Brian Ross wrote on Jul 10
th, 2016 at 9:20pm:
aquascoot wrote on Jul 10
th, 2016 at 7:51pm:
i'm not frightened by women who are assertive Brian.
Your statements would indicate otherwise, Acquascoot.
Quote:I'm just not impressed by women who are emotional.
Women tend to be more emotional (though many beta males also fall into this feminine frame).
And people who have not "mastered their emotions" should not lead, not because they arent assertive, but because they arent "mindful".
How do you become mindful....thru years of grinding it out, being subjected to brutal evolutionary pressure.
That means someone who has risen thru the ranks of the military or risen thru the ranks of business.
these people have been shaped by this training and now they are fit to lead.
Most women in politics have not followed this route (with the exception of Julie Bishop).
Most come from academia or the public sector.
Pauline is one of the few who have come through business. If she had opened a chain of Fish and Chip franchises.. Mc Hansens or something, then i would see a woman who was climbing the ladder, who was on the narrow road to succuess. But far as i can tell she never went anywhere. She might as well have joined the public service and just been a mediocre person like all the women in the labor party (i include kevin Rudd in that..he was the most unmanly man in politics).
It is hard to respect mediocre people and entrust them with leadership.
You use a narrow definition of "assertiveness", Acquascoot.
I have known women in academia, in the home, in the military and in business who have been "assertive" while still not being imitation men - which is essentially what you appear to desire them to be. Some have used their emotions to good effect. Some not so much. Still didn't stop them from asserting themselves and getting their point across.
Hanson is I agree overly emotional. She believes everybody should be a jingoist and wrap themselves in the flag. That is just emotive and of course theatrical. She believes we are "in danger of being swamped by Asians", yet it hasn't happened, nor will it happen and even if it did, what business is it of hers? If all Asian immigrants become Australians, they have a right to an equal democratic right to her. She is not the Queen of Australia, nor is she ever likely to be the PM. She is inferring that
Australians of Asian descent are somehow dangerous to Australia as a nation. Why? Because she is a racist and a bigot. QED.
this is an interesting point and needs clarifying.
Asians are not dangerous to australia ,
asians are going to challenge australians to get on the ladder to success or get left behind.
Now listen carefully, she isnt disliking them because she is racist and feels superior and neither are her supporters.
True.
They dislike asians because the asian is superior.
Dislike? Nope. Boy are you racist or what
The asian has a better work ethic,
Nope
he is more mindful, he does Tai Chi and meditates, he eats better. He is going to whip their a*ss and they dont want to have to step up.
God you post rubbish.
So their thinking is low consciousness.
But the thinking of the leftard is also low consciousness.
the leftard wants lots of protection for those at the bottom, those who wont climb the ladder, the unionists, the welfare recipients, all the victim groups.
the leftard too, just like pauline, is in lower consciousness and lets the lazy part of his personality "trick" his brain into thinking he is being kind and compassionate when really the kind and compassionate and HARDER thing to do is to challenge people and treat them with tough love to teach them resilience and self respect.
You Sir have serious issues...
So pauline and her brand of patriots and socialists and their brand of leaners are both completely off the narrow road to success
yet she was a successful business woman all on her own... oh dear Scoot, seems you will have to reassess eh
.
Forum
Pages: 
