polite_gandalf wrote on Jul 10
th, 2016 at 5:37pm:
Actually the speculation is your domain estate, not mine. And I don't have to "prove" you are wrong when its you coming up with the accusations, not me.
No, you don't have to prove me wrong. But you do have to prove yourself right.
I offered my own theory on her behavior and her motivation behind it, based on the available evidence that backs me up.
Do you seriously think you deserve a free pass when you offer nothing more than your own theory about her behavior?
polite_gandalf wrote on Jul 10
th, 2016 at 9:20pm:
Its pretty obvious to me her decision to lie at that point was a spontaneous, knee jerk reaction to the offense she took from the police assuming it was refugees. And the theory that it was a spontaneous and irrational reaction caused largely by the traumatised state she was in, is supported by the fact that 12 hours later she came to her senses and retracted it.
That's all very nice as theories go, but don't get all full of yourself when it comes to disparaging my posts when this is all you've got in the way of supporting evidence. It wouldn't exactly make a judge slap his forehead and rule in your favor.
polite_gandalf wrote on Jul 10
th, 2016 at 5:37pm:
We can go round and round forever, but it won't alter the fact that you are coming up with a baseless accusation (ie that she considers rape less important than racism) which you can't substantiate.
B.S. -- her own behavior substantiates the fact that when given the chance to report the rapists, she blamed Germans instead, fearing that an honest account would encourage racism.
Again, whether or not she still feels that way is open to speculation, but don't try to pretend that there's no evidence that she once was more concerned about racists than rapists. I just gave it to you, and it's more than you've presented on behalf of your own theory.
polite_gandalf wrote on Jul 10
th, 2016 at 5:37pm:
Have a good day.
Likewise.