have gone to trial.
all available evidence including literally hundreds of eye witnesses shows Bryant at the murder site and doing the killings. 
I urge you to seek professional help for your delusions.




Well then if all the evidence points to none other than Bryant and is hands down all there putting him behind every shot (cause that is what your hysterics is alluding too) why the need for 6 months solitary and not guilty pleas?
That is illigal.

Care to present me a case where the name of the accused is released as the one who did it, the day after, before any hearings? Take your time....you'll  need it. Happens all the time....according to your spin.

Common legal practice is to take your clients plea....the first time....not 6 fkkkn months down the track after brainwashing the person into a plea......
And you call this behaviour normal. You're barbaric. I don't need my head read dude....you're the one with the loose screws.  Grin  Grin  Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
rhino
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 17179
Gender: male
Re: Port Arthur Saga
Reply #119 - Jun 14th, 2018 at 2:53pm
 
Captain Caveman wrote on Jun 3rd, 2018 at 8:29pm:
rhino wrote on Jun 2nd, 2018 at 11:12am:
Captain Caveman wrote on Jun 2nd, 2018 at 8:58am:


There should have been a trial. End of story.
When someone pleads "not guilty" then a trial is set.....not holding a disabled man for months on end in solitary with absolutely no charges laid while he is under a gardianship but the gardian is not able to be present while he is intensely interogated....that's illigal. He pleaded not guilty on his own more than several times.
not illegal.
Quote:
Then releasing his name like they did is illigal too. He pleaded not guilty. Releasing his name then greatly hinders his case doesn't it? It has never happened in the past, and this is a massive case....Yet....the very next day a modified picture and name are released as the "person who did it" (already guilty). No, innocent untill proven guilty is our law system, is it not?
Not illegal and also common practise
Quote:
Then a lawyer pleads on his behalf 6 months after he has been pretty much brainwashed into believing this bullshit story.
Common legal practise for a lawyer to enter a plea on behalf of a client

Quote:
The timeline of events.......this "story" has more holes than a fly screen.
And discredited whitnesses....some of whome have gone public to try and right this evil wrong.
Lie.
Quote:
Why the need to put a 30yr embargo on evidence?
Because there is none that puts bryant at the port arthur site and the case was so poorly handled that it should have gone to trial.
all available evidence including literally hundreds of eye witnesses shows Bryant at the murder site and doing the killings. 
I urge you to seek professional help for your delusions.




Well then if all the evidence points to none other than Bryant and is hands down all there putting him behind every shot (cause that is what your hysterics is alluding too) why the need for 6 months solitary and not guilty pleas?
That is illigal.
Prisoners are often put in  solitary confinement if they are high profile to protect them from other inmates. Its not illegal (note how I correctly spell illegal)

Quote:
Care to present me a case where the name of the accused is released as the one who did it, the day after, before any hearings? Take your time....you'll  need it. Happens all the time....according to your spin.
A case? seriously? Just scan the daily news, suspects are routinely named.

Quote:
Common legal practice is to take your clients plea....the first time....not 6 fkkkn months down the track after brainwashing the person into a plea......
And you call this behaviour normal. You're barbaric. I don't need my head read dude....you're the one with the loose screws.  Grin  Grin  Grin
wrong again, common practise is not to enter a plea immediately. You really have shown yourself to be an utter ignorant fool on this, you have been wrong on every single point but still you argue. Are you retarded?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11
Send Topic Print