greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 27^th, 2016 at 7:14pm:


An intruder enters a home where a family is sleeping and the adult in the house is not trained or confident in combat. When they encounter the intruder in the dark pure fear takes over and they over react and kill him. Lights go on and discover he is unarmed.

Is it immoral to place a weapon in the intruders hand?

Frank wrote on Mar 27^th, 2016 at 11:49pm:
When all is equal

SMH needs to have a comments section after stories like this. I have read Sydney Morning Herald online occasionally since the 2000 Olympics and the lack of a comments section after an unfavorable opinion story led me here.

The Sheep need to be reminded from time to time that they are Sheep, persecuting this one individual for trying to defend what is his is an example for all. He should have gotten as many family members as possible out of the house or cowered with them in a bedroom. After the tradesman has finished collecting valuables he will leave and all is well again. And I thought I lived in bizarro world!


http://lawnewz.com/crazy/woman-kills-home-intruder-and-media-actually-outraged-a...

54-year-old Gwendolyn Jenrette shot and killed a 17-year-old teen that broke into her Liberty City home on Thursday and now the teen’s family members are calling for the state’s attorney to file charges against the woman.  What’s more, The Washington Post is using the incident to criticize Florida’s homeowner protection laws.

Jenrette raced home last Thursday after she received an alert from a security system company that there was a possible break-in at her home.  Police were also alerted and dispatched to the home, however, Janrette arrived and found 17-year-old Trevon Johnson climbing out of a window.  According to investigators, there was then a confrontation between Johnson and Jenrette and police officers responding to the scene heard at least one gunshot.  They immediately entered the backyard and found Johnson on the ground bleeding from an apparent gunshot wound.  He was immediately transported to a local hospital where he was pronounced dead later that evening.

Jenrette was taken to the police station and interviewed while other investigators stayed behind at the home to collect evidence.  Authorities described her as “a little distraught” by the events but said she was otherwise cooperating with the investigation.

Enter Michael E. Miller with the Washington Post, who picked up on the story for an article this morning in which he laments about the difficulty some states have in prosecuting homeowners that dare to defend their homes from intruders.

The Post highlights several comments critical of Janrette made by Johnson’s family members to local news reporters in the aftermath of the shooting and described them as “an impassioned claims that the teenager deserved justice, despite the circumstances of his death.”

The newspaper even goes so far as to highlight a comment from Johnson’s cousin that seems to blame Janrette for failing to recognize that maybe Johnson didn’t have another way to get money school clothes.

“You have to look at it from every child’s point of view that was raised in the hood,” Johnson cousin Naukita Harris said. “You have to understand… how he gonna get his money to have clothes to go to school? You have to look at it from his point-of-view.”

However, what really gets at the Post is that Florida law provides “some of the staunchest protections in the country” for those seeking to protect their home intruders.

    “A person is justified in using or threatening to use deadly force if he or she reasonably believes that using or threatening to use such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony,” according to state law. “A person who uses or threatens to use deadly force in accordance with this subsection does not have a duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground if the person using or threatening to use the deadly force is not engaged in a criminal activity and is in a place where he or she has a right to be.”

The Post goes on to note that in Florida “anybody who ‘unlawfully and by force enters or attempts to enter a person’s dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle is presumed to be doing so with the intent to commit an unlawful act involving force or violence.’”

It will ultimately be up to the state’s attorney to decide whether charges are justified in this case.  However, as noted above, Florida homeowners are essentially presumed to be lawfully acting in self-defense if they have to shoot an intruder trying to break into to their home.  As a result, Janrette is unlikely to be charged with a crime in this case.  Furthermore, given the circumstance of this case, a strong argument could be made that she would not be charged even in state’s with lesser homeowner protections than Florida.

Bottom line, critics would be wise to pick another incident to hold up as example of alleged injustice that results from Florida’s homeowners protection laws.

GordyL wrote on Mar 27^th, 2016 at 7:23pm:



immoral, unethical, criminal and utterly stupid.  so yes.

There is no defence for a perfect stranger to be in someones house uninvited, entering by breaking in.

What happens to them is as a result of their own stupid actions.

No sympathy.

Most of the cases of "home invasion" that have been in the media of late have had the perpetrators armed & occupants have been injured/wounded.

red baron wrote on Mar 27^th, 2016 at 6:19pm:


Crime Scene Investigation has come a long way since you were in 'the job', and staging a scene by providing your own evidence such as a "knife" will ensure that your defence has very little to defend you with if they find out the truth, which they almost certainly will. Far better to rely on your Lawyer than to manufacture evidence.