Australian Politics Forum - Still MORE Validation for Pauline

Neferti Gold Member Offline Posts: 7965 Canberra Gender:	Re: Still MORE Validation for Pauline Reply #90 - Jul 13^th, 2016 at 6:59pm You are, as always, KILLING this Forum as well, Aussie, with your attitude. You do it EVERY TIME. How many Forums have you killed now? Let me count them: 1. 2. 3. 4. NOBODY wants a smartarse pretend lawyer telling us what we can and cannot do. GO AWAY.
Back to top	IP Logged

Saul Goodman Full Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 132 Gender:	Re: Still MORE Validation for Pauline Reply #91 - Jul 13^th, 2016 at 7:05pm I like Pauline. at least she is honest.
Back to top	"It's all good man!" IP Logged

Gordon Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 20738 Gordon Gender:	Re: Still MORE Validation for Pauline Reply #92 - Jul 13^th, 2016 at 7:11pm Saul Goodman wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 7:05pm: I like Pauline. at least she is honest. Hi Slippin Jimmy.
Back to top	IBI IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38847
Gender: male

Re: Still MORE Validation for Pauline
Reply #93 - Jul 13^th, 2016 at 7:12pm

Neferti wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 6:59pm:

You are, as always, KILLING this Forum as well, Aussie, with your attitude.

You do it EVERY TIME. How many Forums have you killed now? Let me count them:

1.
2.
3.
4.

NOBODY wants a smartarse pretend lawyer telling us what we can and cannot do.

GO AWAY.

I agree. It is far preferable that we have a pretend Ophthalmologist who is married to a Lawyer and who has a daughter who is a highly qualified medical specialist doing that.

Can you help us out here, Nappy?

Tongue

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 96446	Re: Still MORE Validation for Pauline Reply #94 - Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:03pm Saul Goodman wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 7:05pm: I like Pauline. at least she is honest. Some of Pauline’s best friends are dirty Boongs too, eh?
Back to top	IP Logged

bogarde73

Gold Member

Offline

Anti-Global & Contra Mundum

Posts: 18443
Gender: male

Re: Still MORE Validation for Pauline
Reply #95 - Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:10pm

That's the kind of pseudo-slick comeback you almost get away with Karnal.

It is patently clear from the votes that Pauline speaks for a sizeable part of the electorate
Taking account of the limited organisation, I'd say she represents at least the equivalent of the green's support and look at the representation they've had.

One Nation has earned and deserve their voice.

Back to top

Know the enemies of a civil society by their public behaviour, by their fraudulent claim to be liberal-progressive, by their propensity to lie and, above all, by their attachment to authoritarianism.

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38847
Gender: male

Re: Still MORE Validation for Pauline
Reply #96 - Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:14pm

bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:10pm:

That's the kind of pseudo-slick comeback you almost get away with Karnal.

It is patently clear from the votes that Pauline speaks for a sizeable part of the electorate
Taking account of the limited organisation, I'd say she represents at least the equivalent of the green's support and look at the representation they've had.

One Nation has earned and deserve their voice.

From how many mouths will that voice vent? Do you know?

Back to top

IP Logged

Gordon

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20738
Gordon
Gender: male

Re: Still MORE Validation for Pauline
Reply #97 - Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:14pm

bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:10pm:

That's the kind of pseudo-slick comeback you almost get away with Karnal.

It is patently clear from the votes that Pauline speaks for a sizeable part of the electorate
Taking account of the limited organisation, I'd say she represents at least the equivalent of the green's support and look at the representation they've had.

One Nation has earned and deserve their voice.

When you take into account she's an inarticulate nong and she still got the votes. Imagine if we had the likes of a geert wilders

Back to top

IBI

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96446

Re: Still MORE Validation for Pauline
Reply #98 - Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:15pm

bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:10pm:

That's the kind of pseudo-slick comeback you almost get away with Karnal.

It is patently clear from the votes that Pauline speaks for a sizeable part of the electorate
Taking account of the limited organisation, I'd say she represents at least the equivalent of the green's support and look at the representation they've had.

One Nation has earned and deserve their voice.

Right you are, Bogie.

And if anyone wants to question her policies, WE DON’T WANT THEM HERE.

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96446

Re: Still MORE Validation for Pauline
Reply #99 - Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:17pm

Gordon wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:14pm:

bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:10pm:

That's the kind of pseudo-slick comeback you almost get away with Karnal.

It is patently clear from the votes that Pauline speaks for a sizeable part of the electorate
Taking account of the limited organisation, I'd say she represents at least the equivalent of the green's support and look at the representation they've had.

One Nation has earned and deserve their voice.

When you take into account she's an inarticulate nong and she still got the votes. Imagine if we had the likes of a geert wilders

Ban this one, moderators. He’s going against the will of the Australian people.

Back to top

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96446

Re: Still MORE Validation for Pauline
Reply #100 - Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:18pm

Aussie wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:14pm:

bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:10pm:

That's the kind of pseudo-slick comeback you almost get away with Karnal.

It is patently clear from the votes that Pauline speaks for a sizeable part of the electorate
Taking account of the limited organisation, I'd say she represents at least the equivalent of the green's support and look at the representation they've had.

One Nation has earned and deserve their voice.

From how many mouths will that voice vent? Do you know?

I’m not sure, but I guarantee this argument appears in a Bolt column, if it hasn’t already.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139232
Gender: male

Re: Still MORE Validation for Pauline
Reply #101 - Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:21pm

bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:10pm:

It is patently clear from the votes that Pauline speaks for a sizeable part of the electorate

Nope.

Just a little over 4% of those who voted on July 2nd voted for One Nation.

She's an irrelevant, ignorant, bigoted, xenophobic, Islamophobic, racist.

And believe me, those are her good points.

Back to top

IP Logged

bogarde73

Gold Member

Offline

Anti-Global & Contra Mundum

Posts: 18443
Gender: male

Re: Still MORE Validation for Pauline
Reply #102 - Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:22pm

Karnal wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:15pm:

bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:10pm:

That's the kind of pseudo-slick comeback you almost get away with Karnal.

It is patently clear from the votes that Pauline speaks for a sizeable part of the electorate
Taking account of the limited organisation, I'd say she represents at least the equivalent of the green's support and look at the representation they've had.

One Nation has earned and deserve their voice.

Right you are, Bogie.

And if anyone wants to question her policies, WE DON’T WANT THEM HERE.

Of course anybody can question everybody's viewpoint Karnal.
Just as we can question the morality, justice and fitness of your Islamic views.

Back to top

Know the enemies of a civil society by their public behaviour, by their fraudulent claim to be liberal-progressive, by their propensity to lie and, above all, by their attachment to authoritarianism.

IP Logged

Gordon

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20738
Gordon
Gender: male

Re: Still MORE Validation for Pauline
Reply #103 - Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:30pm

bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:22pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:15pm:

bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:10pm:

That's the kind of pseudo-slick comeback you almost get away with Karnal.

It is patently clear from the votes that Pauline speaks for a sizeable part of the electorate
Taking account of the limited organisation, I'd say she represents at least the equivalent of the green's support and look at the representation they've had.

One Nation has earned and deserve their voice.

Right you are, Bogie.

And if anyone wants to question her policies, WE DON’T WANT THEM HERE.

Of course anybody can question everybody's viewpoint Karnal.
Just as we can question the morality, justice and fitness of your Islamic views.

Of course you can question Islamic views but if you do you're Islamophobic

Back to top

IBI

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 96446

Re: Still MORE Validation for Pauline
Reply #104 - Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:32pm

bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:22pm:

Karnal wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:15pm:

bogarde73 wrote on Jul 13^th, 2016 at 8:10pm:

That's the kind of pseudo-slick comeback you almost get away with Karnal.

It is patently clear from the votes that Pauline speaks for a sizeable part of the electorate
Taking account of the limited organisation, I'd say she represents at least the equivalent of the green's support and look at the representation they've had.

One Nation has earned and deserve their voice.

Right you are, Bogie.

And if anyone wants to question her policies, WE DON’T WANT THEM HERE.

Of course anybody can question everybody's viewpoint Karnal.
Just as we can question the morality, justice and fitness of your Islamic views.

As you should, Bogie, as you should.

But rest assured, any questioning of Pauline’s ideas is nothing more than racism.

How very very dare they?

Back to top

IP Logged