Australian Politics Forum - A good terrorist

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139596
Gender: male

Re: A good terrorist
Reply #255 - May 6^th, 2016 at 2:12pm

BigOl64 wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 2:08pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 2:00pm:

GordyL wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 1:59pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 1:55pm:

Valkie wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 1:49pm:

Summary execution is the only answer.

Spoken like a true terrorist.

Alternate solution please?

Not carrying out a summary execution.

Good thing that in this case no summary execution was carried out.

It was a prime example of a summary execution.

That is, "an execution in which a person is accused of a crime and immediately killed without benefit of a full and fair trial."

You know, the sort of thing a terrorist would do.

Back to top

IP Logged

BigOl64

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male

Re: A good terrorist
Reply #256 - May 6^th, 2016 at 2:23pm

greggerypeccary wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 2:12pm:

BigOl64 wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 2:08pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 2:00pm:

GordyL wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 1:59pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 1:55pm:

Valkie wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 1:49pm:

Summary execution is the only answer.

Spoken like a true terrorist.

Alternate solution please?

Not carrying out a summary execution.

Good thing that in this case no summary execution was carried out.

It was a prime example of a summary execution.

That is, "an execution in which a person is accused of a crime and immediately killed without benefit of a full and fair trial."

You know, the sort of thing a terrorist would do.

So you believe that enemy combatants are not to be killed in a war, but arrested and given a trial?

Sh1t, it would have taken 300 years to finish World War 2, if you were right, luckily and as usual you are not.

In a war or war like activities, enemy combatants can be just killed according to the rules of engagement and he was, Numpty

It's gotta sting trying to find a way out of looking this friggin stupid.

Back to top

IP Logged

GordyL

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 4365
Hate Town
Gender: male

Re: A good terrorist
Reply #257 - May 6^th, 2016 at 2:31pm

greggerypeccary wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 2:12pm:

BigOl64 wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 2:08pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 2:00pm:

GordyL wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 1:59pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 1:55pm:

Valkie wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 1:49pm:

Summary execution is the only answer.

Spoken like a true terrorist.

Alternate solution please?

Not carrying out a summary execution.

Good thing that in this case no summary execution was carried out.

It was a prime example of a summary execution.

That is, "an execution in which a person is accused of a crime and immediately killed without benefit of a full and fair trial."

You know, the sort of thing a terrorist would do.

If he was labeled as an enemy combatant and designated as a target and the word assassination was not used, would this thread be going around and around in circles?

Back to top

On the Ning Nang Nong
Where the Cows go Bong!
and the monkeys all say BOO!

IP Logged

Svengali

Gold Member

Offline

Please don't thank me

Posts: 3474
Gender: male

Re: A good terrorist
Reply #258 - May 6^th, 2016 at 2:45pm

GordyL wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 2:31pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 2:12pm:

BigOl64 wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 2:08pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 2:00pm:

GordyL wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 1:59pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 1:55pm:

Valkie wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 1:49pm:

Summary execution is the only answer.

Spoken like a true terrorist.

Alternate solution please?

Not carrying out a summary execution.

Good thing that in this case no summary execution was carried out.

It was a prime example of a summary execution.

That is, "an execution in which a person is accused of a crime and immediately killed without benefit of a full and fair trial."

You know, the sort of thing a terrorist would do.

If he was labeled as an enemy combatant and designated as a target and the word assassination was not used, would this thread be going around and around in circles?

Labeled by who? Nobody is prepared to confess to being the judge and jury that issues death warrants.

This can't be done from hiding and those who perform such acts should be liable for the consequences of wrongful death if they act negligently.

Governments are afraid to formally create the death panels that condemn suspected terrorists.

Also bear in mind that about 97% of those held in Guantanamo were not charged with any offence. They were apprehended arbitrarily and held without access to justice.

Back to top

We first fought the heathens in the name of religion, then Communism, and now in the name of drugs and terrorism. Our excuses for global domination always change.
Serj Tankian

IP Logged

GordyL

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 4365
Hate Town
Gender: male

Re: A good terrorist
Reply #259 - May 6^th, 2016 at 2:55pm

Svengali wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 2:45pm:

GordyL wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 2:31pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 2:12pm:

BigOl64 wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 2:08pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 2:00pm:

GordyL wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 1:59pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 1:55pm:

Valkie wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 1:49pm:

Summary execution is the only answer.

Spoken like a true terrorist.

Alternate solution please?

Not carrying out a summary execution.

Good thing that in this case no summary execution was carried out.

It was a prime example of a summary execution.

That is, "an execution in which a person is accused of a crime and immediately killed without benefit of a full and fair trial."

You know, the sort of thing a terrorist would do.

If he was labeled as an enemy combatant and designated as a target and the word assassination was not used, would this thread be going around and around in circles?

Labeled by who?

Maybe we could get Beryl's opinion. If she says he's 'a good fulla' he avoids the drone strike Grin

Back to top

1459207584845.jpg (67 KB | 17 )

On the Ning Nang Nong
Where the Cows go Bong!
and the monkeys all say BOO!

IP Logged

Svengali

Gold Member

Offline

Please don't thank me

Posts: 3474
Gender: male

Re: A good terrorist
Reply #260 - May 6^th, 2016 at 2:58pm

GordyL wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 2:55pm:

Svengali wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 2:45pm:

GordyL wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 2:31pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 2:12pm:

BigOl64 wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 2:08pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 2:00pm:

GordyL wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 1:59pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 1:55pm:

Valkie wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 1:49pm:

Summary execution is the only answer.

Spoken like a true terrorist.

Alternate solution please?

Not carrying out a summary execution.

Good thing that in this case no summary execution was carried out.

It was a prime example of a summary execution.

That is, "an execution in which a person is accused of a crime and immediately killed without benefit of a full and fair trial."

You know, the sort of thing a terrorist would do.

If he was labeled as an enemy combatant and designated as a target and the word assassination was not used, would this thread be going around and around in circles?

Labeled by who?

Maybe we could get Beryl's opinion. If she says he's 'a good fulla' he avoids the drone strike Grin

Beryl would give GordyL the thumb down for rampant hate racism.

Back to top

We first fought the heathens in the name of religion, then Communism, and now in the name of drugs and terrorism. Our excuses for global domination always change.
Serj Tankian

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139596
Gender: male

Re: A good terrorist
Reply #261 - May 6^th, 2016 at 3:51pm

BigOl64 wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 2:23pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 2:12pm:

BigOl64 wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 2:08pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 2:00pm:

GordyL wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 1:59pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 1:55pm:

Valkie wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 1:49pm:

Summary execution is the only answer.

Spoken like a true terrorist.

Alternate solution please?

Not carrying out a summary execution.

Good thing that in this case no summary execution was carried out.

It was a prime example of a summary execution.

That is, "an execution in which a person is accused of a crime and immediately killed without benefit of a full and fair trial."

You know, the sort of thing a terrorist would do.

So you believe that enemy combatants are not to be killed in a war, but arrested and given a trial?

This was a summary execution.

An assassination.

The sort of thing a terrorist would do.

When we do it, you say it's all good.

When they do it, you say it's terrorism.

Do you understand what a massive hypocrite that makes you?

I don't support summary executions, by anyone.

You could learn a thing or two from me.

Back to top

« Last Edit: May 6^th, 2016 at 4:01pm by greggerypeccary »

IP Logged

BigOl64 Gold Member Offline Posts: 14438 Townsville QLD Gender:	Re: A good terrorist Reply #262 - May 6^th, 2016 at 3:54pm greggerypeccary wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 3:51pm: This was a summary execution. An assassination. The sort of thing a terrorist would do. Smell the fear.
Back to top	11986482_1007882839274994_8146501931097142126_n.jpg (31 KB \| 15 ) IP Logged

Grappler Deep State Feller

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 85381
Always was always will be HOME
Gender: male

Re: A good terrorist
Reply #263 - May 6^th, 2016 at 3:58pm

BigOl64 wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 2:08pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 2:00pm:

GordyL wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 1:59pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 1:55pm:

Valkie wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 1:49pm:

Summary execution is the only answer.

Spoken like a true terrorist.

Alternate solution please?

Not carrying out a summary execution.

Good thing that in this case no summary execution was carried out.

Gotta feel good that in this case a terrorist was just killed the proper way, like a dog. Grin

Couldn't have happened to a nicer bloke......

Back to top

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 139596 Gender:	Re: A good terrorist Reply #264 - May 6^th, 2016 at 4:11pm BigOl64 wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 3:54pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 3:51pm: This was a summary execution. An assassination. The sort of thing a terrorist would do. Smell the fear. Yes, I can most certainly smell it.
Back to top	IP Logged

BigOl64

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 14438
Townsville QLD
Gender: male

Re: A good terrorist
Reply #265 - May 6^th, 2016 at 4:16pm

greggerypeccary wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 4:11pm:

BigOl64 wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 3:54pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 3:51pm:

This was a summary execution.

An assassination.

The sort of thing a terrorist would do.

Smell the fear.

Yes, I can most certainly smell it.

Cowards like yourself are always scared of something, especially when there are no women or children to hide behind.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139596
Gender: male

Re: A good terrorist
Reply #266 - May 6^th, 2016 at 4:20pm

BigOl64 wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 4:16pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 4:11pm:

BigOl64 wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 3:54pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 3:51pm:

This was a summary execution.

An assassination.

The sort of thing a terrorist would do.

Smell the fear.

Yes, I can most certainly smell it.

Cowards like yourself are always scared of something, especially when there are no women or children to hide behind.

Interesting.

What is it that I'm scared of at the moment?

I missed that bit.

Back to top

IP Logged

Svengali

Gold Member

Offline

Please don't thank me

Posts: 3474
Gender: male

Re: A good terrorist
Reply #267 - May 6^th, 2016 at 8:00pm

If one examines the history of detainees on Guantanamo one has to question USA's judgement.

Firstly there is the principle of Guantanamo itself. USA did not want to hold the prisoners in USA because the USA justice system could be used by the prisoners. This is a violation of people's rights because in Guantanamo they have no rights.

Secondly of 779 detainees held in Guantanamo only 8 were found guilty by USA military tribunal of any offence, and 4 of those were overturned. Nine have died in custody. Some in mysterious circumstances which cause suspicion of excessive torture gone wrong.

So out of 779 prisoners only 4 (0.51%) have been found guilty by military tribunal.

So the question of USA's judgement in the detention of foreign people is faulty and if the same reasoning is used to select death targets for drones then it is likely that 99% of those killed are innocent. This is why USA does not want to formalize a death panel with identity of death panel members known to the public. They want to keep on killing people with impunity.

https://www.humanrightsfirst.org/sites/default/files/gtmo-by-the-numbers.pdf

Back to top

We first fought the heathens in the name of religion, then Communism, and now in the name of drugs and terrorism. Our excuses for global domination always change.
Serj Tankian

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 106977
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: A good terrorist
Reply #268 - May 6^th, 2016 at 10:37pm

greggerypeccary wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 8:45am:

Bobby. wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 7:31am:

Lisa Jones wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 6:49am:

BigOl64 wrote on May 6^th, 2016 at 5:16am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 6:44pm:

freediver wrote on May 5^th, 2016 at 6:41pm:

There is no rule of law in a war zone Greg. You are supposed to kill people without trial.

So, you're happy for the enemy in this "war" of yours to do the same thing?

Yes, FD?

That's how wars work, numpty.

14 pages later, yet such a basic fact still doesn't compute Grin

Hi Lisa,
The terrorists in Syria need to be rounded up, executed
& bulldozed into unmarked graves.

sir Bobby the terrorist.

You fight terror with terror

not with a limp wristed hand offering a red rose.

Back to top

IP Logged

Setanta Gold Member Offline \/ Peace man! Posts: 16627 Northern NSW Gender:	Re: A good terrorist Reply #269 - May 6^th, 2016 at 10:43pm If people threaten or attack you, you deal harshly and quickly with them. We should expect the same from the either side.
Back to top	IP Logged

Poll
Question: Do you support summary executions, of anyone?
Yes 22 (62.9%) No 13 (37.1%) Total votes: 35 « Created by: greggerypeccary on: May 5^th, 2016 at 12:44pm »