Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Google, Clinton & the White House (Read 770 times)
bogarde73
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Anti-Global & Contra Mundum

Posts: 18443
Gender: male
Google, Clinton & the White House
Jun 11th, 2016 at 4:00pm
 
Donald Trump has responded to SourceFed’s allegation that Google manipulated its search recommendations to avoid directing users to negative results about Hillary Clinton.
In a comment to Business Insider, the presumptive Republican nominee said the following:

"If this is true, it is a disgrace that Google would do that. Very, very dishonest.

They should let it float and allow people [to] see how crooked she really is."

Earlier today, Breitbart Tech reported on the claims, initially presented in a video from the tech channel SourceFed.

In the video, which has accumulated more than 260,000 views on YouTube since publication, SourceFed’s Matt Lieberman demonstrated that Google’s search recommendations for Hillary Clinton did not include commonly searched-for combinations such as “Hillary Clinton crime” and “Hillary Clinton indictment.”

By comparison, search recommendations on Bing and Yahoo did show these results.

The video went on to draw attention to the links between Google, its CEO Eric Schmidt, Hillary Clinton, and the Obama administration. Schmidt was a founding investor in “The Groundwork,” an organization that aims to harness the technological capabilities of Silicon Valley to put Clinton in the White House. Google’s head of public policy, meanwhile, Johanna Shelton, has made more than 125 visits to the White House while Obama has been in office.
In short, the links between Google and the Democrats run deep. SourceFed’s video followed claims from WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange that the search engine was “directly engaged” in the Clinton campaign.



Nevertheless, Google has issued a strong denial of claims that it manipulated search recommendations on behalf of Clinton. Earlier today, a spokesperson told Breitbart:

"Google Autocomplete does not favour any candidate or cause.  Claims to the contrary simply misunderstand how Autocomplete works. Our Autocomplete algorithm will not show a predicted query that is offensive or disparaging when displayed in conjunction with a person’s name. More generally, our autocomplete predictions are produced based on a number of factors including the popularity of search terms."

Facebook, another tech giant, found itself embroiled in scandal last month after allegations that it manipulated its “Trending News” feature to downplay stories of interest to conservatives. The company was forced to conduct a highly-publicized meeting with conservative pundits to fend off claims of liberal bias. Twitter, too, is facing complaints of anti-conservative biases. In an election cycle where Silicon Valley has faced unprecedented scrutiny over their well-known progressive values, tech companies are clearly finding it hard to convince the public and the media that their services are still politically neutral.
Back to top
 

Know the enemies of a civil society by their public behaviour, by their fraudulent claim to be liberal-progressive, by their propensity to lie and, above all, by their attachment to authoritarianism.
 
IP Logged
 
bogarde73
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Anti-Global & Contra Mundum

Posts: 18443
Gender: male
Re: Google, Clinton & the White House
Reply #1 - Jun 11th, 2016 at 4:03pm
 
Oooh! Assange will now be a word to run to the safe room for,

The manipulations by Facebook and Twitter in relation to EU matters have been well documented by various sources. It comes as no surprise to me that Google, a known tax avoider, would be similarly involved, this time in the US election.
Back to top
 

Know the enemies of a civil society by their public behaviour, by their fraudulent claim to be liberal-progressive, by their propensity to lie and, above all, by their attachment to authoritarianism.
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Google, Clinton & the White House
Reply #2 - Jun 11th, 2016 at 5:55pm
 
Boges are you getting in early collecting as many excuses as you can find to explain his inevitable defeat in November?
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
bogarde73
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Anti-Global & Contra Mundum

Posts: 18443
Gender: male
Re: Google, Clinton & the White House
Reply #3 - Jun 12th, 2016 at 8:15am
 
Not at all gandalf. I have no illusions about Trump's hard road.
This isn't about Trump per se, his comment just happened to be in the article.
If you had been paying attention - I always pay attention to what you write - you would have seen I have been posting stuff on the Silicon Valley mafioso for some time now. How they have been insidiously taking part in trying to mould public opinion on various issues. How they have been collaborating with govts and parties of the left. How a dangerous power of censorship has been allowed to accrue to the likes of Zuckerberg.
So this is only indirectly related to the election.
Back to top
 

Know the enemies of a civil society by their public behaviour, by their fraudulent claim to be liberal-progressive, by their propensity to lie and, above all, by their attachment to authoritarianism.
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print