Australian Politics Forum - A plucky young Muslima

polite_gandalf Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 20027 Canberra Gender:	Re: A plucky young Muslima Reply #15 - May 23^rd, 2016 at 5:52pm Karnal wrote on May 23^rd, 2016 at 5:29pm: FD calls them treacherous because they broke some pact with Muhammed. Its scheming K - we call them scheming jews.
Back to top	A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said: Quote: Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms. IP Logged

GordyL

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 4365
Hate Town
Gender: male

Re: A plucky young Muslima
Reply #16 - May 23^rd, 2016 at 6:01pm

Karnal wrote on May 23^rd, 2016 at 5:29pm:

GordyL wrote on May 23^rd, 2016 at 4:27pm:

Karnal wrote on May 23^rd, 2016 at 3:48pm:

GordyL wrote on May 23^rd, 2016 at 11:53am:

Karnal wrote on May 23^rd, 2016 at 10:20am:

I remember now. Treacherous - that's what FD calls them.

Freeeeeedom, innit.

This isn't a post about FD, it's about the regressive left latching onto anything that fits their pro muslim propaganda. Do you think Jew hatred is standard among muslims?

I'm not shure, Gordy, but it seems to be fairly standard for Freeeeeeedom fighters.

What do you think of treacherous Jews?

She's a resident of Belgium, what pray tell is she fighting for? You've been banging on for ages that Islam is just a religion with no particular political connections and I was on the verge of believing you. Are you now telling me otherwise? I'm such a confused little Islamophobe Sad

I don't know, Gordy, but you're keeping mum on the treacherous Jews. They have a political connection with the state of Israel. I believe they even have enough nukes to destroy the world.

Mind you, they won't say. Cunning, no?

FD calls them treacherous because they broke some pact with Muhammed. These days, they're breaking all sorts of pacts with the UN and US, who pay for their nukes.

You should know. You live in Wentworth. What should be done about the Jews?

I've never ever ever heard a Sydney Jew speaking of hatred for Muslims. I've witnessed several times overt hatred of Jews by Muslims in Sydney. Even some who were so stupid they didn't know a Jew was paying their wages

That's just my RL experience which kind of gels with the narrative of several Muslims countries which openly talk about annihilating Israel.

Back to top

On the Ning Nang Nong
Where the Cows go Bong!
and the monkeys all say BOO!

IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 48833 At my desk.	Re: A plucky young Muslima Reply #17 - May 23^rd, 2016 at 6:22pm I've seen Gandalf use the 'mindless collective' and the treacherous Jews arguments to justify a Muslim slaughtering hundreds of Jews.
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

Mistress Nicole Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 1278 Gender:	Re: A plucky young Muslima Reply #18 - May 23^rd, 2016 at 6:42pm freediver wrote on May 23^rd, 2016 at 6:22pm: I've seen Gandalf use the 'mindless collective' and the treacherous Jews arguments to justify a Muslim slaughtering hundreds of Jews. Are you a Muslim, Gandalf? Sorry, I'm new here and trying to get the lay of the land.
Back to top	IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 95210
Gender: male

Re: A plucky young Muslima
Reply #19 - May 23^rd, 2016 at 8:18pm

polite_gandalf wrote on May 23^rd, 2016 at 5:52pm:

Karnal wrote on May 23^rd, 2016 at 5:29pm:

FD calls them treacherous because they broke some pact with Muhammed.

Its scheming K - we call them scheming jews.

Hear it, habibis, the Mohammedan confesses.

Thanks, G. Could you now state your support for the execution of gays who do it Mardi Gras-style? Your wishy washy Western morals? Your status as a flagbearer? Your jihad on the Freeeeeeedoms of decent white people everywhere?

I think we’ve finally got him, FD.

Back to top

IP Logged

polite_gandalf Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 20027 Canberra Gender:	Re: A plucky young Muslima Reply #20 - May 23^rd, 2016 at 8:22pm freediver wrote on May 23^rd, 2016 at 6:22pm: I've seen Gandalf use the 'mindless collective' and the treacherous Jews argument Quite right - you saw me using them without me ever mentioning them. Clever eh?
Back to top	A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said: Quote: Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms. IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 95210
Gender: male

Re: A plucky young Muslima
Reply #21 - May 23^rd, 2016 at 9:27pm

polite_gandalf wrote on May 23^rd, 2016 at 8:22pm:

freediver wrote on May 23^rd, 2016 at 6:22pm:

I've seen Gandalf use the 'mindless collective' and the treacherous Jews argument

Quite right - you saw me using them without me ever mentioning them. Clever eh?

Cunning. This one didn’t even mention them, FD.

And you got him anyway.

Back to top

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48833
At my desk.

Re: A plucky young Muslima
Reply #22 - May 23^rd, 2016 at 9:30pm

Every reference to "tribe" made by Gandalf below just happens to be a tribe of Jews.

polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 5^th, 2013 at 10:27am:

freediver wrote on Dec 5^th, 2013 at 8:26am:

If you think these 800 people acted as some kind of mindless collective

Thats exactly what they were.

polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 8^th, 2013 at 7:38pm:

Also the treachery of the jews had nothing to do with them refusing to help the muslims.
Simple facts FD.

polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 5^th, 2013 at 3:11pm:

As I said, there was no real concept of individuality - your personality was literally defined by which tribe you belonged to. And the decisions that govern the tribe are very much decisions that are represented by all the individuals who make up the tribe. Thus there really is no question of collective guilt - no matter how abhorrent we find the term today.

polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 4^th, 2013 at 3:48pm:

Muhammad had been burnt before by granting another traitorous tribe free passage to leave the city - upon which they immediately started plotting against Medina and instigating hostilities.

polite_gandalf wrote on Jun 28^th, 2015 at 4:08pm:

The leaders conspired - yes.

The rest of them had the opportunity to disown their treachery. They declined. So tough titties- off with their heads.

polite_gandalf wrote on Jun 28^th, 2015 at 4:08pm:

What do you think the Banu Qurayza would have done to the muslims if their planned back-stabbing assault on Medina had succeeded?

polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 6^th, 2013 at 2:05pm:

Like I keep saying, it is reasonable to accuse them of collective guilt, since at any time any individual had the opportunity to disassociate themselves from the decisions made on behalf of the tribe.

Gandalf is one of the good Muslims.

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

Mistress Nicole Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 1278 Gender:	Re: A plucky young Muslima Reply #23 - May 23^rd, 2016 at 9:49pm Gandalf is one of the good Muslims. Hmmm. Point well made, Freediver.
Back to top	IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 95210
Gender: male

Re: A plucky young Muslima
Reply #24 - May 24^th, 2016 at 9:59am

freediver wrote on May 23^rd, 2016 at 9:30pm:

Every reference to "tribe" made by Gandalf below just happens to be a tribe of Jews.

polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 5^th, 2013 at 10:27am:

freediver wrote on Dec 5^th, 2013 at 8:26am:

If you think these 800 people acted as some kind of mindless collective

Thats exactly what they were.

polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 8^th, 2013 at 7:38pm:

Also the treachery of the jews had nothing to do with them refusing to help the muslims.
Simple facts FD.

polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 5^th, 2013 at 3:11pm:

As I said, there was no real concept of individuality - your personality was literally defined by which tribe you belonged to. And the decisions that govern the tribe are very much decisions that are represented by all the individuals who make up the tribe. Thus there really is no question of collective guilt - no matter how abhorrent we find the term today.

polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 4^th, 2013 at 3:48pm:

Muhammad had been burnt before by granting another traitorous tribe free passage to leave the city - upon which they immediately started plotting against Medina and instigating hostilities.

polite_gandalf wrote on Jun 28^th, 2015 at 4:08pm:

The leaders conspired - yes.

The rest of them had the opportunity to disown their treachery. They declined. So tough titties- off with their heads.

polite_gandalf wrote on Jun 28^th, 2015 at 4:08pm:

What do you think the Banu Qurayza would have done to the muslims if their planned back-stabbing assault on Medina had succeeded?

polite_gandalf wrote on Dec 6^th, 2013 at 2:05pm:

Like I keep saying, it is reasonable to accuse them of collective guilt, since at any time any individual had the opportunity to disassociate themselves from the decisions made on behalf of the tribe.

Gandalf is one of the good Muslims.

Looks like FD's got you, G.

Do you have a link to this thread, FD? We'll have a little look-see.

Back to top

IP Logged

polite_gandalf

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male

Re: A plucky young Muslima
Reply #25 - May 24^th, 2016 at 10:42am

The phrase "treacherous jew argument" has obvious racist connotations. FD was obviously well aware of this when he put these words into my mouth.

I went to great lengths to point out their treachery had nothing to do with them being jews. FD deliberately set out to play the race card by using the term "treacherous jew", which he knows perfectly well is a notorious phrase heavily laden with racist overtones. But their treachery is a matter of simple historical fact - they conspired with the people who were attempting to annihilate Medina, in secret, in direct violation of the treaty they signed with Muhammad. But pointing that out is wacist innit.

The best FD can argue is that their treachery was justified, but treachery it was.

Back to top

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:

Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 95210
Gender: male

Re: A plucky young Muslima
Reply #26 - May 24^th, 2016 at 10:52am

polite_gandalf wrote on May 24^th, 2016 at 10:42am:

The phrase "treacherous jew argument" has obvious racist connotations. FD was obviously well aware of this when he put these words into my mouth.

I went to great lengths to point out their treachery had nothing to do with them being jews. FD deliberately set out to play the race card by using the term "treacherous jew", which he knows perfectly well is a notorious phrase heavily laden with racist overtones. But their treachery is a matter of simple historical fact - they conspired with the people who were attempting to annihilate Medina, in secret, in direct violation of the treaty they signed with Muhammad. But pointing that out is wacist innit.

The best FD can argue is that their treachery was justified, but treachery it was.

Sure. We'll ask FD, shall we?

FD, do you support the use of wacism in your campaign against the Muselman?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

Back to top

IP Logged

Mr Hammer Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 25212 Gender:	Re: A plucky young Muslima Reply #27 - May 24^th, 2016 at 11:03am Isn't this thread about a Muslim woman who was a lefty sweetheart who actually turned out to be a bad hater Karnal?
Back to top	IP Logged

polite_gandalf

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male

Re: A plucky young Muslima
Reply #28 - May 24^th, 2016 at 11:09am

Karnal wrote on May 24^th, 2016 at 10:52am:

polite_gandalf wrote on May 24^th, 2016 at 10:42am:

The phrase "treacherous jew argument" has obvious racist connotations. FD was obviously well aware of this when he put these words into my mouth.

I went to great lengths to point out their treachery had nothing to do with them being jews. FD deliberately set out to play the race card by using the term "treacherous jew", which he knows perfectly well is a notorious phrase heavily laden with racist overtones. But their treachery is a matter of simple historical fact - they conspired with the people who were attempting to annihilate Medina, in secret, in direct violation of the treaty they signed with Muhammad. But pointing that out is wacist innit.

The best FD can argue is that their treachery was justified, but treachery it was.

Sure. We'll ask FD, shall we?

FD, do you support the use of wacism in your campaign against the Muselman?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

FD won't even acknowledge the labelling of every single male muslim in the world as a filthy, inbred, retarded psychopath who squats to wee, as racist - but he'll leap on to the racist card over such horrific terms as "arabia for arabs" or if anyone points out the simple historical fact that a tribe, who happened to be jewish, violated a treaty they signed - and dares to call it 'treachery'.

Back to top

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:

Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.

IP Logged

Mr Hammer Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 25212 Gender:	Re: A plucky young Muslima Reply #29 - May 24^th, 2016 at 11:17am What she was quoted as saying-“This wasn’t a protest at all, this was just to share joy and peace,” she told BBC at the time, adding that she wanted “to show that things can be different. And that we can live together, not next to each other but with each other.”
Back to top	IP Logged