Australian Politics Forum - Trump on terrorism

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 137833
Gender: male

Re: Trump on terrorism
Reply #15 - Jul 4^th, 2016 at 2:30pm

bogarde73 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 2:09pm:

Greg will make any argument, trot out any irrelevant facts ...

"irrelevant"?

Explain yourself, boges.

This thread is about terrorism in the USA.

The figure I quoted is part of the terrorism Trump talks about:

"The terrorist threat has never been greater. Our enemies are brutal and ruthless and will do anything to murder those who do not bend to their will. We must take steps now to protect America from terrorists, and do everything in our power to improve our security to keep America safe."

So, why do you think it's "irrelevant"?

Do you condone political right wing terrorism?

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 137833
Gender: male

Re: Trump on terrorism
Reply #16 - Jul 4^th, 2016 at 2:32pm

ian wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 2:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 9:38am:

Yadda wrote on Jun 29^th, 2016 at 12:28pm:

e.g.
I can't see any mention of the word, either ISLAM, or 'moslem', in that statement by Trump ?

He's talking about terrorism, not religion.

Terrorism isn't confined to religion (or even one particular religion).

In the US, political right wing terrorism is also a serious problem.

Between 1995 and 2014, for example, right wing terrorists have killed almost 1,000 people in the US.

To believe that terrorism only comes from Islam is extremely naive, to say the least.

Muslim terrorists killed more than 3 times that number in one attack on US soil. not to mention the US citizens massacred abroad by Muslim terrorists.

Correct.

That's no reason to ignore political right wing terrorism, though.

It always amazes me when people go out of their way to defend terrorists who aren't Muslims.

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 95915
Gender: male

Re: Trump on terrorism
Reply #17 - Jul 4^th, 2016 at 2:39pm

bogarde73 wrote on Jun 30^th, 2016 at 4:13pm:

Of course they are Donald!

Trump said on Fox that a lot of the tens of thousands of Syrians the proto- muslim Obama is bringing into the country are ISIS members.

Well at the very least I'd say they'd be ISIS sympathisers. And as Soros says, images of violent migrants are what swung the Brexit vote, for which he's now blaming Merkel. The globalists are turning on each other.

So, Donald, you keep pumping out that rhetoric and hang it both on Obama and Clinton and it will do you no damage at all.
Except among the globalists and the leftists media . . .and f ck them.

Jolly good. Sept 11 was perpetrated by terrorists on student visas. They weren't immigrants, refugees or otherwise. They were from the UK and Germany, so they weren't from Muslim countries either.

So I ask you this: how would a ban on immigrants from Muslim countries prevent terrorism?

As usual, Bogie, I'm curious.

Back to top

IP Logged

bogarde73 Gold Member Offline Anti-Global & Contra Mundum Posts: 18443 Gender:	Re: Trump on terrorism Reply #18 - Jul 4^th, 2016 at 2:57pm You're curious alright, in the sense of being a curiosity. You pretend not to be, but I strongly suspect you are muslim. You pose as female, but I suspect that is untrue. Maybe you're one of the latest model LGBT range.
Back to top	Know the enemies of a civil society by their public behaviour, by their fraudulent claim to be liberal-progressive, by their propensity to lie and, above all, by their attachment to authoritarianism. IP Logged

bogarde73

Gold Member

Offline

Anti-Global & Contra Mundum

Posts: 18443
Gender: male

Re: Trump on terrorism
Reply #19 - Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:02pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 2:30pm:

[quote author=bogarde73 link=1467166616/11#11 date=1467605382]Greg will make any argument, trot out any irrelevant facts ...

"irrelevant"?

Explain yourself, boges.

This thread is about terrorism in the USA.

The figure I quoted is part of the terrorism Trump talks about:

"The terrorist threat has never been greater. Our enemies are brutal and ruthless and will do anything to murder those who do not bend to their will. We must take steps now to protect America from terrorists, and do everything in our power to improve our security to keep America safe."

So, why do you think it's "irrelevant"?

Do you condone political right wing terrorism?[/quote]

You know perfectly well I don't, not that there may not come a time.
But why do you raise this? It is irrelevant because to talk about terrorism today is to talk about radical Islamic terrorism and everybody, except you apparently, realises this.
What do you want to talk about - the shot heard round the world perhaps? The bomb thrown at the Tsar?

Back to top

Know the enemies of a civil society by their public behaviour, by their fraudulent claim to be liberal-progressive, by their propensity to lie and, above all, by their attachment to authoritarianism.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 137833
Gender: male

Re: Trump on terrorism
Reply #20 - Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:06pm

bogarde73 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:02pm:

But why do you raise this? It is irrelevant because to talk about terrorism today is to talk about radical Islamic terrorism and everybody, except you apparently, realises this.

Incorrect.

Between 1995 and 2014, for example, right wing terrorists killed almost 1,000 people in the US.

You're trying awfully hard to cover up these acts of terrorism.

Why is that?

Back to top

IP Logged

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: Trump on terrorism
Reply #21 - Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:08pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:06pm:

bogarde73 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:02pm:

But why do you raise this? It is irrelevant because to talk about terrorism today is to talk about radical Islamic terrorism and everybody, except you apparently, realises this.

Incorrect.

Between 1995 and 2014, for example, right wing terrorists killed almost 1,000 people in the US.

You're trying awfully hard to cover up these acts of terrorism.

Why is that?

got a link numptoid?

Back to top

IP Logged

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: Trump on terrorism
Reply #22 - Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:17pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:08pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:06pm:

bogarde73 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:02pm:

But why do you raise this? It is irrelevant because to talk about terrorism today is to talk about radical Islamic terrorism and everybody, except you apparently, realises this.

Incorrect.

Between 1995 and 2014, for example, right wing terrorists killed almost 1,000 people in the US.

You're trying awfully hard to cover up these acts of terrorism.

Why is that?

got a link numptoid?

Hello Pecca. 1,000????? Grin

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 95915
Gender: male

Re: Trump on terrorism
Reply #23 - Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:21pm

bogarde73 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 2:57pm:

You're curious alright, in the sense of being a curiosity.
You pretend not to be, but I strongly suspect you are muslim.
You pose as female, but I suspect that is untrue. Maybe you're one of the latest model LGBT range.

Suspect away, Bogie. I suspect you're an immigrant.

We grew here you flew here, no?

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 137833
Gender: male

Re: Trump on terrorism
Reply #24 - Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:22pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:17pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:08pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:06pm:

bogarde73 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:02pm:

But why do you raise this? It is irrelevant because to talk about terrorism today is to talk about radical Islamic terrorism and everybody, except you apparently, realises this.

Incorrect.

Between 1995 and 2014, for example, right wing terrorists killed almost 1,000 people in the US.

You're trying awfully hard to cover up these acts of terrorism.

Why is that?

got a link numptoid?

Hello Pecca. 1,000????? Grin

Almost 1,000 deaths and injuries.

Back to top

IP Logged

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: Trump on terrorism
Reply #25 - Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:26pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:22pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:17pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:08pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:06pm:

bogarde73 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:02pm:

But why do you raise this? It is irrelevant because to talk about terrorism today is to talk about radical Islamic terrorism and everybody, except you apparently, realises this.

Incorrect.

Between 1995 and 2014, for example, right wing terrorists killed almost 1,000 people in the US.

You're trying awfully hard to cover up these acts of terrorism.

Why is that?

got a link numptoid?

Hello Pecca. 1,000????? Grin

Almost 1,000 deaths and injuries.

Now deaths AND injuries!!! Grin

Almost a 1,000 deaths. Grin

Says YOU?????Evidence!!!

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 137833
Gender: male

Re: Trump on terrorism
Reply #26 - Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:29pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:26pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:22pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:17pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:08pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:06pm:

bogarde73 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:02pm:

But why do you raise this? It is irrelevant because to talk about terrorism today is to talk about radical Islamic terrorism and everybody, except you apparently, realises this.

Incorrect.

Between 1995 and 2014, for example, right wing terrorists killed almost 1,000 people in the US.

You're trying awfully hard to cover up these acts of terrorism.

Why is that?

got a link numptoid?

Hello Pecca. 1,000????? Grin

Almost 1,000 deaths and injuries.

Now deaths AND injuries!!! Grin

Almost a 1,000 deaths. Grin

Says YOU?????Evidence!!!

Correct.

Almost 1,000 deaths and injuries.

981 is the correct figure, if memory serves me correct.

You seem to be going out of your way to defend these acts of terrorism.

Why is that?

Back to top

IP Logged

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: Trump on terrorism
Reply #27 - Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:32pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:29pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:26pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:22pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:17pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:08pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:06pm:

bogarde73 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:02pm:

But why do you raise this? It is irrelevant because to talk about terrorism today is to talk about radical Islamic terrorism and everybody, except you apparently, realises this.

Incorrect.

Between 1995 and 2014, for example, right wing terrorists killed almost 1,000 people in the US.

You're trying awfully hard to cover up these acts of terrorism.

Why is that?

got a link numptoid?

Hello Pecca. 1,000????? Grin

Almost 1,000 deaths and injuries.

Now deaths AND injuries!!! Grin

Almost a 1,000 deaths. Grin

Says YOU?????Evidence!!!

Correct.

Almost 1,000 deaths and injuries.

981 is the correct figure, if memory serves me correct.

You seem to be going out of your way to defend these acts of terrorism.

Why is that?

Pecca- Between 1995 and 2014, for example, right wing terrorists killed almost 1,000 people in the US.

Now I want the evidence!!

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 137833
Gender: male

Re: Trump on terrorism
Reply #28 - Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:34pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:32pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:29pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:26pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:22pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:17pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:08pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:06pm:

bogarde73 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:02pm:

But why do you raise this? It is irrelevant because to talk about terrorism today is to talk about radical Islamic terrorism and everybody, except you apparently, realises this.

Incorrect.

Between 1995 and 2014, for example, right wing terrorists killed almost 1,000 people in the US.

You're trying awfully hard to cover up these acts of terrorism.

Why is that?

got a link numptoid?

Hello Pecca. 1,000????? Grin

Almost 1,000 deaths and injuries.

Now deaths AND injuries!!! Grin

Almost a 1,000 deaths. Grin

Says YOU?????Evidence!!!

Correct.

Almost 1,000 deaths and injuries.

981 is the correct figure, if memory serves me correct.

You seem to be going out of your way to defend these acts of terrorism.

Why is that?

Pecca- Between 1995 and 2014, for example, right wing terrorists killed almost 1,000 people in the US.

Now I want the evidence!!

About 981.

Why are you defending these attacks?

Back to top

IP Logged

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: Trump on terrorism
Reply #29 - Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:35pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:34pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:32pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:29pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:26pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:22pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:17pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:08pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:06pm:

bogarde73 wrote on Jul 4^th, 2016 at 3:02pm:

But why do you raise this? It is irrelevant because to talk about terrorism today is to talk about radical Islamic terrorism and everybody, except you apparently, realises this.

Incorrect.

Between 1995 and 2014, for example, right wing terrorists killed almost 1,000 people in the US.

You're trying awfully hard to cover up these acts of terrorism.

Why is that?

got a link numptoid?

Hello Pecca. 1,000????? Grin

Almost 1,000 deaths and injuries.

Now deaths AND injuries!!! Grin

Almost a 1,000 deaths. Grin

Says YOU?????Evidence!!!

Correct.

Almost 1,000 deaths and injuries.

981 is the correct figure, if memory serves me correct.

You seem to be going out of your way to defend these acts of terrorism.

Why is that?

Pecca- Between 1995 and 2014, for example, right wing terrorists killed almost 1,000 people in the US.

Now I want the evidence!!

About 981.

Why are you defending these attacks?

About 981??? Grin

Back to top

IP Logged