Trump visited Scotland on Friday and proceeded to talk about how the historic Brexit vote might help business there and then went on to congratulate Scots for “taking their country back” even though Scotland voted overwhelmingly to remain in the EU.

Heaven help the civilised world if this idiot becomes President.

http://globalnews.ca/news/2787023/donald-trump-gets-social-media-thrashing-for-s...

Trump is the epitome of the stereotypical ugly American.

An obnoxious, loud narcissist who tries to sell stupidity as 'plain speaking'.

How does it go? "I been hearing some things... People have been talking... I don't know for sure but what I've heard people saying... Is that all around a pig's ass is pork. Now I don't know for sure, I'm not a Jew. And I'm ok with Jews... I love the Jew... What's that food they eat? Something mixed with chicken... But that's ok... All I'm saying is that we've gotta look into it... That's all I'm sayin ".

Trump is an idiot.

He doesn't deserve to be the president.

Obama has really lowered the bar on what it takes to be President. Trump can't help but be a refreshing improvement if elected.

Mortdooley wrote on Jun 26^th, 2016 at 11:06pm:


I think you forgot about George W Bush.  You can't get much lower than that.

NorthOfNorth wrote on Jun 26^th, 2016 at 7:15pm:



No, he is worse. Much worse.

...and it gets more ridiculous:

Jim Bakker is still on TV?



Apparently he's the old guy with the beard. Never would have recognized him. And apparently he's now got a "Bomb shelter food" racket going, just in case the Rapture doesn't happen before the Tribulation, apparently.

Anyway, God supposedly has now endorsed Herr Ruggenfuhrer, or something.

Riiight, morty torty. As if electing a Canadian national didn't already exemplify the mentality of Texuus already

Mortdooley wrote on Jun 27^th, 2016 at 4:55am:


Texuus voted for a Canadian national ...?

Mortdooley wrote on Jun 27^th, 2016 at 4:55am:


I'm sorry morty torty. Will blaming Obama for everything help?

Mortdooley wrote on Jun 27^th, 2016 at 5:07am:




Maybe Marla is a mexican rapist.

Mortdooley wrote on Jun 27^th, 2016 at 9:14am:



Muslim terrorist?

Frank wrote on Jun 28^th, 2016 at 7:13pm:

Aye, that it is.

Marla wrote on Jun 27^th, 2016 at 5:01am:

Perhaps so. Blaming Bush for everything certainly worked for Obama and his party.

The4thEstate wrote on Jun 29^th, 2016 at 12:06am:




Leftardism is a religion and Hillary is regarded as a God of that religion and just like the God of the Holy Bible that murdered children and perpetrated numerous other appalling and heinous acts Gods are given a free pass to commit as much evil as they like by their followers.

NorthOfNorth wrote on Jun 29^th, 2016 at 6:11am:

OK, since my post was apparently too subtle, here are the basics:

Imitating a poor black Southern American when you're a rich white Northern politician is the height of pandering and phoniness.

It's as if I were to come in here and, in hopes of better relating to the predominantly Australian crowd, started spouting the kind of slang that would immediately identify me as an unhip poser.

Like maybe addressing every female in the forum as "Sheila" and constantly punctuating my points with "Fair dinkum, mate!"

Trump is spot on for a very significant proportion of the electorate in the US and around the world - see Brexit, see any number of anti-establishmentarian voices and movements around the world..

The Twitterati and the bien pensant (is there a difference?)  can shite on that, belittle it, dismiss it but it remains a fact.

It's a democracy. Come up with a better argument or carry on sneering at at a significant proportion of the electorate. But remember - sneering and screeching is not an argument. As Brexit has shown, sensible people do not listen to sneering and screeching.

This is the way to show outright ignorance.

Quote:


The Brits are whinging about Poles and other Eastern European buggers. What court system do they seek to impose.  They are bitching about Hindus.  What court system do they seek to impose.  They are bitching about black people.  What court system do they seek to impose. They are birching about a diffident non homogeneous mob we call Arabs.  What court system do they seek to impose.

Have to ask.  Are you a yank, living in the USA? 

Aussie wrote on Jun 29^th, 2016 at 8:57pm:

No, THIS is the way to show outright ignorance:

Aussie wrote on Jun 29^th, 2016 at 8:57pm:

See the little words underneath my "Team America: World Police" icon? See the third line -- the one that says, "Flyover Country, U.S.A."?

Ding-ding-ding ... those last three letters are your first hint!

As for your laundry list of immigrants in the U.K. and repeated question -- "What court system they seek to impose?" -- I refer you back to my original comment and suggest you read the big words more slowly this time. Don't bother scrolling; I'll throw you a bone. Here's my exact statement:

"Since when do they have to ignore their borders and accept all comers, particularly those who not only fail to assimilate, but insist on imposing their own court system?"

See the word "particularly"? That's your clue that I'm not talking about EVERY immigrant group or MOST immigrant groups, and perhaps not even more than ONE immigrant group.

I am referring only to "those [immigrants] who not only fail to assimilate, but insist on imposing their own court system." And who might that include?

Well, 5 seconds of Googling will school you on the fact that, in the words of a December 2015 Daily Mail article with this  headline: "There are now EIGHTY-FIVE Islamic courts dispensing 'justice' across the UK."

Only the truly ignorant would fail to understand that.

And gee, does the name "Aussie" imply that you're an Australian?? Living in Australia?? Just a wild guess!

The4thEstate wrote on Jun 30^th, 2016 at 3:26am:

Australia got somewhat of a 'rude awakening' to the difference in PC levels between Australia and the US when Harry Connick Jr was asked to 'judge' a comical mock 'talent show' which was part of a popular television show.

The 'act' he was presented with was a group painted in black faces and calling themselves the 'Jackson Jive'.. Most of us in Australia saw it as just good fun, but Harry saw it differently and wasn't backward in coming forward about it.

The4thEstate wrote on Jun 30^th, 2016 at 3:02am:


So, it was, as I suspected, just another Muslim bash from you.  There really is no need for you to post on that subject.  It is obvious it will be just more of the same, regurgitated, no matter the Thread title.

As for location, whatever I have under my avatar is not proof that I am not a penguin.

Now that you have asked me, I confess I really am a penguin, and hang out at the South Pole.

NorthOfNorth wrote on Jun 30^th, 2016 at 6:18am:

Oh yeah, if Harry hadn't have objected, the PC Police would have never forgiven him for that one, and his career in the U.S. would have been toast.

Aussie wrote on Jun 30^th, 2016 at 5:17pm:


Yeah, let's talk about you, why don't we?  But luckily it's not about you. 

Equality before the law  - note the singular.  Just because you are ignorant and can't be fagged doesn't mean that multiple laws within a single jurisdiction is a good idea.

The4thEstate wrote on Jun 30^th, 2016 at 5:09pm:

In the context of his being American, I'd bet he would have been.

But its not just with the US where the difference lies...

The term 'Paki' is extremely offensive in the UK. In Australia the 'Pakis' means the Pakistani cricket team.

When they are in Australia competing with us, you might find signs that read 'The Pakis are coming' (meant without the intent of offense), which apparently, for a laugh, British tourists have their picture taken with the sign visible in the background.

NorthOfNorth wrote on Jun 30^th, 2016 at 9:29pm:

And in the U.S., the term "Paki" means nothing. Say it to the average Yank and he may think you're talking about something to do with moving or shipping.

But on the subject of "terms that mean different things in different countries," a British lady who moved to the States raised some eyebrows when she invited a male co-worker to "knock me up in the morning."

Apparently she intended it to mean "call and wake me up," but on this side of the pond it means "impregnate me."

The4thEstate wrote on Jul 1^st, 2016 at 9:05am:

Yes, I think we'd all go for similar to you here too... Although we might term it more like... having a root.

Lord Herbert wrote on Jul 1^st, 2016 at 9:33am:

You just underscored my point about why so many Brits went Brexit.

I'm sure it also doesn't do wonders for Pakistani P.R. when reports like the Rotherham scandal surface in the media.

Like this excerpt from an October 2015 story in the Daily Express: "Last August a devastating independent report was published revealing how at least 1,400 girls as young as 11 were groomed and sexually exploited over a 14-year period by gangs of predominantly Pakistani men."

What's amusing is that much of the British media commonly refers to Pakistani Muslims as simply "Asians."

NorthOfNorth wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2016 at 7:00am:
,

I couldn't give a rat's arse if it is, and that's because if calling a spade a spade or a Pakistani a 'Paki' is offensive to someone, then they are living in the wrong country and should think of going home where the music, the food, the language, the customs, the religion, and the clothing is exactly how they have recreated it in their British ghettoes.

Marla wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2016 at 12:45pm:


Did you realise Marla that referring to our Australian Aboriginal brethren as "abos" is also considered racist by the PC left?

However, Australians shorten everything (it's not cause we're lazy; the air is so thick with flies we do our best to keep our mouths shut, hence the necessity of shortening words). Hence, "afternoon" becomes "arvo", "good day" becomes "gidday" and "aboriginal" becomes "abo".

Therefore, you see, calling our Aboriginal brothers "abo" is not racist. However, "boong" is most certainly racist. And do you know why abos are called "boongs", marla?




It's the sound they make when they bounce of your roo bar.


That, my friend, is racist. What Herbert has written above, is most certainly not.

Have a nice day.

Most kind of you to intercede on my behalf, Nicole - but Marla, bogarde, and my good self have been involved in a ménage à trois on this board now for quite some time - which needless to say has thoroughly outraged and scandalised the Old Tarts here like Neferti, Mothra, Codsey-baby and sundry others ...  

Marla wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2016 at 1:46pm:


Don't say that, or Aquascoot will be along shortly to give you further instructions on how to upgrade yourself from being a beta-filly to an alpha-mare ...

Quote:


Urban myth.

Officially it came out of the 40s and 50's - origin unknown.

Marla wrote on Jul 2^nd, 2016 at 1:46pm:


My apologies.

I did, of course, mean 'Miss Congenial Colorado' .

"I personally witnessed the Plaintiff being forced to perform various sexual acts with Donald J. Trump and Mr. Epstein. Both Mr. Trump and Mr. Epstein were advised that she was 13 years old."

This is bogarde's hero.

The4thEstate wrote on Jul 1^st, 2016 at 3:46pm:

If we used that term here, no doubt we'd abbreviate to 'spat the paki'... Thereby helping Brits in the Australia to another moment of comical cross-purpose chatter!