|
John Smith
|
ian wrote on Mar 26 th, 2016 at 12:55pm: John Smith wrote on Mar 26 th, 2016 at 10:37am: John Smith wrote on Mar 26 th, 2016 at 10:29am: ian wrote on Mar 26 th, 2016 at 10:17am: John Smith wrote on Mar 26 th, 2016 at 10:13am: ian wrote on Mar 26 th, 2016 at 10:04am: John Smith wrote on Mar 26 th, 2016 at 9:55am: [
The Dept. of immigration struggles with it's assessments of visa applicants. They often get them wrong.
Show this. Now run away like you normally do when challenged with your absurd statements. I spent 4 years moderating an immigration forum Ian .... there were thousands of cases each year. My wife was denied a visa because they claimed she's been thrown out of Denmark, when in fact she'd never even been to Denmark. They must have mixed up her file with someone else's (I wouldn't be surprised if it was deliberate) and once they make a decision, it's final. You don't like it cough up another $2000 to appeal or try again. There were many others who had to go through the same thing. If they can't get something simple like what country the person had visited (they had her passport with them the id iots) what hope have they got of getting the more intricate stuff right? Not only that but they didn't even get the requirements for her visa class correct. With her next application she spent 1.5hrs telling them what THEY got wrong, and they were taking careful note of all of it. It was such a shemozzle that we even had an immigration lawyer volunteer his services for the second attempt. Immigration Dept. is overworked and understaffed. It's a recipe for mistakes and they occur often Its easy enough, show these thosuands of cases where the department gets it wrong each year. And guess what John, visa denials are not an example of departmental failure. Like I said, I was moderating that forum for 4 years. There were thousands of cases annually. That forum no longer exists. You're right, a denial is not an example of getting it wrong .... however, if (and I'm estimating) in 70% of the cases on that forum, they applicant received their visa after the appeal or reapplication at $2000, then yes, it is a bloody good indication that they got it wrong the first time. Here you go Ian ... In 2010-11, 25% of the 5494 applications from those arriving by plane were successful after their primary application, and 43.4% of 4840 applicants who had completed both a primary application and a final review process were successful. In 2011-12, the figures for people arriving by plane were 25% of 5792 successful at first instance, and 44% of 5159 successful after both primary application and review. http://theconversation.com/factcheck-are-australias-refugee-acceptance-rates-hig...we're already into the thousands, and this article is only looking at asylum seekers, my comments were about ALL immigration Nothing there that supports yourargument that the department got it wrong Johnny. You must be competing with greggary as to who can fail the most today. then you should take english lessons
|
Forum
Pages: 
Time for a referendum on the intake of mass Muslim (Read 13273 times)
