Australian Politics Forum - Winning Over The Undecided Voters

Dnarever Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 58177 Here Gender:	Re: Winning Over The Undecided Voters Reply #15 - Apr 18^th, 2016 at 9:47pm ____ wrote on Apr 18^th, 2016 at 7:58pm: Greens can offer an ethical How ethical was it to push Gillard into breaking her no carbon tax commitment ? How ethical to abandon their green policies in grubby preference deals with the Lieberals ?
Back to top	IP Logged

____ Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 33410 Australia Gender:	Re: Winning Over The Undecided Voters Reply #16 - Apr 18^th, 2016 at 9:50pm The issue being discussed was ethical Labor, like the coalition, break election promises and execute first term leaders. What the two olds try and sell the undecided voters for your vote ... will likely be dumped the other side of the election. Greens are the ethical party.
Back to top	IP Logged

____

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male

Re: Winning Over The Undecided Voters
Reply #17 - Apr 18^th, 2016 at 9:55pm

Dnarever wrote on Apr 18^th, 2016 at 9:47pm:

____ wrote on Apr 18^th, 2016 at 7:58pm:

Greens can offer an ethical

How ethical was it to push Gillard into breaking her no carbon tax commitment ?

How ethical to abandon their green policies in grubby preference deals with the Lieberals ?

Greens didn't push Gillard. Labor were desperate for power.

As for preference deals, Labor preferencing away from the Greens in the Liberal held seats like Higgins ... a seat Greens could take from the Libs ... Labor are planning on doing the same thing in other Melbourne seats.

Labor's grubby deal with the Libs?

Voters reject Labor MP push to preference Liberals: poll

Labor voters in Michael Danby's Melbourne Ports have rejected his push to preference the Liberals ahead of the Greens in the marginal seat, according to a new poll.

http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/voters-reject-labor-mp-push-to-preference-libe...

Back to top

IP Logged

John Smith

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 74262
Gender: male

Re: Winning Over The Undecided Voters
Reply #18 - Apr 18^th, 2016 at 9:59pm

Its time wrote on Apr 18^th, 2016 at 9:27pm:

Cmon greens you sound like one of those perennial imbeciles we encounter daily on here from the right

and what is the difference between them and greenswin? the greens and the rightards are like two peas in a pod ... technically different but in reality they are the same.

Back to top

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.

IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 74262 Gender:	Re: Winning Over The Undecided Voters Reply #19 - Apr 18^th, 2016 at 10:00pm ____ wrote on Apr 18^th, 2016 at 9:55pm: Greens didn't push Gillard. it was one of the conditions the greens imposed upon labor in exchange for the greens support. you're an idiot if you are now going to pretend it wasn't greens policy
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

Dnarever

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 58177
Here
Gender: male

Re: Winning Over The Undecided Voters
Reply #20 - Apr 18^th, 2016 at 10:02pm

____ wrote on Apr 18^th, 2016 at 9:55pm:

Dnarever wrote on Apr 18^th, 2016 at 9:47pm:

____ wrote on Apr 18^th, 2016 at 7:58pm:

Greens can offer an ethical

How ethical was it to push Gillard into breaking her no carbon tax commitment ?

How ethical to abandon their green policies in grubby preference deals with the Lieberals ?

Greens didn't push Gillard. Labor were desperate for power.

As for preference deals, Labor preferencing away from the Greens in the Liberal held seats like Higgins ... a seat Greens could take from the Libs ... Labor are planning on doing the same thing in other Melbourne seats.

Labor's grubby deal with the Libs?

Voters reject Labor MP push to preference Liberals: poll

Labor voters in Michael Danby's Melbourne Ports have rejected his push to preference the Liberals ahead of the Greens in the marginal seat, according to a new poll.

http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/voters-reject-labor-mp-push-to-preference-libe...

Considering that he was elected on Liberal preferences it is rather large slice of hypocrisy to expect Labor preferences.

Back to top

IP Logged

____

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male

Re: Winning Over The Undecided Voters
Reply #21 - Apr 18^th, 2016 at 10:03pm

John Smith wrote on Apr 18^th, 2016 at 9:59pm:

Its time wrote on Apr 18^th, 2016 at 9:27pm:

Cmon greens you sound like one of those perennial imbeciles we encounter daily on here from the right

and what is the difference between them and greenswin? the greens and the rightards are like two peas in a pod ... technically different but in reality they are the same.

Boo Hoo. Rusted on labor posters don't like being challenged ... and shown up.

Back to top

IP Logged

____

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male

Re: Winning Over The Undecided Voters
Reply #22 - Apr 18^th, 2016 at 10:05pm

John Smith wrote on Apr 18^th, 2016 at 10:00pm:

____ wrote on Apr 18^th, 2016 at 9:55pm:

Greens didn't push Gillard.

it was one of the conditions the greens imposed upon labor in exchange for the greens support.

you're an idiot if you are now going to pretend it wasn't greens policy

The Greens were not going to support the coalition.
It was Labor's desperation that made Labor break another of their election promises. Labor backflipped because they are a party devoid of ethical values.

Back to top

IP Logged

Its time

Gold Member

Offline

Boot libs out

Posts: 25639
Gender: female

Re: Winning Over The Undecided Voters
Reply #23 - Apr 18^th, 2016 at 10:07pm

John Smith wrote on Apr 18^th, 2016 at 9:59pm:

Its time wrote on Apr 18^th, 2016 at 9:27pm:

Cmon greens you sound like one of those perennial imbeciles we encounter daily on here from the right

and what is the difference between them and greenswin? the greens and the rightards are like two peas in a pod ... technically different but in reality they are the same.

He is winding you up , as greens enjoys doing with just about every single one of his posts

Back to top

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Winning Over The Undecided Voters
Reply #24 - Apr 18^th, 2016 at 10:08pm

____ wrote on Apr 18^th, 2016 at 10:05pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 18^th, 2016 at 10:00pm:

____ wrote on Apr 18^th, 2016 at 9:55pm:

Greens didn't push Gillard.

it was one of the conditions the greens imposed upon labor in exchange for the greens support.

you're an idiot if you are now going to pretend it wasn't greens policy

The Greens were not going to support the coalition.
It was Labor's desperation that made Labor break another of their election promises. Labor backflipped because they are a party devoid of ethical values.

Ethical values?? Your party supports human shields and children being taught to kill!! Your party supports women being flogged for being raped. Your party supports apostates being killed. Your party has no understanding of liberal values, ethical values, or just pure sensible democratic values.

Ethical values, the greens are bereft of them.

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Winning Over The Undecided Voters
Reply #25 - Apr 18^th, 2016 at 10:10pm

____ wrote on Apr 18^th, 2016 at 10:05pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 18^th, 2016 at 10:00pm:

____ wrote on Apr 18^th, 2016 at 9:55pm:

Greens didn't push Gillard.

it was one of the conditions the greens imposed upon labor in exchange for the greens support.

you're an idiot if you are now going to pretend it wasn't greens policy

The Greens were not going to support the coalition.
It was Labor's desperation that made Labor break another of their election promises. Labor backflipped because they are a party devoid of ethical values.

Really? As has been shown the greens do not have problems aligning themselves with coalition policies. No conviction!

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 74262 Gender:	Re: Winning Over The Undecided Voters Reply #26 - Apr 18^th, 2016 at 10:11pm ____ wrote on Apr 18^th, 2016 at 10:05pm: The Greens were not going to support the coalition. thats not what they were saying at the time ... don't try to change history. You should own it instead of being ashamed of the greens actions
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

John Smith Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 74262 Gender:	Re: Winning Over The Undecided Voters Reply #27 - Apr 18^th, 2016 at 10:12pm ____ wrote on Apr 18^th, 2016 at 10:05pm: a party devoid of ethical values. you mean like a party that claims to be all about the environment voting against an ETS? they're the sorts of ethical values you hold dear?
Back to top	Our esteemed leader: I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus. IP Logged

____

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 33410
Australia
Gender: male

Re: Winning Over The Undecided Voters
Reply #28 - Apr 18^th, 2016 at 10:14pm

sir prince duke alevine wrote on Apr 18^th, 2016 at 10:08pm:

____ wrote on Apr 18^th, 2016 at 10:05pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 18^th, 2016 at 10:00pm:

____ wrote on Apr 18^th, 2016 at 9:55pm:

Greens didn't push Gillard.

it was one of the conditions the greens imposed upon labor in exchange for the greens support.

you're an idiot if you are now going to pretend it wasn't greens policy

The Greens were not going to support the coalition.
It was Labor's desperation that made Labor break another of their election promises. Labor backflipped because they are a party devoid of ethical values.

Ethical values?? Your party supports human shields and children being taught to kill!! Your party supports women being flogged for being raped. Your party supports apostates being killed. Your party has no understanding of liberal values, ethical values, or just pure sensible democratic values.

Ethical values, the greens are bereft of them.

http://greens.org.au/policy

Like to point out your claims within the Greens Policies?

Back to top

IP Logged

sir prince duke alevine

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 23619
Gender: male

Re: Winning Over The Undecided Voters
Reply #29 - Apr 18^th, 2016 at 10:14pm

John Smith wrote on Apr 18^th, 2016 at 10:12pm:

____ wrote on Apr 18^th, 2016 at 10:05pm:

a party devoid of ethical values.

you mean like a party that claims to be all about the environment voting against an ETS? they're the sorts of ethical values you hold dear?

Yep, the Greens ensured climate change policy debate would end up in the gutter and the result would be direct action stupidity.

Back to top

Disclaimer for Mothra per POST so it is forever acknowledged: Saying 'Islam' or 'Muslims' doesn't mean ALL muslims. This does not target individual muslims who's opinion I am not aware of.

IP Logged