mothra wrote on Jul 10
th, 2016 at 8:24pm:
Black Orchid wrote on Jul 10
th, 2016 at 8:07pm:
mothra wrote on Jul 10
th, 2016 at 8:05pm:
Black Orchid wrote on Jul 10
th, 2016 at 7:57pm:
She amended her statement and went back 12 hours later to tell the truth at a friend's instigation. The friend was worried that other women would also be abused, and rightly so.
She didn't all of a sudden grow a conscience. More than likely the friend was intending to tell the police the truth himself/herself in order to bring these animals to justice.
Pure speculation.
As are your comments to the contrary.
Not quite. Would you like to try again?
Why do you say that? Your "evidence" to the contrary consists solely of you stating your opinion.
And that's fine -- this is, after all, an opinion forum -- but let's not pretend that your opinion carries any more weight or significance than Black Orchid's.
Oh wait, you think you offered some kind of proof. Your exact words were these:
mothra wrote on Jul 10
th, 2016 at 7:38pm:
Well i strongly disagree. I think it is perfectly understandable that she wasn't thinking clearly, as is verified by the fact she amended her statement 12hrs later.
If she wa"furthering her agenda", would she do that? Really?
She might.
There are any number of ways we could read her decision to amend her statement 12 hours later. Yours is one possibility, but another possibility is that she 'fessed up because she feared that the truth was about to come out anyway, and that it would damage her credibility, given her position as a prominent left-wing youth movement activist.
Of course it's basically speculation, but how is your speculation (and your reasoning behind it) any more valid than Black Orchid's?