Australian Politics Forum - when it is not racism

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 49233 At my desk.	Re: when it is not racism Reply #60 - May 15^th, 2016 at 8:45pm Quote: If what I say is 'racist,' I'll wear that tag on this matter. Ah, so Gandalf was right all along eh? Thanks for clearing that up Aussie.
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38810
Gender: male

Re: when it is not racism
Reply #61 - May 15^th, 2016 at 9:01pm

freediver wrote on May 15^th, 2016 at 8:45pm:

Quote:

If what I say is 'racist,' I'll wear that tag on this matter.

Ah, so Gandalf was right all along eh? Thanks for clearing that up Aussie.

Indeed he was. I do not accept that what I post on any subject is racist, because that is not in my DNA. But, I could not give a twopenny flying ferk if the best you can come up with to counter a proposal is pathetically cry ~ 'racist.' If that's what you reckon is an 'argument' I don't care. Carry on.

Back to top

IP Logged

Secret Wars

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 3928
Gender: male

Re: when it is not racism
Reply #62 - May 15^th, 2016 at 9:08pm

Aussie wrote on May 15^th, 2016 at 9:01pm:

freediver wrote on May 15^th, 2016 at 8:45pm:

Quote:

If what I say is 'racist,' I'll wear that tag on this matter.

Ah, so Gandalf was right all along eh? Thanks for clearing that up Aussie.

Indeed he was. I do not accept that what I post on any subject is racist, because that is not in my DNA. But, I could not give a twopenny flying ferk if the best you can come up with to counter a proposal is pathetically cry ~ 'racist.' If that's what you reckon is an 'argument' I don't care. Carry on.

Dont worry about it Aussie. The left have overused and abused the term racist to the point where it has lost any impact.

Just your standard luvvie 'argument' rolled out for any occasion, relevance not required. Cool

Back to top

IP Logged

polite_gandalf

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male

Re: when it is not racism
Reply #63 - May 16^th, 2016 at 7:47am

Secret Wars wrote on May 15^th, 2016 at 9:08pm:

The left have overused and abused the term racist to the point where it has lost any impact.

And thats always been FD's line - he spends most of his time here mocking those who pull the "wacist" card. Which is why I was so astonished he became that very caricature he devotes so much time in mocking. And over such an innocuous term as "arabia for arabs" for goodness sake. Its insane. And then he'll tell you with a straight face that while 'arabia for arabs' is the most heinous of racist statements, the statement that 100% of the muslim population are dirty inbred intellectually disabled psychopaths who squat to urinate - is a-ok.

Back to top

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:

Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.

IP Logged

polite_gandalf

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male

Re: when it is not racism
Reply #64 - May 16^th, 2016 at 7:51am

Aussie wrote on May 15^th, 2016 at 7:28pm:

How fascinating! How come no-one bothered to ask me? Gandalf has it right. FD is creating windmills for his mate Sancho.

Why bother delving into what I say about a simple historical fact, looking for some sinister motive? We plonked Israel into a hive of already intrinsically hostile territory and expected there to be peace in our times! (Even after doing so, Israel decided to muscle into its neighbour's lands.)

Absurd.

I say it is not too late to fix that, goodwill prevailing, and make Arabia less of a flash point to the possible destruction of the entire Planet.

What is wrong with Tasmania, which would welcome the economic boost? FD's response to that is ~ "Oh, how could we possibly safely migrate those Isrealis who were willing to get to Tasmania"

I say ~ a decent logistician and a willing migrant would make it work.

If what I say is 'racist,' I'll wear that tag on this matter. Guess that would say I am a Jew Hater, which is totally absurd. I'm not. I am a strong sympathiser.

My mind works on the basis that it made sense Gandhi's India be partitioned.

Same common sense principle.

(The Lawrence of Arabia video was symbolic of many of my thoughts about square pegs and round holes,)

Aussie, in your proposal, what happens to individual jews who decide not to follow the 'exodus' and join the new Israeli state in Tasmania? Should they be free to stay in arabia?

Back to top

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:

Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96220
Gender: male

Re: when it is not racism
Reply #65 - May 16^th, 2016 at 10:22am

polite_gandalf wrote on May 16^th, 2016 at 7:47am:

Secret Wars wrote on May 15^th, 2016 at 9:08pm:

The left have overused and abused the term racist to the point where it has lost any impact.

And thats always been FD's line - he spends most of his time here mocking those who pull the "wacist" card. Which is why I was so astonished he became that very caricature he devotes so much time in mocking. And over such an innocuous term as "arabia for arabs" for goodness sake. Its insane. And then he'll tell you with a straight face that while 'arabia for arabs' is the most heinous of racist statements, the statement that 100% of the muslim population are dirty inbred intellectually disabled psychopaths who squat to urinate - is a-ok.

Exactly. That’s not racist. Dirty inbred subhumans are not a race.

FD calls them a "sub-race" - a most jolly classification as I’m sure you’ll agree.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38810
Gender: male

Re: when it is not racism
Reply #66 - May 16^th, 2016 at 10:39am

polite_gandalf wrote on May 16^th, 2016 at 7:51am:

Aussie wrote on May 15^th, 2016 at 7:28pm:

How fascinating! How come no-one bothered to ask me? Gandalf has it right. FD is creating windmills for his mate Sancho.

Why bother delving into what I say about a simple historical fact, looking for some sinister motive? We plonked Israel into a hive of already intrinsically hostile territory and expected there to be peace in our times! (Even after doing so, Israel decided to muscle into its neighbour's lands.)

Absurd.

I say it is not too late to fix that, goodwill prevailing, and make Arabia less of a flash point to the possible destruction of the entire Planet.

What is wrong with Tasmania, which would welcome the economic boost? FD's response to that is ~ "Oh, how could we possibly safely migrate those Isrealis who were willing to get to Tasmania"

I say ~ a decent logistician and a willing migrant would make it work.

If what I say is 'racist,' I'll wear that tag on this matter. Guess that would say I am a Jew Hater, which is totally absurd. I'm not. I am a strong sympathiser.

My mind works on the basis that it made sense Gandhi's India be partitioned.

Same common sense principle.

(The Lawrence of Arabia video was symbolic of many of my thoughts about square pegs and round holes,)

Aussie, in your proposal, what happens to individual jews who decide not to follow the 'exodus' and join the new Israeli state in Tasmania? Should they be free to stay in arabia?

Their decision, but the State of Israel will have moved to Tasmania.

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96220
Gender: male

Re: when it is not racism
Reply #67 - May 16^th, 2016 at 1:02pm

Aussie wrote on May 16^th, 2016 at 10:39am:

polite_gandalf wrote on May 16^th, 2016 at 7:51am:

Aussie wrote on May 15^th, 2016 at 7:28pm:

How fascinating! How come no-one bothered to ask me? Gandalf has it right. FD is creating windmills for his mate Sancho.

Why bother delving into what I say about a simple historical fact, looking for some sinister motive? We plonked Israel into a hive of already intrinsically hostile territory and expected there to be peace in our times! (Even after doing so, Israel decided to muscle into its neighbour's lands.)

Absurd.

I say it is not too late to fix that, goodwill prevailing, and make Arabia less of a flash point to the possible destruction of the entire Planet.

What is wrong with Tasmania, which would welcome the economic boost? FD's response to that is ~ "Oh, how could we possibly safely migrate those Isrealis who were willing to get to Tasmania"

I say ~ a decent logistician and a willing migrant would make it work.

If what I say is 'racist,' I'll wear that tag on this matter. Guess that would say I am a Jew Hater, which is totally absurd. I'm not. I am a strong sympathiser.

My mind works on the basis that it made sense Gandhi's India be partitioned.

Same common sense principle.

(The Lawrence of Arabia video was symbolic of many of my thoughts about square pegs and round holes,)

Aussie, in your proposal, what happens to individual jews who decide not to follow the 'exodus' and join the new Israeli state in Tasmania? Should they be free to stay in arabia?

Their decision, but the State of Israel will have moved to Tasmania.

Ah, but is Tasmania not for Tasmanians?

Most wacist, I know. Sorry about that.

Back to top

IP Logged

Storm

Senior Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 350
Gender: male

Re: when it is not racism
Reply #68 - May 16^th, 2016 at 1:44pm

Karnal wrote on May 16^th, 2016 at 10:22am:

polite_gandalf wrote on May 16^th, 2016 at 7:47am:

Secret Wars wrote on May 15^th, 2016 at 9:08pm:

The left have overused and abused the term racist to the point where it has lost any impact.

And thats always been FD's line - he spends most of his time here mocking those who pull the "wacist" card. Which is why I was so astonished he became that very caricature he devotes so much time in mocking. And over such an innocuous term as "arabia for arabs" for goodness sake. Its insane. And then he'll tell you with a straight face that while 'arabia for arabs' is the most heinous of racist statements, the statement that 100% of the muslim population are dirty inbred intellectually disabled psychopaths who squat to urinate - is a-ok.

Exactly. That’s not racist. Dirty inbred subhumans are not a race.

FD calls them a "sub-race" - a most jolly classification as I’m sure you’ll agree.

Nice to see FD being right yet again eats you two up like this. I enjoy reading your hissy fits.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38810
Gender: male

Re: when it is not racism
Reply #69 - May 16^th, 2016 at 1:48pm

Karnal wrote on May 16^th, 2016 at 1:02pm:

Aussie wrote on May 16^th, 2016 at 10:39am:

polite_gandalf wrote on May 16^th, 2016 at 7:51am:

Aussie wrote on May 15^th, 2016 at 7:28pm:

How fascinating! How come no-one bothered to ask me? Gandalf has it right. FD is creating windmills for his mate Sancho.

Why bother delving into what I say about a simple historical fact, looking for some sinister motive? We plonked Israel into a hive of already intrinsically hostile territory and expected there to be peace in our times! (Even after doing so, Israel decided to muscle into its neighbour's lands.)

Absurd.

I say it is not too late to fix that, goodwill prevailing, and make Arabia less of a flash point to the possible destruction of the entire Planet.

What is wrong with Tasmania, which would welcome the economic boost? FD's response to that is ~ "Oh, how could we possibly safely migrate those Isrealis who were willing to get to Tasmania"

I say ~ a decent logistician and a willing migrant would make it work.

If what I say is 'racist,' I'll wear that tag on this matter. Guess that would say I am a Jew Hater, which is totally absurd. I'm not. I am a strong sympathiser.

My mind works on the basis that it made sense Gandhi's India be partitioned.

Same common sense principle.

(The Lawrence of Arabia video was symbolic of many of my thoughts about square pegs and round holes,)

Aussie, in your proposal, what happens to individual jews who decide not to follow the 'exodus' and join the new Israeli state in Tasmania? Should they be free to stay in arabia?

Their decision, but the State of Israel will have moved to Tasmania.

Ah, but is Tasmania not for Tasmanians?

Most wacist, I know. Sorry about that.

Oh, Tasmanians would have to be consulted I agree, but there is no way they'd knock back the wealth, prosperity, military muscle and peace the Israelis would bring to their State.

Heavens, they may even get to take over the mainland States as revenge for the number of times they have been left off the map of Australia!

(Making an exception with:)

Back to top

IP Logged

Lord Herbert

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 34441
Gender: male

Re: when it is not racism
Reply #70 - May 16^th, 2016 at 3:44pm

"When is it not racism?"

Good question.

Answer: When it's reverse racism.

That is, when Whites lose places at universities because Negroes, Muslims, Orientals, and subcontinental Abos from India are given priority over those places for reasons based upon race.

link

British universities will be named-and-shamed if they don't practice racism in their selection processes.

This is Marla's 'Socialism' in action.

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96220
Gender: male

Re: when it is not racism
Reply #71 - May 16^th, 2016 at 4:05pm

Lord Herbert wrote on May 16^th, 2016 at 3:44pm:

"When is it not racism?"

Good question.

Answer: When it's reverse racism.

That is, when Whites lose places at universities because Negroes, Muslims, Orientals, and subcontinental Abos from India are given priority over those places for reasons based upon race..

That’s right, Herbie. Their race makes them get better marks, eh?

Typical.

Back to top

IP Logged

Storm

Senior Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 350
Gender: male

Re: when it is not racism
Reply #72 - May 16^th, 2016 at 4:23pm

Karnal wrote on May 16^th, 2016 at 4:05pm:

Lord Herbert wrote on May 16^th, 2016 at 3:44pm:

"When is it not racism?"

Good question.

Answer: When it's reverse racism.

That is, when Whites lose places at universities because Negroes, Muslims, Orientals, and subcontinental Abos from India are given priority over those places for reasons based upon race..

That’s right, Herbie. Their race makes them get better marks, eh?

Typical.

That's why they are all so bright, especially muslims with an average IQ < 81 . Grin

Back to top

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 49233
At my desk.

Re: when it is not racism
Reply #73 - May 17^th, 2016 at 8:11pm

Aussie wrote on May 15^th, 2016 at 9:01pm:

freediver wrote on May 15^th, 2016 at 8:45pm:

Quote:

If what I say is 'racist,' I'll wear that tag on this matter.

Ah, so Gandalf was right all along eh? Thanks for clearing that up Aussie.

Indeed he was. I do not accept that what I post on any subject is racist, because that is not in my DNA. But, I could not give a twopenny flying ferk if the best you can come up with to counter a proposal is pathetically cry ~ 'racist.' If that's what you reckon is an 'argument' I don't care. Carry on.

Ah, so you'll wear the tag, but not accept what is written on it?

When you said Arabia is for Arabs, would you describe 'Arabs' as a racial group?

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38810
Gender: male

Re: when it is not racism
Reply #74 - May 17^th, 2016 at 8:21pm

freediver wrote on May 17^th, 2016 at 8:11pm:

Aussie wrote on May 15^th, 2016 at 9:01pm:

freediver wrote on May 15^th, 2016 at 8:45pm:

Quote:

If what I say is 'racist,' I'll wear that tag on this matter.

Ah, so Gandalf was right all along eh? Thanks for clearing that up Aussie.

Indeed he was. I do not accept that what I post on any subject is racist, because that is not in my DNA. But, I could not give a twopenny flying ferk if the best you can come up with to counter a proposal is pathetically cry ~ 'racist.' If that's what you reckon is an 'argument' I don't care. Carry on.

Ah, so you'll wear the tag, but not accept what is written on it?

When you said Arabia is for Arabs, would you describe 'Arabs' as a racial group?

Of course I would as that term 'race' is presently used, which now takes into much more than just genes. It's a tag which can be thrown any time. Many would reckon 'Jews' are a race, yet they are not in my eyes. But, I accept that is the popular catch all tag.

What's your point?

How about we discuss "Duckland is for Ducks?"

Back to top

IP Logged