Valkie
Gold Member
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04666/04666d3b526a48e324509e26a2bf75951790e5e0" alt="*" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04666/04666d3b526a48e324509e26a2bf75951790e5e0" alt="*" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04666/04666d3b526a48e324509e26a2bf75951790e5e0" alt="*" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04666/04666d3b526a48e324509e26a2bf75951790e5e0" alt="*"
Offline
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0deb/d0deb59d977e9b28776dfffed098364a8906e050" alt=""
Australian Politics
Posts: 16142
Central Coast
Gender:
|
We all know that every time a public service is privatized, the costs go up and the service goes down. And we all know why, because it has to be made securely profitable so that the investors can make loads of cash. But if these services are, while publically owned, still profitable, if to a lesser extent, why privatize them?
This is where we have been played for the fools we are. Lobbyists, (faceless ex politicians) are payed an obscene amount of money to represent private interests thereby forging the way for political parties to sell off interests at the expense of the taxpayer, so that private interest can make more and more money.
But its not just selling off public owned business that has these lobbyists chomping at the bit. Other multinational interests have seen the way of using lobbyists to advance their control and market share by conning the less intelligent and easily led (lest I say bribed) politicians to implement laws that guarantee profitability for private interest groups.
Super for example, once was a good thing to be in. Years ago, before compulsory super, super funds had to appeal to people to join and had to have a product that was sufficiently attractive to be worth while. Moving forward, when compulsory super was introduced, super funds no longer had to work so hard, and over time found ways to increase profitability through fees charges and unwanted add ons that cut deeply into super savings.
Medical insurance is another example. When I was first married, I joined a non-compulsory medical fund. I was given 100% of all medical costs back and the fund was still profitable. Then compolsory medical insurance was mandated, first my medical fund informed me that they were no longer "allowed" to give me 100% back, it gradually went from 100% to 80% to 70%, then specific procedures had specific repayments. Now I pay $4000.00 a year and have recently been advised that virtually nothing is covered for my wife's knee replacement.
There are many other examples, third party insurance, privatization of the commonwealth bank, leading to a free for all (or is that a fee for all) banking system where you can actually owe a bank money for leaving money in the bank and that money being eaten away by fees and charges.
No political party should be allowed to sell off public interests, no political party should be allowed to sell off what we, the taxpayer have paid for.
Finally, what sort of moron would sell off a lottery? Its mana from heaven, virtually no overheads, just pure profit, but some moron of biblical proportions has sold off the lottery??????? Or is there another reason, such as perhaps brown paper bags or other favors involved???
We have been conned and played the fool for too long, its time to ask more questions, that is if we are allowed to?
|