Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Poll Poll
Question: swear word filter

keep it    
  11 (35.5%)
get rid of it    
  20 (64.5%)




Total votes: 31
« Created by: freediver on: Jun 18th, 2016 at 10:52am »

Pages: 1 2 3 4
Send Topic Print
swear word filter (Read 4016 times)
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
swear word filter
Jun 18th, 2016 at 10:44am
 
Please note that FD himself suggested I post this here - I was happy to keep it between us. But sure, I'll let my views be known here...

I think the whole idea is utterly absurd and should be scrapped altogether. Especially for a board that was specifically set up in the interests of free speech. Personally I like indulging in a few expletives to emphasise my arguments, and I don't believe it detracts from the quality of my arguments. But does it even dissuade people from swearing? Of course not, everyone just finds ways of spelling it differently to avoid the filter. Besides, when you see the word 'smacking' or whatever euphemisms are used, obviously everyone knows what word it is really - thus one way or another, swearing is not avoided anyway.

So for feerks sake, lets stop this shIIt and get rid of this stupid, moronic faarking filter!
Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
Mistress Nicole
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 1278
Gender: female
Re: swear word filter
Reply #1 - Jun 18th, 2016 at 10:51am
 
polite_gandalf wrote on Jun 18th, 2016 at 10:44am:
Please note that FD himself suggested I post this here - I was happy to keep it between us. But sure, I'll let my views be known here...

I think the whole idea is utterly absurd and should be scrapped altogether. Especially for a board that was specifically set up in the interests of free speech. Personally I like indulging in a few expletives to emphasise my arguments, and I don't believe it detracts from the quality of my arguments. But does it even dissuade people from swearing? Of course not, everyone just finds ways of spelling it differently to avoid the filter. Besides, when you see the word 'smacking' or whatever euphemisms are used, obviously everyone knows what word it is really - thus one way or another, swearing is not avoided anyway.

So for feerks sake, lets stop this shIIt and get rid of this stupid, moronic faarking filter!


Well said.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 48842
At my desk.
Re: swear word filter
Reply #2 - Jun 18th, 2016 at 10:52am
 
Poll added.

I removed some of the words from the swear word filter a few weeks back.  There's only about half a dozen in there now.
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Redmond Neck
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 21528
ACT
Gender: male
Re: swear word filter
Reply #3 - Jun 18th, 2016 at 10:59am
 
Leave the C word there.

No need to use that I reckon!
Back to top
 

BAN ALL THESE ABO SITES RECOGNITIONS.

ALL AUSTRALIA IS FOR ALL AUSTRALIANS!
 
IP Logged
 
perceptions_now
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11694
Perth  WA
Gender: male
Re: swear word filter
Reply #4 - Jun 18th, 2016 at 11:01am
 
In my opinion, everything has limits, including WHAT & HOW we say.

If the current limits in place on this site are relaxed any further, then this site will go down a similar road to FD's other site, that being PA, Which frankly leaves a lot to be desired!

However, this is FD's site, so if he wants this site to go down the same path as PA, then that's his decision.

That said, I will not entertain going any further down that path, whatsoever!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 38553
Gender: male
Re: swear word filter
Reply #5 - Jun 18th, 2016 at 11:24am
 
perceptions_now wrote on Jun 18th, 2016 at 11:01am:
In my opinion, everything has limits, including WHAT & HOW we say.

If the current limits in place on this site are relaxed any further, then this site will go down a similar road to FD's other site, that being PA, Which frankly leaves a lot to be desired!

However, this is FD's site, so if he wants this site to go down the same path as PA, then that's his decision.

That said, I will not entertain going any further down that path, whatsoever!


I voted 'Keep it' for that exact reason.  You give some people an inch, they will take a mile as you have seen with my 'imposter.'  I'd toughen it up to make a clear statement of zero tolerance towards going down a primrose path to the almost empty but open fetid sewer that other place is.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 74308
Gender: male
Re: swear word filter
Reply #6 - Jun 18th, 2016 at 11:35am
 
get rid of it. There isn't one word on there that people can't find ways around if they choose to.
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
Andrei.Hicks
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 23818
Carlsbad, CA
Gender: male
Re: swear word filter
Reply #7 - Jun 18th, 2016 at 9:09pm
 
I think some words should be out of bounds.
Rednecks C word suggestion being right, but otherwise I don't think it's needed.
This isn't a kids site.
Back to top
 

Anyone who lives within their means suffers from a lack of imagination - Oscar Wilde
 
IP Logged
 
Aussie
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 38553
Gender: male
Re: swear word filter
Reply #8 - Jun 18th, 2016 at 9:33pm
 
Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jun 18th, 2016 at 9:09pm:
I think some words should be out of bounds.
Rednecks C word suggestion being right, but otherwise I don't think it's needed.
This isn't a kids site.


Sure...but kids can access it. 

And if you reckon you have had enough of complaints about conduct here under the current Rules, expect an avalanche if you give people, like one I don't need to name, an inch.

Further, the place will empty out, believe me.  There are other sites Mr Hicks where no-one is subjected to crap as you propose.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jovial Monk
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Dogs not cats!

Posts: 45982
Gender: male
Re: swear word filter
Reply #9 - Jun 19th, 2016 at 11:16am
 
As I said, FD has grown to really like the smell of poo.
Back to top
 

Get the vaxx! 💉💉

If you don’t like abortions ignore them like you do school shootings.
 
IP Logged
 
bogarde73
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Anti-Global & Contra Mundum

Posts: 18443
Gender: male
Re: swear word filter
Reply #10 - Jun 19th, 2016 at 11:54am
 
Aussie wrote on Jun 18th, 2016 at 11:24am:
perceptions_now wrote on Jun 18th, 2016 at 11:01am:
In my opinion, everything has limits, including WHAT & HOW we say.

If the current limits in place on this site are relaxed any further, then this site will go down a similar road to FD's other site, that being PA, Which frankly leaves a lot to be desired!

However, this is FD's site, so if he wants this site to go down the same path as PA, then that's his decision.

That said, I will not entertain going any further down that path, whatsoever!


I voted 'Keep it' for that exact reason.  You give some people an inch, they will take a mile as you have seen with my 'imposter.'  I'd toughen it up to make a clear statement of zero tolerance towards going down a primrose path to the almost empty but open fetid sewer that other place is.


I agree with both of you. Surrender to the lowest common denominator is never a good option.
Back to top
 

Know the enemies of a civil society by their public behaviour, by their fraudulent claim to be liberal-progressive, by their propensity to lie and, above all, by their attachment to authoritarianism.
 
IP Logged
 
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 34441
Gender: male
Re: swear word filter
Reply #11 - Jun 19th, 2016 at 2:29pm
 
Andrei.Hicks wrote on Jun 18th, 2016 at 9:09pm:
I think some words should be out of bounds.
Rednecks C word suggestion being right, but otherwise I don't think it's needed.
This isn't a kids site.


That sums it up for me.

However, the use of foul language should be restrained to a bare minimum and not used with rampant profligacy.

If for no other reason than that ladies are present.   Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
issuevoter
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9200
The Great State of Mind
Gender: male
Re: swear word filter
Reply #12 - Jun 20th, 2016 at 9:52pm
 
I am not voting. I will abide by any ruling, but I find the present policy ironic. F88K is banned, but bugger is perfectly acceptable. Reminds me of the time I heard a suburban grandmother admonishing an innocent little girl I would guess her own flesh and blood, "You little bugger." She also called the child "Bugger Lugs." You wonder why Australians grow up with such foul mouths? Its because they don't think about what they are saying.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jun 20th, 2016 at 10:00pm by issuevoter »  

No political allegiance. No philosophy. No religion.
 
IP Logged
 
Lord Herbert
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 34441
Gender: male
Re: swear word filter
Reply #13 - Jun 21st, 2016 at 1:30pm
 
For Marla to reach her unbridled full stride she needs all of those colourful Anglo-Saxon words. It's the least we can do for her as a regular ranter here.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
polite_gandalf
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20027
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: swear word filter
Reply #14 - Jun 22nd, 2016 at 11:46am
 
issuevoter wrote on Jun 20th, 2016 at 9:52pm:
I am not voting. I will abide by any ruling, but I find the present policy ironic. F88K is banned, but bugger is perfectly acceptable. Reminds me of the time I heard a suburban grandmother admonishing an innocent little girl I would guess her own flesh and blood, "You little bugger." She also called the child "Bugger Lugs." You wonder why Australians grow up with such foul mouths? Its because they don't think about what they are saying.


n***** is banned, and there is a reasonable justification for that - racist white supremists might go googling for that very term, and then start running rampant on the forums they find where people are talking about it. You certainly wouldn't want your forum to become a magnet for such people. And yet, funnily enough Abo, boong and coon aren't banned - even though IMO they are just as offensive.

Back to top
 

A resident Islam critic who claims to represent western values said:
Quote:
Outlawing the enemy's uniform - hijab, islamic beard - is not depriving one's own people of their freedoms.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Send Topic Print