Australian Politics Forum - Home detantion for FGM

GordyL

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 4365
Hate Town
Gender: male

Re: Home detantion for FGM
Reply #15 - Mar 18^th, 2016 at 3:09pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 18^th, 2016 at 2:42pm:

GordyL wrote on Mar 18^th, 2016 at 2:37pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 18^th, 2016 at 2:33pm:

GordyL wrote on Mar 18^th, 2016 at 2:22pm:

If they're being assessed for home detention it means everyone is on board with that as the likely outcome.

No, it doesn't.

Why continue to lie?

They might get home detention, they might not.

Your thread title is a lie, and then you continued to lie in the OP.

Then, you cheapen the subject even further by turning it into an excuse for gambling.

As it stands, they "have been sentenced to a maximum 15 months' imprisonment."

If the situation changes (as it may), by all means post updates.

Starting a thread based on lies only makes you look foolish, and puts you in company with the likes of Herbie, Longy, and Armpit.

That's not the sort of crowd you want to be seen with.

You're more outraged about my thread title than FGM. Interesting.

There you go again: more lies.

You should really quit while you're behind.

My very first words in this thread (which is based on a lie) were:

"Nasty business, that I don't condone in any way."

My very first comment.

So, to summarise:

- thread tile is inaccurate;
- text in the OP is inaccurate;
- you're more concerned with winning a bet, than rectifying the mistakes;
- when called out on it, you tell another lie.

Well, at least I know what I'm dealing with here.

If I could be fkd I'd ad up how many words you've devoted towards lambasting my thread title vs discussing the actual issue. 20 to 1?

Back to top

On the Ning Nang Nong
Where the Cows go Bong!
and the monkeys all say BOO!

IP Logged

GordyL Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 4365 Hate Town Gender:	Re: Home detantion for FGM Reply #16 - Mar 18^th, 2016 at 3:13pm I stand by my thread title. I'm outraged that HD is even being considered for FGM. L K!! Even SBS have jumped on my lying bandwagon!!! http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2016/03/18/nsw-genital-mutilation-trio-may-av...
Back to top	On the Ning Nang Nong Where the Cows go Bong! and the monkeys all say BOO! IP Logged

Svengali Gold Member Offline Please don't thank me Posts: 3474 Gender:	Re: Home detantion for FGM Reply #17 - Mar 18^th, 2016 at 3:17pm GordyL wrote on Mar 18^th, 2016 at 1:46pm: Can anyone give a good reason why we need to import religious fanatics like Genetic infusion? Social diversity? Make Australia less boring? Improve GordyL's spelling? "Detantion" really?
Back to top	We first fought the heathens in the name of religion, then Communism, and now in the name of drugs and terrorism. Our excuses for global domination always change. Serj Tankian IP Logged

GordyL Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 4365 Hate Town Gender:	Re: Home detantion for FGM Reply #18 - Mar 18^th, 2016 at 3:19pm Svengali wrote on Mar 18^th, 2016 at 3:17pm: GordyL wrote on Mar 18^th, 2016 at 1:46pm: Can anyone give a good reason why we need to import religious fanatics like Genetic infusion? Social diversity? Make Australia less boring? Do you think women with an intact clitoris are boring? How bizarre!
Back to top	On the Ning Nang Nong Where the Cows go Bong! and the monkeys all say BOO! IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 137833
Gender: male

Re: Home detantion for FGM
Reply #19 - Mar 18^th, 2016 at 4:03pm

GordyL wrote on Mar 18^th, 2016 at 3:13pm:

I stand by my thread title. I'm outraged that HD is even being considered for FGM.

L Cheesy

K!! Even SBS have jumped on my lying bandwagon!!!

http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2016/03/18/nsw-genital-mutilation-trio-may-av...

Unlike you, they are telling the truth:

"may not spend a day behind bars."

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 137833 Gender:	Re: Home detantion for FGM Reply #20 - Mar 18^th, 2016 at 4:05pm GordyL wrote on Mar 18^th, 2016 at 3:09pm: If I could be fkd I'd ad up how many words you've devoted towards lambasting my thread title vs discussing the actual issue. 20 to 1? It needs to be lambasted. You lied. Moreover, it wasn't just the title: you also lied in the OP.
Back to top	IP Logged

GordyL

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 4365
Hate Town
Gender: male

Re: Home detantion for FGM
Reply #21 - Mar 18^th, 2016 at 4:06pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 18^th, 2016 at 4:03pm:

GordyL wrote on Mar 18^th, 2016 at 3:13pm:

I stand by my thread title. I'm outraged that HD is even being considered for FGM.

L Cheesy

K!! Even SBS have jumped on my lying bandwagon!!!

http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2016/03/18/nsw-genital-mutilation-trio-may-av...

Unlike you, they are telling the truth:

"may not spend a day behind bars."

You've devoted a lot of effort into critiquing my syntax as apposed to the actual issue.

So, what do you feel would be an appropriate sentence?

Back to top

On the Ning Nang Nong
Where the Cows go Bong!
and the monkeys all say BOO!

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 137833
Gender: male

Re: Home detantion for FGM
Reply #22 - Mar 18^th, 2016 at 4:09pm

GordyL wrote on Mar 18^th, 2016 at 4:06pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 18^th, 2016 at 4:03pm:

GordyL wrote on Mar 18^th, 2016 at 3:13pm:

I stand by my thread title. I'm outraged that HD is even being considered for FGM.

L Cheesy

K!! Even SBS have jumped on my lying bandwagon!!!

http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2016/03/18/nsw-genital-mutilation-trio-may-av...

Unlike you, they are telling the truth:

"may not spend a day behind bars."

You've devoted a lot of effort into critiquing my syntax as apposed to the actual issue.

So, what do you feel would be an appropriate sentence?

You should read all of my posts.

This one, for example.

Back to top

IP Logged

GordyL

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 4365
Hate Town
Gender: male

Re: Home detantion for FGM
Reply #23 - Mar 18^th, 2016 at 4:10pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 18^th, 2016 at 4:05pm:

GordyL wrote on Mar 18^th, 2016 at 3:09pm:

If I could be fkd I'd ad up how many words you've devoted towards lambasting my thread title vs discussing the actual issue. 20 to 1?

It needs to be lambasted.

You lied.

Moreover, it wasn't just the title: you also lied in the OP.

Did you bother to read the SBS article ?

NSW Supreme Court Justice Peter Johnson has referred the three to be assessed for home detention.

Do you think this is a strong indication of what the result will be?

Back to top

On the Ning Nang Nong
Where the Cows go Bong!
and the monkeys all say BOO!

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 137833
Gender: male

Re: Home detantion for FGM
Reply #24 - Mar 18^th, 2016 at 4:14pm

GordyL wrote on Mar 18^th, 2016 at 4:10pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 18^th, 2016 at 4:05pm:

GordyL wrote on Mar 18^th, 2016 at 3:09pm:

If I could be fkd I'd ad up how many words you've devoted towards lambasting my thread title vs discussing the actual issue. 20 to 1?

It needs to be lambasted.

You lied.

Moreover, it wasn't just the title: you also lied in the OP.

Did you bother to read the SBS article ?

NSW Supreme Court Justice Peter Johnson has referred the three to be assessed for home detention.

Do you think this is a strong indication of what the result will be?

Absolutely.

The result will be an assessment for home detention.

Thus far, they have not been given home detention - they have been given prison sentences.

Therefore, your thread title and OP are inaccurate. Lies, if you will.

Back to top

IP Logged

GordyL

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 4365
Hate Town
Gender: male

Re: Home detantion for FGM
Reply #25 - Mar 18^th, 2016 at 4:23pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 18^th, 2016 at 4:14pm:

GordyL wrote on Mar 18^th, 2016 at 4:10pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 18^th, 2016 at 4:05pm:

GordyL wrote on Mar 18^th, 2016 at 3:09pm:

If I could be fkd I'd ad up how many words you've devoted towards lambasting my thread title vs discussing the actual issue. 20 to 1?

It needs to be lambasted.

You lied.

Moreover, it wasn't just the title: you also lied in the OP.

Did you bother to read the SBS article ?

NSW Supreme Court Justice Peter Johnson has referred the three to be assessed for home detention.

Do you think this is a strong indication of what the result will be?

Absolutely.

The result will be an assessment for home detention.

Thus far, they have not been given home detention - they have been given prison sentences.

Therefore, your thread title and OP are inaccurate. Lies, if you will.

Or a a foregone conclusion?

Do you think a custodial sentence is more appropriate than HD?

Back to top

On the Ning Nang Nong
Where the Cows go Bong!
and the monkeys all say BOO!

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 137833
Gender: male

Re: Home detantion for FGM
Reply #26 - Mar 18^th, 2016 at 4:29pm

GordyL wrote on Mar 18^th, 2016 at 4:23pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 18^th, 2016 at 4:14pm:

GordyL wrote on Mar 18^th, 2016 at 4:10pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 18^th, 2016 at 4:05pm:

GordyL wrote on Mar 18^th, 2016 at 3:09pm:

If I could be fkd I'd ad up how many words you've devoted towards lambasting my thread title vs discussing the actual issue. 20 to 1?

It needs to be lambasted.

You lied.

Moreover, it wasn't just the title: you also lied in the OP.

Did you bother to read the SBS article ?

NSW Supreme Court Justice Peter Johnson has referred the three to be assessed for home detention.

Do you think this is a strong indication of what the result will be?

Absolutely.

The result will be an assessment for home detention.

Thus far, they have not been given home detention - they have been given prison sentences.

Therefore, your thread title and OP are inaccurate. Lies, if you will.

Or a a foregone conclusion?

Do you think a custodial sentence is more appropriate than HD?

I told you to read all of my posts.

"I don't see that home detention would be effective, in the case of the midwife."

Seeing that she has already been given a custodial sentence, it's quite clear that's what I think is more appropriate.

It worries me that you couldn't figure that out for yourself.

Back to top

IP Logged

GordyL

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 4365
Hate Town
Gender: male

Re: Home detantion for FGM
Reply #27 - Mar 18^th, 2016 at 4:38pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 18^th, 2016 at 4:29pm:

GordyL wrote on Mar 18^th, 2016 at 4:23pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 18^th, 2016 at 4:14pm:

GordyL wrote on Mar 18^th, 2016 at 4:10pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 18^th, 2016 at 4:05pm:

GordyL wrote on Mar 18^th, 2016 at 3:09pm:

If I could be fkd I'd ad up how many words you've devoted towards lambasting my thread title vs discussing the actual issue. 20 to 1?

It needs to be lambasted.

You lied.

Moreover, it wasn't just the title: you also lied in the OP.

Did you bother to read the SBS article ?

NSW Supreme Court Justice Peter Johnson has referred the three to be assessed for home detention.

Do you think this is a strong indication of what the result will be?

Absolutely.

The result will be an assessment for home detention.

Thus far, they have not been given home detention - they have been given prison sentences.

Therefore, your thread title and OP are inaccurate. Lies, if you will.

Or a a foregone conclusion?

Do you think a custodial sentence is more appropriate than HD?

I told you to read all of my posts.

"I don't see that home detention would be effective, in the case of the midwife."

Seeing that she has already been given a custodial sentence, it's quite clear that's what I think is more appropriate.

It worries me that you couldn't figure that out for yourself.

My bad, in my head I was going to ask you WHAT do you feel is an appropriate custodial sentence.

Had it been their lawyer 'suggesting' HD I'd not have posted as such, but it was the judge.

When a JUDGE recommends HD, do you not think this is the most likely outcome?

Back to top

On the Ning Nang Nong
Where the Cows go Bong!
and the monkeys all say BOO!

IP Logged

Gnads

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 29670
Gender: male

Re: Home detantion for FGM
Reply #28 - Mar 18^th, 2016 at 5:40pm

Pecca .. really?

You're truly an over dramatic pedantic

Home detention vs may not spend a day behind bars

same same

discuss the issue of FGM & whether or not it deserves a mandatory jail sentence

IMHO home detention is a waste of time

all parties involved deserve jail time

It's serious and warrants more than a p1ssy slap on the wrist with HD

TOO scared to deal with the issue as it should be because of PC.

If it's illegal prosecute it as it should be & that includes
the judicial sentencing

Truth in sentencing.

Back to top

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais

IP Logged

Aussie Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 38770 Gender:	Re: Home detantion for FGM Reply #29 - Mar 18^th, 2016 at 5:52pm Quote: Truth in sentencing. Of course. But, in far too many cases, the only truth some will accept is their version of it.
Back to top	IP Logged