freediver
Gold Member
Offline
www.ozpolitic.com
Posts: 49091
At my desk.
|
Gandalf I realise that Islam compels you to put a positive spin on everything your fellow Muslims do and say, but surely there must be some kind of limit. polite_gandalf wrote on Mar 16 th, 2016 at 6:36am: Karnal wrote on Mar 14 th, 2016 at 8:53pm: freediver wrote on Mar 14 th, 2016 at 7:08pm: |dev|null wrote on Mar 14 th, 2016 at 1:24pm: Soren wrote on Mar 14 th, 2016 at 10:27am: [quote Sooooo..... why aren't the rich Muslim countries give permanent settlement to Muslim refugees? Because that would legitamise the position of their oppressors. This way, pressure is kept on, primarily the Zionest creation commonly referred to as Israel. Why should they be allowed to ethnically cleanse the Middle-East? Soren, you really are a wally, you realise that? Abu expressed similar sentiments. Muslims must maintain the suffering and violence in order to legitimise the inevitable war in which Muslims will finally wipe Israel off the map. It's all part of Islam's culture of protecting Jews. Similar, were they? I pressed him on this particular "quote" before. Turns out it was Falah, not Abu, and it was nothing like what he said. It took about 5 seconds of digging to discover that falah actually advocates peaceful coexistence with Israel. polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 22 nd, 2015 at 3:13pm: freediver wrote on Dec 21 st, 2015 at 4:34pm: polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 21 st, 2015 at 9:15am: freediver wrote on Dec 20 th, 2015 at 8:43pm: Abu used to say that Israel's defeat was not merely inevitable, but just around the corner. That's why the Palestinians must never stop the attacks. The destruction of Israel needs to be justified by an ongoing war. If they make peace, they lose their chance. I think it is this mindset that causes the self destructive tendencies of the various Palestinian groups. Would you mind finding a quote? Just curious is all... Sorry, looks like it was mostly Falah - See, Abu is not the only source of this stuff. falah wrote on May 23 rd, 2012 at 12:32pm: If you don't surrender, you haven't lost. Quote:Falah, what is the difference between refusing to surrender when you have lost so miserably, and not wanting the bloodshed to continue? Do you actually think the Palestinians are on the verge of some kind of victory? It is one thing to sign a peace treaty, another thing to surrender. We have seen what happens to those who made the mistake of surrender History shows us that many wars have looked lost before they swung the other way. It looked like the merciless Crusaders were firmly entrenched in the Palestine when Saladin became leader of Egypt in 1167. 20 years later Saladin had managed to unify the muslims in the region and expel the Christian invaders from Jerusalem. The Crusader occuaption of jerusalem last for 99 years. The Balfour Zionist occupation of Jerusalem has lasted 94 years. In recent years Muslim have freed Sinai, Gaza and southern Lebanon from the Zionist occupation. Since 2000 muslims have managed to force Israel to withdraw from Gaza and southern Lebanon. Full victory is just around the corner by the Grace of God Almighty. Similar sounding rhetoric from Abu: http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1315637372 Ah, so I'll notch that down as yet another thing that Abu didn't say. Its worthwhile checking these things. Anyway, its a pretty bad example to use. Falah is clearly referring to war only in the context of reclaiming Palestinian land that Israel currently occupies - ie the West Bank. Your baseless claim that he is calling for the destruction of Israel is clearly refuted in subsequent comments: Quote:I believe Israelis can live as good neighbours as soon as they get off stolen Palestinian land. Quote:The Israelis can end the violence now by giving the Palestinians their land back. It is simple. freediver wrote on Dec 24 th, 2015 at 10:06am: Quote:Falah is clearly referring to war only in the context of reclaiming Palestinian land that Israel currently occupies - ie the West Bank. Where is this made clear? They guy thinks that the Palestinians are about to have a military victory over Israel - beat them at war. He thinks Israel withdrawing from those patches is a sign of the tide turning in an ongoing war. He sees rocket and terrorist attacks as 'not surrendering' and warns against surrendering. polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 24 th, 2015 at 11:01am: freediver wrote on Dec 24 th, 2015 at 10:06am: Where is this made clear? They guy thinks that the Palestinians are about to have a military victory over Israel - beat them at war. He thinks Israel withdrawing from those patches is a sign of the tide turning in an ongoing war. He sees rocket and terrorist attacks as 'not surrendering' and warns against surrendering. Nothing he says indicates he thinks this war entails the destruction of the state of Israel. In fact he infers the opposite by specifying that Israel could be a viable neighbour of Palestine.
|