Australian Politics Forum - But OF COURSE they 'escape' jail, you fools!

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 137833
Gender: male

Re: But OF COURSE they 'escape' jail, you fools!
Reply #105 - Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:37am

Mr Hammer wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:35am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:31am:

GordyL wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:25am:

I thought the low end of sentencing is given when police cooperation is given and remorse is shown.

What made you think that?

Do you have a reference to legislation, or guidelines, that set out this law/policy?

GordyL wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:25am:

Would you say they got the very low end of sentencing?

It's at the low end, yes.

How is that "wrong"?

Defending minorities again I see. It's not only wrong the sentence is atrocious numptoid.

Nobody is defending these criminals.

How is it "wrong"?

Back to top

IP Logged

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: But OF COURSE they 'escape' jail, you fools!
Reply #106 - Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:39am

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:37am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:35am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:31am:

GordyL wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:25am:

I thought the low end of sentencing is given when police cooperation is given and remorse is shown.

What made you think that?

Do you have a reference to legislation, or guidelines, that set out this law/policy?

GordyL wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:25am:

Would you say they got the very low end of sentencing?

It's at the low end, yes.

How is that "wrong"?

Defending minorities again I see. It's not only wrong the sentence is atrocious numptoid.

Nobody is defending these criminals.

How is it "wrong"?

Several months in home detention for permanently damaging 2 young girls genitalia????? Huh

And the kids are still in their custody????

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 137833
Gender: male

Re: But OF COURSE they 'escape' jail, you fools!
Reply #107 - Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:42am

Mr Hammer wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:39am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:37am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:35am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:31am:

GordyL wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:25am:

I thought the low end of sentencing is given when police cooperation is given and remorse is shown.

What made you think that?

Do you have a reference to legislation, or guidelines, that set out this law/policy?

GordyL wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:25am:

Would you say they got the very low end of sentencing?

It's at the low end, yes.

How is that "wrong"?

Defending minorities again I see. It's not only wrong the sentence is atrocious numptoid.

Nobody is defending these criminals.

How is it "wrong"?

Several months in home detention for permanently damaging 2 young girls genitalia????? Huh

And the kids are still in their custody????

They haven't been given home detention.

Pay attention.

And, even if they are eventually given home detention, how is that "wrong"?

Why do you not respect our laws and judicial system?

Back to top

IP Logged

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: But OF COURSE they 'escape' jail, you fools!
Reply #108 - Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:44am

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:42am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:39am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:37am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:35am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:31am:

GordyL wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:25am:

I thought the low end of sentencing is given when police cooperation is given and remorse is shown.

What made you think that?

Do you have a reference to legislation, or guidelines, that set out this law/policy?

GordyL wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:25am:

Would you say they got the very low end of sentencing?

It's at the low end, yes.

How is that "wrong"?

Defending minorities again I see. It's not only wrong the sentence is atrocious numptoid.

Nobody is defending these criminals.

How is it "wrong"?

Several months in home detention for permanently damaging 2 young girls genitalia????? Huh

And the kids are still in their custody????

They haven't been given home detention.

Pay attention.

And, even if they are eventually given home detention, how is that "wrong"?

Why do you not respect our laws and judicial system?

I don't respect the judicial system because it's run by leftist douchebags who give lenient sentences to minority groups.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 137833 Gender:	Re: But OF COURSE they 'escape' jail, you fools! Reply #109 - Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:46am GordyL wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:25am: In this case ... remorse was not shown ... You might want to check on that.
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 137833
Gender: male

Re: But OF COURSE they 'escape' jail, you fools!
Reply #110 - Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:47am

Mr Hammer wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:44am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:42am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:39am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:37am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:35am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:31am:

GordyL wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:25am:

I thought the low end of sentencing is given when police cooperation is given and remorse is shown.

What made you think that?

Do you have a reference to legislation, or guidelines, that set out this law/policy?

GordyL wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:25am:

Would you say they got the very low end of sentencing?

It's at the low end, yes.

How is that "wrong"?

Defending minorities again I see. It's not only wrong the sentence is atrocious numptoid.

Nobody is defending these criminals.

How is it "wrong"?

Several months in home detention for permanently damaging 2 young girls genitalia????? Huh

And the kids are still in their custody????

They haven't been given home detention.

Pay attention.

And, even if they are eventually given home detention, how is that "wrong"?

Why do you not respect our laws and judicial system?

I don't respect the judicial system because it's run by leftist douchebags who give lenient sentences to minority groups.

They haven't been given home detention.

Back to top

IP Logged

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: But OF COURSE they 'escape' jail, you fools!
Reply #111 - Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:49am

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:47am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:44am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:42am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:39am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:37am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:35am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:31am:

GordyL wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:25am:

I thought the low end of sentencing is given when police cooperation is given and remorse is shown.

What made you think that?

Do you have a reference to legislation, or guidelines, that set out this law/policy?

GordyL wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:25am:

Would you say they got the very low end of sentencing?

It's at the low end, yes.

How is that "wrong"?

Defending minorities again I see. It's not only wrong the sentence is atrocious numptoid.

Nobody is defending these criminals.

How is it "wrong"?

Several months in home detention for permanently damaging 2 young girls genitalia????? Huh

And the kids are still in their custody????

They haven't been given home detention.

Pay attention.

And, even if they are eventually given home detention, how is that "wrong"?

Why do you not respect our laws and judicial system?

I don't respect the judicial system because it's run by leftist douchebags who give lenient sentences to minority groups.

They haven't been given home detention.

It's being serious considered and will be implemented. The head muslim who gave the green light is too old and sick for the can an they don't want the mother split from the kids. End of story.

Back to top

IP Logged

GordyL

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 4365
Hate Town
Gender: male

Re: But OF COURSE they 'escape' jail, you fools!
Reply #112 - Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:51am

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:46am:

GordyL wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:25am:

In this case ... remorse was not shown ...

You might want to check on that.

During a sentencing hearing in the New South Wales Supreme Court, crown prosecutor Nanette Williams said the girls were "effectively voiceless" in the face of their mother and Magennis.

She said none of the offenders had shown any remorse and they had only given "qualified, ambiguous and self-serving" apologies.

Back to top

On the Ning Nang Nong
Where the Cows go Bong!
and the monkeys all say BOO!

IP Logged

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: But OF COURSE they 'escape' jail, you fools!
Reply #113 - Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:52am

GordyL wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:51am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:46am:

GordyL wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:25am:

In this case ... remorse was not shown ...

You might want to check on that.

During a sentencing hearing in the New South Wales Supreme Court, crown prosecutor Nanette Williams said the girls were "effectively voiceless" in the face of their mother and Magennis.

She said none of the offenders had shown any remorse and they had only given "qualified, ambiguous and self-serving" apologies.

There you go Pecca. You should fully read articles before you comment on them.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 137833
Gender: male

Re: But OF COURSE they 'escape' jail, you fools!
Reply #114 - Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 9:13am

Mr Hammer wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:49am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:47am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:44am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:42am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:39am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:37am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:35am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:31am:

GordyL wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:25am:

I thought the low end of sentencing is given when police cooperation is given and remorse is shown.

What made you think that?

Do you have a reference to legislation, or guidelines, that set out this law/policy?

GordyL wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:25am:

Would you say they got the very low end of sentencing?

It's at the low end, yes.

How is that "wrong"?

Defending minorities again I see. It's not only wrong the sentence is atrocious numptoid.

Nobody is defending these criminals.

How is it "wrong"?

Several months in home detention for permanently damaging 2 young girls genitalia????? Huh

And the kids are still in their custody????

They haven't been given home detention.

Pay attention.

And, even if they are eventually given home detention, how is that "wrong"?

Why do you not respect our laws and judicial system?

I don't respect the judicial system because it's run by leftist douchebags who give lenient sentences to minority groups.

They haven't been given home detention.

It's being serious considered and will be implemented. The head muslim who gave the green light is too old and sick for the can an they don't want the mother split from the kids. End of story.

How is it "wrong"?

Would it make you happier if the courts just imposed long prison sentences on anyone who looks different to yourself?

Not for committing any crimes - just for being ethnic.

Would that make everything alright?

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 137833
Gender: male

Re: But OF COURSE they 'escape' jail, you fools!
Reply #115 - Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 9:23am

Mr Hammer wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:52am:

GordyL wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:51am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:46am:

GordyL wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:25am:

In this case ... remorse was not shown ...

You might want to check on that.

During a sentencing hearing in the New South Wales Supreme Court, crown prosecutor Nanette Williams said the girls were "effectively voiceless" in the face of their mother and Magennis.

She said none of the offenders had shown any remorse and they had only given "qualified, ambiguous and self-serving" apologies.

There you go Pecca. You should fully read articles before you comment on them.

You know what I like to do, Homo?

I like to read the articles from start to finish, and then try to find other articles on the same subject, just so that I'm getting a balanced view.

I also look for the most recent articles available, so that I'm completely up-to-date.

For example:

"The court today heard A2 had made it clear that she did not intend to have khatna performed on her two younger daughters and the Department of Family and Community Services had concluded they did not need to be removed from her care.

"The judge said A2 had apologised to her girls in a letter.

"Khatna has been a practice in our culture for 14 centuries," she wrote.

"The courts found you were injured and I was responsible.

"I thought I was doing what was required culturally and I accept it was against the law.

"I am very sorry to have put you through this. My love always."

"Justice Johnson said he was "satisfied the apologies are genuine and demonstrative of remorse".

"I accept A2 is a loving mother of her daughters," he said."

White flag accepted.

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 95927
Gender: male

Re: But OF COURSE they 'escape' jail, you fools!
Reply #116 - Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 9:27am

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 9:23am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:52am:

GordyL wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:51am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:46am:

GordyL wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:25am:

In this case ... remorse was not shown ...

You might want to check on that.

During a sentencing hearing in the New South Wales Supreme Court, crown prosecutor Nanette Williams said the girls were "effectively voiceless" in the face of their mother and Magennis.

She said none of the offenders had shown any remorse and they had only given "qualified, ambiguous and self-serving" apologies.

There you go Pecca. You should fully read articles before you comment on them.

You know what I like to do, Homo?

I like to read the articles from start to finish, and then try to find other articles on the same subject, just so that I'm getting a balanced view.

I also look for the most recent articles available, so that I'm completely up-to-date.

For example:

"The court today heard A2 had made it clear that she did not intend to have khatna performed on her two younger daughters and the Department of Family and Community Services had concluded they did not need to be removed from her care.

"The judge said A2 had apologised to her girls in a letter.

"Khatna has been a practice in our culture for 14 centuries," she wrote.

"The courts found you were injured and I was responsible.

"I thought I was doing what was required culturally and I accept it was against the law.

"I am very sorry to have put you through this. My love always."

"Justice Johnson said he was "satisfied the apologies are genuine and demonstrative of remorse".

"I accept A2 is a loving mother of her daughters," he said."

White flag accepted.

Sure, but what would the judge know? Surely Homo is in a much better position to judge this case. He read the headline in the UK Daily Mail. He knows all about judicial sentencing practices.

Why should we listen to some judge?

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 137833
Gender: male

Re: But OF COURSE they 'escape' jail, you fools!
Reply #117 - Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 9:34am

Karnal wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 9:27am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 9:23am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:52am:

GordyL wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:51am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:46am:

GordyL wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:25am:

In this case ... remorse was not shown ...

You might want to check on that.

During a sentencing hearing in the New South Wales Supreme Court, crown prosecutor Nanette Williams said the girls were "effectively voiceless" in the face of their mother and Magennis.

She said none of the offenders had shown any remorse and they had only given "qualified, ambiguous and self-serving" apologies.

There you go Pecca. You should fully read articles before you comment on them.

You know what I like to do, Homo?

I like to read the articles from start to finish, and then try to find other articles on the same subject, just so that I'm getting a balanced view.

I also look for the most recent articles available, so that I'm completely up-to-date.

For example:

"The court today heard A2 had made it clear that she did not intend to have khatna performed on her two younger daughters and the Department of Family and Community Services had concluded they did not need to be removed from her care.

"The judge said A2 had apologised to her girls in a letter.

"Khatna has been a practice in our culture for 14 centuries," she wrote.

"The courts found you were injured and I was responsible.

"I thought I was doing what was required culturally and I accept it was against the law.

"I am very sorry to have put you through this. My love always."

"Justice Johnson said he was "satisfied the apologies are genuine and demonstrative of remorse".

"I accept A2 is a loving mother of her daughters," he said."

White flag accepted.

Sure, but what would the judge know? Surely Homo is in a much better position to judge this case. He read the headline in the UK Daily Mail. He knows all about judicial sentencing practices.

Why should we listen to some judge?

Yes, I suppose you're right.

What sort of world would it be if a judge's word was seen to be more credible than a headline straight from the Daily Mail.

Classy journalism.

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 95927
Gender: male

Re: But OF COURSE they 'escape' jail, you fools!
Reply #118 - Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 10:31am

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 9:34am:

Karnal wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 9:27am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 9:23am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:52am:

GordyL wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:51am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:46am:

GordyL wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:25am:

In this case ... remorse was not shown ...

You might want to check on that.

During a sentencing hearing in the New South Wales Supreme Court, crown prosecutor Nanette Williams said the girls were "effectively voiceless" in the face of their mother and Magennis.

She said none of the offenders had shown any remorse and they had only given "qualified, ambiguous and self-serving" apologies.

There you go Pecca. You should fully read articles before you comment on them.

You know what I like to do, Homo?

I like to read the articles from start to finish, and then try to find other articles on the same subject, just so that I'm getting a balanced view.

I also look for the most recent articles available, so that I'm completely up-to-date.

For example:

"The court today heard A2 had made it clear that she did not intend to have khatna performed on her two younger daughters and the Department of Family and Community Services had concluded they did not need to be removed from her care.

"The judge said A2 had apologised to her girls in a letter.

"Khatna has been a practice in our culture for 14 centuries," she wrote.

"The courts found you were injured and I was responsible.

"I thought I was doing what was required culturally and I accept it was against the law.

"I am very sorry to have put you through this. My love always."

"Justice Johnson said he was "satisfied the apologies are genuine and demonstrative of remorse".

"I accept A2 is a loving mother of her daughters," he said."

White flag accepted.

Sure, but what would the judge know? Surely Homo is in a much better position to judge this case. He read the headline in the UK Daily Mail. He knows all about judicial sentencing practices.

Why should we listen to some judge?

Yes, I suppose you're right.

What sort of world would it be if a judge's word was seen to be more credible than a headline straight from the Daily Mail.

Classy journalism.

That's not fair, Greggery. Herbie says the UK Daily Mail is brave enough to say what the mainstream media won't tell us. This newspaper has integrity. Herbie references it all the time.

Homo, of course, prefers to rely on his own judgment. He comes from Western Sydney. How could he possibly mix things up?

Back to top

IP Logged

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: But OF COURSE they 'escape' jail, you fools!
Reply #119 - Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 10:33am

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 9:23am:

Mr Hammer wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:52am:

GordyL wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:51am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:46am:

GordyL wrote on Mar 22^nd, 2016 at 8:25am:

In this case ... remorse was not shown ...

You might want to check on that.

During a sentencing hearing in the New South Wales Supreme Court, crown prosecutor Nanette Williams said the girls were "effectively voiceless" in the face of their mother and Magennis.

She said none of the offenders had shown any remorse and they had only given "qualified, ambiguous and self-serving" apologies.

There you go Pecca. You should fully read articles before you comment on them.

You know what I like to do, Homo?

I like to read the articles from start to finish, and then try to find other articles on the same subject, just so that I'm getting a balanced view.

I also look for the most recent articles available, so that I'm completely up-to-date.

For example:

"The court today heard A2 had made it clear that she did not intend to have khatna performed on her two younger daughters and the Department of Family and Community Services had concluded they did not need to be removed from her care.

"The judge said A2 had apologised to her girls in a letter.

"Khatna has been a practice in our culture for 14 centuries," she wrote.

"The courts found you were injured and I was responsible.

"I thought I was doing what was required culturally and I accept it was against the law.

"I am very sorry to have put you through this. My love always."

"Justice Johnson said he was "satisfied the apologies are genuine and demonstrative of remorse".

"I accept A2 is a loving mother of her daughters," he said."

White flag accepted.

It's a bit late now. Their sex life got flushed down the toilet. Anybody can apologise after they've committed an offence. It really doesn't mean that much though. It's just a gesture.

Back to top

IP Logged