Australian Politics Forum - Why is only Pauline attacked for electoral funding

Prime Minister for Canyons Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 26906 Canberra Gender:	Re: Why is only Pauline attacked for electoral funding Reply #15 - Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:49am I also forgot to mention that I think the systems a bit wrong as well, in that its based on number of votes you get not how much you actually spend.
Back to top	In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act. No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy) IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139350
Gender: male

Re: Why is only Pauline attacked for electoral funding
Reply #16 - Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:52am

PZ547 wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:47am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:45am:

PZ547 wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:41am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:38am:

Grendel wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:35am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:31am:

matty wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 2:28am:

Strange how this always happens. There are stories going around everywhere about One Nation receiving $1.2 million in electoral funding from this election. Yet not a single story about how much the Coalition, Labor, the Greens or Nick Xenophon have received.

I wonder why that might be...

Because Pauline only does it for the money.

Jesus, were you born yesterday matty?

But unlike Dopeschott and Windsor she isn't running as an independent she is running for the party.
So the money goes to the party.
Even the ABC pointed it out the other day.

Yes.

And then the party gives it to the racist.

Jesus, how thick are you?

Why are you being so ridiculous

I'm being honest.

Hanson runs in these elections for the money, and only the money (well, maybe a little bit of attention too).

The money is then siphoned off into her pocket.

Please tell me you aren't so naive as to think otherwise.

You're wrong

I'm 100% correct.

Why are you defending the redheaded racist?

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139350
Gender: male

Re: Why is only Pauline attacked for electoral funding
Reply #17 - Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:53am

Grendel wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:46am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:38am:

Grendel wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:35am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:31am:

matty wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 2:28am:

Strange how this always happens. There are stories going around everywhere about One Nation receiving $1.2 million in electoral funding from this election. Yet not a single story about how much the Coalition, Labor, the Greens or Nick Xenophon have received.

I wonder why that might be...

Because Pauline only does it for the money.

Jesus, were you born yesterday matty?

But unlike Dopeschott and Windsor she isn't running as an independent she is running for the party.
So the money goes to the party.
Even the ABC pointed it out the other day.

Yes.

And then the party gives it to the racist.

Jesus, how thick are you?

Gee how thick are you that is not how it works...

It's exactly how it works.

Why do you defend the redheaded racist so much?

Are you more racist than Pauline, or about the same?

Back to top

IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35090
Gender: male

Re: Why is only Pauline attacked for electoral funding
Reply #18 - Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:54am

PZ547 wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:41am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:38am:

Grendel wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:35am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:31am:

matty wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 2:28am:

Strange how this always happens. There are stories going around everywhere about One Nation receiving $1.2 million in electoral funding from this election. Yet not a single story about how much the Coalition, Labor, the Greens or Nick Xenophon have received.

I wonder why that might be...

Because Pauline only does it for the money.

Jesus, were you born yesterday matty?

But unlike Dopeschott and Windsor she isn't running as an independent she is running for the party.
So the money goes to the party.
Even the ABC pointed it out the other day.

Yes.

And then the party gives it to the racist.

Jesus, how thick are you?

Why are you being so ridiculous

I"d put it down to lower consciousness and living in a Duuurrrrrr state.
The leftard has nothing much going on in his/her life. No greater purpose or passion.
Thus the ego of the leftard constantly seeks the acknowledgment that "i exist"

In reality, this very low level thinking is almost animal thinking in its origin. a sort of reptilian level of functioning , whereby , every post is designed to get a response and the response provides reassurance that the leftard is "still in existence"

You see this with the attention seeking of low consciousness unionists in protest marches, in the socialist alliance, in the social media fake outrage of a green senator.

the superior rightard, has success in business, success in relationships and success in his contributions to life and so is able to be humble and still very confident of his existance. he does not need to engage in blatant attention seeking

Back to top

IP Logged

Prime Minister for Canyons

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 26906
Canberra
Gender: male

Re: Why is only Pauline attacked for electoral funding
Reply #19 - Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:55am

aquascoot wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:54am:

PZ547 wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:41am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:38am:

Grendel wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:35am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:31am:

matty wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 2:28am:

Strange how this always happens. There are stories going around everywhere about One Nation receiving $1.2 million in electoral funding from this election. Yet not a single story about how much the Coalition, Labor, the Greens or Nick Xenophon have received.

I wonder why that might be...

Because Pauline only does it for the money.

Jesus, were you born yesterday matty?

But unlike Dopeschott and Windsor she isn't running as an independent she is running for the party.
So the money goes to the party.
Even the ABC pointed it out the other day.

Yes.

And then the party gives it to the racist.

Jesus, how thick are you?

Why are you being so ridiculous

I"d put it down to lower consciousness and living in a Duuurrrrrr state.
The leftard has nothing much going on in his/her life. No greater purpose or passion.
Thus the ego of the leftard constantly seeks the acknowledgment that "i exist"

In reality, this very low level thinking is almost animal thinking in its origin. a sort of reptilian level of functioning , whereby , every post is designed to get a response and the response provides reassurance that the leftard is "still in existence"

You see this with the attention seeking of low consciousness unionists in protest marches, in the socialist alliance, in the social media fake outrage of a green senator.

the superior rightard, has success in business, success in relationships and success in his contributions to life and so is able to be humble and still very confident of his existance. he does not need to engage in blatant attention seeking

I agree, and I'd also say Pauline is an alpha male.

Back to top

In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy)

IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35090
Gender: male

Re: Why is only Pauline attacked for electoral funding
Reply #20 - Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:58am

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:55am:

aquascoot wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:54am:

PZ547 wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:41am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:38am:

Grendel wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:35am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:31am:

matty wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 2:28am:

Strange how this always happens. There are stories going around everywhere about One Nation receiving $1.2 million in electoral funding from this election. Yet not a single story about how much the Coalition, Labor, the Greens or Nick Xenophon have received.

I wonder why that might be...

Because Pauline only does it for the money.

Jesus, were you born yesterday matty?

But unlike Dopeschott and Windsor she isn't running as an independent she is running for the party.
So the money goes to the party.
Even the ABC pointed it out the other day.

Yes.

And then the party gives it to the racist.

Jesus, how thick are you?

Why are you being so ridiculous

I"d put it down to lower consciousness and living in a Duuurrrrrr state.
The leftard has nothing much going on in his/her life. No greater purpose or passion.
Thus the ego of the leftard constantly seeks the acknowledgment that "i exist"

In reality, this very low level thinking is almost animal thinking in its origin. a sort of reptilian level of functioning , whereby , every post is designed to get a response and the response provides reassurance that the leftard is "still in existence"

You see this with the attention seeking of low consciousness unionists in protest marches, in the socialist alliance, in the social media fake outrage of a green senator.

the superior rightard, has success in business, success in relationships and success in his contributions to life and so is able to be humble and still very confident of his existance. he does not need to engage in blatant attention seeking

I agree, and I'd also say Pauline is an alpha male.

not really, she is an attention seeker.
she's really no better then the socialist alliance and the green senators.
failures where it really counts and trying to pump their egos by appearing in the New Idea in lingerie...really quite hopeless.
i'd have more respect if she made her fish and chips shop a million dollar enterprise and was humble and calm

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139350
Gender: male

Re: Why is only Pauline attacked for electoral funding
Reply #21 - Jul 11^th, 2016 at 11:00am

aquascoot wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:54am:

PZ547 wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:41am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:38am:

Grendel wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:35am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:31am:

matty wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 2:28am:

Strange how this always happens. There are stories going around everywhere about One Nation receiving $1.2 million in electoral funding from this election. Yet not a single story about how much the Coalition, Labor, the Greens or Nick Xenophon have received.

I wonder why that might be...

Because Pauline only does it for the money.

Jesus, were you born yesterday matty?

But unlike Dopeschott and Windsor she isn't running as an independent she is running for the party.
So the money goes to the party.
Even the ABC pointed it out the other day.

Yes.

And then the party gives it to the racist.

Jesus, how thick are you?

Why are you being so ridiculous

I"d put it down ...

I'm sure you would.

However, I'm just telling the truth.

The redheaded racist does it for the money, and no other reason (apart from attention).

Your gullibility doesn't surprise me in the slightest, but a few others here have surprised me a little.

Back to top

IP Logged

PZ547

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 9282
Gender: male

Re: Why is only Pauline attacked for electoral funding
Reply #22 - Jul 11^th, 2016 at 11:00am

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:53am:

Grendel wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:46am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:38am:

Grendel wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:35am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:31am:

matty wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 2:28am:

Strange how this always happens. There are stories going around everywhere about One Nation receiving $1.2 million in electoral funding from this election. Yet not a single story about how much the Coalition, Labor, the Greens or Nick Xenophon have received.

I wonder why that might be...

Because Pauline only does it for the money.

Jesus, were you born yesterday matty?

But unlike Dopeschott and Windsor she isn't running as an independent she is running for the party.
So the money goes to the party.
Even the ABC pointed it out the other day.

Yes.

And then the party gives it to the racist.

Jesus, how thick are you?

Gee how thick are you that is not how it works...

It's exactly how it works.

Why do you defend the redheaded racist so much?

Are you more racist than Pauline, or about the same?

Does it pay well, this 'I work from home' gig ?

Nip over to the member run boards

You'll find a quote along the lines of

'What does it profit a man to gain the whole world if he forfeits his soul '

Your masters think their old tactics of constant smearing allied with the filth 96%-owned's constant vilification, re: Pauline will give them the old results

Wrong

And the more you and your masters attempt to vilify her, the stronger will be voter determination to support her

As for 'racist' --- that overused and incorrectly applied term --- it's old. Real old

NOW the aussie public has seen Pauline's long-ago warnings confirmed

and the voter knows who's responsible for that confirmation

Your masters are stuck in the past, obviously. Like the filth 96%-owned, dying, reviled media

Different ball game now to going on 20 years ago

Your masters are regarded as traitors

Pauline has been confirmed a visionary and true Australian

Back to top

All my comments, posts & opinions are to be regarded as satire & humour

IP Logged

philperth2010

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20534
Perth
Gender: male

Re: Why is only Pauline attacked for electoral funding
Reply #23 - Jul 11^th, 2016 at 11:02am

matty wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 2:28am:

Strange how this always happens. There are stories going around everywhere about One Nation receiving $1.2 million in electoral funding from this election. Yet not a single story about how much the Coalition, Labor, the Greens or Nick Xenophon have received.

I wonder why that might be...

Perhaps you should read the articles instead of just the headline....In fact the articles do not attack Pauline Hanson as you claim...Why are one Nation supporters so fickle???

http://www.9news.com.au/national/2016/07/10/11/50/pauline-hanson-to-receive-1-2-...

Roll Eyes

Back to top

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)

IP Logged

philperth2010

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20534
Perth
Gender: male

Re: Why is only Pauline attacked for electoral funding
Reply #24 - Jul 11^th, 2016 at 11:03am

PZ547 wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 11:00am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:53am:

Grendel wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:46am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:38am:

Grendel wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:35am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:31am:

matty wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 2:28am:

Strange how this always happens. There are stories going around everywhere about One Nation receiving $1.2 million in electoral funding from this election. Yet not a single story about how much the Coalition, Labor, the Greens or Nick Xenophon have received.

I wonder why that might be...

Because Pauline only does it for the money.

Jesus, were you born yesterday matty?

But unlike Dopeschott and Windsor she isn't running as an independent she is running for the party.
So the money goes to the party.
Even the ABC pointed it out the other day.

Yes.

And then the party gives it to the racist.

Jesus, how thick are you?

Gee how thick are you that is not how it works...

It's exactly how it works.

Why do you defend the redheaded racist so much?

Are you more racist than Pauline, or about the same?

Does it pay well, this 'I work from home' gig ?

Nip over to the member run boards

You'll find a quote along the lines of

'What does it profit a man to gain the whole world if he forfeits his soul '

Your masters think their old tactics of constant smearing allied with the filth 96%-owned's constant vilification, re: Pauline will give them the old results

Wrong

And the more you and your masters attempt to vilify her, the stronger will be voter determination to support her

As for 'racist' --- that overused and incorrectly applied term --- it's old. Real old

NOW the aussie public has seen Pauline's long-ago warnings confirmed

and the voter knows who's responsible for that confirmation

Your masters are stuck in the past, obviously. Like the filth 96%-owned, dying, reviled media

Different ball game now to going on 20 years ago

Your masters are regarded as traitors

Pauline has been confirmed a visionary and true Australian

By whom???

Huh

Back to top

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)

IP Logged

Prime Minister for Canyons

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 26906
Canberra
Gender: male

Re: Why is only Pauline attacked for electoral funding
Reply #25 - Jul 11^th, 2016 at 11:03am

aquascoot wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:58am:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:55am:

aquascoot wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:54am:

PZ547 wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:41am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:38am:

Grendel wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:35am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 10:31am:

matty wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 2:28am:

Strange how this always happens. There are stories going around everywhere about One Nation receiving $1.2 million in electoral funding from this election. Yet not a single story about how much the Coalition, Labor, the Greens or Nick Xenophon have received.

I wonder why that might be...

Because Pauline only does it for the money.

Jesus, were you born yesterday matty?

But unlike Dopeschott and Windsor she isn't running as an independent she is running for the party.
So the money goes to the party.
Even the ABC pointed it out the other day.

Yes.

And then the party gives it to the racist.

Jesus, how thick are you?

Why are you being so ridiculous

I"d put it down to lower consciousness and living in a Duuurrrrrr state.
The leftard has nothing much going on in his/her life. No greater purpose or passion.
Thus the ego of the leftard constantly seeks the acknowledgment that "i exist"

In reality, this very low level thinking is almost animal thinking in its origin. a sort of reptilian level of functioning , whereby , every post is designed to get a response and the response provides reassurance that the leftard is "still in existence"

You see this with the attention seeking of low consciousness unionists in protest marches, in the socialist alliance, in the social media fake outrage of a green senator.

the superior rightard, has success in business, success in relationships and success in his contributions to life and so is able to be humble and still very confident of his existance. he does not need to engage in blatant attention seeking

I agree, and I'd also say Pauline is an alpha male.

not really, she is an attention seeker.
she's really no better then the socialist alliance and the green senators.
failures where it really counts and trying to pump their egos by appearing in the New Idea in lingerie...really quite hopeless.
i'd have more respect if she made her fish and chips shop a million dollar enterprise and was humble and calm

Sorry aquascoot, I was essentially takiong the piss out of your MO to perceive everything in that alpha male BS fashion

Back to top

In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy)

IP Logged

matty Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 11055 East Sydney Gender:	Re: Why is only Pauline attacked for electoral funding Reply #26 - Jul 11^th, 2016 at 11:04am -
Back to top	BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!! IP Logged

Prime Minister for Canyons Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 26906 Canberra Gender:	Re: Why is only Pauline attacked for electoral funding Reply #27 - Jul 11^th, 2016 at 11:04am PZ547 wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 11:00am: Pauline has been confirmed a visionary and true Australian Ahh true australian. As completely meaningless a phrase as real australians or mainstream australia or silent majority
Back to top	In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act. No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy) IP Logged

matty

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male

Re: Why is only Pauline attacked for electoral funding
Reply #28 - Jul 11^th, 2016 at 11:06am

cods wrote on Jul 11^th, 2016 at 7:48am:

I havent seen her singled out matty... show us the link...then I can comment.. the only report on funding I have seen involved all of them...Pauline only gets what she it entitled too like everyone else..

so who has attacked her?.. you have to be fair and show where this is coming from......if its someone on here.. for gawds sakes...grow a pair.

http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/federal-election-2016/pauline-hanson-how-...

Here cods, and this is just one of many over the years where she has been singled out but the media for this.

Back to top

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!

IP Logged

matty Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 11055 East Sydney Gender:	Re: Why is only Pauline attacked for electoral funding Reply #29 - Jul 11^th, 2016 at 11:07am To all of those of you who say that she only does it for the money, where is your evidence?
Back to top	BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!! IP Logged