Aussie wrote on Mar 27
th, 2016 at 7:42pm:
Quote:Better to salt the scene, eh?
That is....fabricate evidence, cover up evidence, lie, cheat and deceive all the way through the legal process which has been corrupted and perverted by you....a criminal, in this case, encouraged to do so by a former Copper. Just goes to show where moral compasses are really calibrated around these parts.
Are you serious?
Was it intentional? Did you go beyond what was necessary? Were you in fear of your life? Was your family genuinely at risk?
Prove it!
Nobody's acting under advice.
The case in question at the moment will pan out as it may.
If all these people aren't connected in some way, the outcome will be interesting.
In a real life scenario, if tampering with evidence means the difference between GBH and manslaughter, what is the real additional penalty when you acted under panic and duress?
If you pardon the pun, it might be worth the shot.
Some coppers would understand.
If it wasn't a REAL threat, there's no need for such a reaction in the first place.