Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print
Why is only Pauline attacked for electoral funding (Read 6980 times)
PZ547
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9282
Gender: male
Re: Why is only Pauline attacked for electoral funding
Reply #30 - Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:07am
 
.

So you're all on the take, give or take one or two genuine posters

again, same old ....

Must be a sh*t of a life, having to post in out of the way online fora for your next slice of bread

I pity you

But your influence if that's what you're paid to flog, is minimal in the extreme

You'd be buried alive in a real forum

Anyway, suck it up.  People voted for microparties, including One Nation, because they wanted to

Attempting to smear One Nation at this point just makes you Comments-for-Sale mob look like village idiots

Shoveling sh*t would be a noble exercise compared with what you have to do for a living

and all for naught

and your lives pass meaninglessly

then you're too old to change tack

then you're in a home, a nothing, waiting to die

and this -- posting poison for shekels -- is all you will have amounted to

Hope you gain enlightenment soon
Back to top
 

All my comments, posts & opinions are to be regarded as satire & humour
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 139402
Gender: male
Re: Why is only Pauline attacked for electoral funding
Reply #31 - Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:10am
 
PZ547 wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:00am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:53am:
Grendel wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:46am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:38am:
Grendel wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:35am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:31am:
matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 2:28am:
Strange how this always happens. There are stories going around everywhere about One Nation receiving $1.2 million in electoral funding from this election. Yet not a single story about how much the Coalition, Labor, the Greens or Nick Xenophon have received.

I wonder why that might be...


Because Pauline only does it for the money.

Jesus, were you born yesterday matty?


But unlike Dopeschott and Windsor she isn't running as an independent she is running for the party.
So the money goes to the party.
Even the ABC pointed it out the other day.


Yes.

And then the party gives it to the racist.

Jesus, how thick are you?


Gee how thick are you that is not how it works...


It's exactly how it works.

Why do you defend the redheaded racist so much?

Are you more racist than Pauline, or about the same?




Does it pay well, this 'I work from home' gig ?




It pays better than anything else she can get.

McDonald's workers are only on about $20 per hour.

I doubt they'd employ her, though.

Who the bugger would employ her?

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 139402
Gender: male
Re: Why is only Pauline attacked for electoral funding
Reply #32 - Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:13am
 
PZ547 wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:07am:
Anyway, suck it up.  People voted for microparties, including One Nation, because they wanted to


"Ms Hanson speaks for a very small group of people and her views are out of step with the overwhelming majority of Australians. Of the 15 million people who voted ... at least 96 percent did not vote for One Nation. National support for Hansonism is in the low single digits."

The Redheaded Racist

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
John Smith
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 75137
Gender: male
Re: Why is only Pauline attacked for electoral funding
Reply #33 - Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:20am
 
Grendel wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:37am:
John Smith wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:28am:
Grendel wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:23am:
The Party gets the money doofus....  just ask the ABC. Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy



that be the same party that pays her expenses?  Cheesy Cheesy

All parties pay for their candidates campaigns.


Campaign? I said her expenses. 

And yes, they all do it ... but I'm not the one pretending she doesn't profit from it
Back to top
 

Our esteemed leader:
I hope that bitch who was running their brothels for them gets raped with a cactus.
 
IP Logged
 
philperth2010
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20535
Perth
Gender: male
Re: Why is only Pauline attacked for electoral funding
Reply #34 - Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:23am
 
matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:06am:
cods wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 7:48am:
I havent seen her singled out matty... show us the link...then I can comment.. the only report on funding I have seen involved all of them...Pauline only gets what she it entitled too like everyone else..

so who has attacked her?.. you have to be fair and show where this is coming from......if its someone on here.. for gawds sakes...grow a pair.


http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/federal-election-2016/pauline-hanson-how-...

Here cods, and this is just one of many over the years where she has been singled out but the media for this.


Did you read past the headline....Where was Pauline Hanson singled out in the article???

Huh Huh Huh
Back to top
 

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)
 
IP Logged
 
philperth2010
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20535
Perth
Gender: male
Re: Why is only Pauline attacked for electoral funding
Reply #35 - Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:24am
 
PZ547 wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:07am:
.

So you're all on the take, give or take one or two genuine posters

again, same old ....

Must be a sh*t of a life, having to post in out of the way online fora for your next slice of bread

I pity you

But your influence if that's what you're paid to flog, is minimal in the extreme

You'd be buried alive in a real forum

Anyway, suck it up.  People voted for microparties, including One Nation, because they wanted to

Attempting to smear One Nation at this point just makes you Comments-for-Sale mob look like village idiots

Shoveling sh*t would be a noble exercise compared with what you have to do for a living

and all for naught

and your lives pass meaninglessly

then you're too old to change tack

then you're in a home, a nothing, waiting to die

and this -- posting poison for shekels -- is all you will have amounted to

Hope you gain enlightenment soon



What are you talking about???

Huh Huh Huh

Insanity is just what we call stupidity when it doesn't make sense.
Josh Lieb, I am a Genius of Unspeakable Evil and I Want to be Your Class President, 2009
Back to top
 

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)
 
IP Logged
 
matty
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male
Re: Why is only Pauline attacked for electoral funding
Reply #36 - Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:30am
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:13am:
PZ547 wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:07am:
Anyway, suck it up.  People voted for microparties, including One Nation, because they wanted to


"Ms Hanson speaks for a very small group of people and her views are out of step with the overwhelming majority of Australians. Of the 15 million people who voted ... at least 96 percent did not vote for One Nation. National support for Hansonism is in the low single digits."

The Redheaded Racist



Again I ask you; by this logic, do only the major parties speak for many people then? The aGreens came third overall and One Nation fourth, and both received primary votes in the single digits.
Back to top
 

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!
 
IP Logged
 
philperth2010
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20535
Perth
Gender: male
Re: Why is only Pauline attacked for electoral funding
Reply #37 - Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:33am
 
matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:30am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:13am:
PZ547 wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:07am:
Anyway, suck it up.  People voted for microparties, including One Nation, because they wanted to


"Ms Hanson speaks for a very small group of people and her views are out of step with the overwhelming majority of Australians. Of the 15 million people who voted ... at least 96 percent did not vote for One Nation. National support for Hansonism is in the low single digits."

The Redheaded Racist



Again I ask you; by this logic, do only the major parties speak for many people then? The aGreens came third overall and One Nation fourth, and both received primary votes in the single digits.


And just as you reject the Greens as a non entity the same can be said for one nation!!!

Huh Huh Huh
Back to top
 

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)
 
IP Logged
 
aquascoot
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 35106
Gender: male
Re: Why is only Pauline attacked for electoral funding
Reply #38 - Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:37am
 
Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:03am:
aquascoot wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:58am:
Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:55am:
aquascoot wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:54am:
PZ547 wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:41am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:38am:
Grendel wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:35am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 10:31am:
matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 2:28am:
Strange how this always happens. There are stories going around everywhere about One Nation receiving $1.2 million in electoral funding from this election. Yet not a single story about how much the Coalition, Labor, the Greens or Nick Xenophon have received.

I wonder why that might be...


Because Pauline only does it for the money.

Jesus, were you born yesterday matty?


But unlike Dopeschott and Windsor she isn't running as an independent she is running for the party.
So the money goes to the party.
Even the ABC pointed it out the other day.


Yes.

And then the party gives it to the racist.

Jesus, how thick are you?




Why are you being so ridiculous


I"d put it down to lower consciousness and living in a Duuurrrrrr state.
The leftard has nothing much going on in his/her life. No greater purpose or passion.
Thus the ego of the leftard constantly seeks the acknowledgment that "i exist"

In reality, this very low level thinking is almost animal thinking in its origin. a sort of reptilian level of functioning , whereby , every post is designed to get a response and the response provides reassurance that the leftard is "still in existence"

You see this with the attention seeking of low consciousness unionists in protest marches, in the socialist alliance, in the social media fake outrage of a green senator.

the superior rightard, has success in business, success in relationships and success in his contributions to life and so is able to be humble and still very confident of his existance.  he does not need to engage in blatant attention seeking


I agree, and I'd also say Pauline is an alpha male.



not really, she is an attention seeker.
she's really no better then the socialist alliance and the green senators.
failures where it really counts and trying to pump their egos by appearing in the New Idea in lingerie...really quite hopeless.
i'd have more respect if she made her fish and chips shop a million dollar enterprise and was humble and calm



Sorry aquascoot, I was essentially takiong the piss out of your MO to perceive everything in that alpha male BS fashion



No need to apologise Bojack.

people are either in action or reaction.
the alpha is always at the action.
He is active.
the beta is always at the reaction
He reacts to the alpha's "energy".

When you put out an idea, as an alpha male, you just own it and you do it for your own self amusement.

the beta males and females on a forum are easy to pick and most are lefties...greg, mothra, John Smith,

they rarely post anything that is "at the action", they just waft about 'reacting " to other people.
this type of behaviour comes from a lower place (it comes from the amygdyloid part of the brain) reflexes like an animal has.
the alpha is putting out ideas that come from the pre frontal cortex (the thinking part of the brain).

I would love to do a PET scan on greg. i think his prefrontal cortex would hardly show up and his amygdyla would light up like the sun. Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 139402
Gender: male
Re: Why is only Pauline attacked for electoral funding
Reply #39 - Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:38am
 
matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:30am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:13am:
PZ547 wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:07am:
Anyway, suck it up.  People voted for microparties, including One Nation, because they wanted to


"Ms Hanson speaks for a very small group of people and her views are out of step with the overwhelming majority of Australians. Of the 15 million people who voted ... at least 96 percent did not vote for One Nation. National support for Hansonism is in the low single digits."

The Redheaded Racist



Again I ask you; by this logic ...


"logic"?

It's a statement of fact:

"Ms Hanson speaks for a very small group of people and her views are out of step with the overwhelming majority of Australians. Of the 15 million people who voted ... at least 96 percent did not vote for One Nation. National support for Hansonism is in the low single digits."
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Grendel
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 28080
Gender: male
Re: Why is only Pauline attacked for electoral funding
Reply #40 - Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:46am
 
philperth2010 wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:02am:
matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 2:28am:
Strange how this always happens. There are stories going around everywhere about One Nation receiving $1.2 million in electoral funding from this election. Yet not a single story about how much the Coalition, Labor, the Greens or Nick Xenophon have received.

I wonder why that might be...


Perhaps you should read the articles instead of just the headline....In fact the articles do not attack Pauline Hanson as you claim...Why are one Nation supporters so fickle???

http://www.9news.com.au/national/2016/07/10/11/50/pauline-hanson-to-receive-1-2-...

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Well apart from you needing to talk to numbskulls like John and peccer, you have to ask why she was singled out in the HEADLINE....

Pauline is a very genuine person and no one should doubt her claims to be doing what she is doing for her country, because believe me...  she is.
She may not be as articulate as some, as knowledgeable as some, as well funded and supported as some, but she is genuine in what she believes.  She is not a racist, she just loves her country...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
matty
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male
Re: Why is only Pauline attacked for electoral funding
Reply #41 - Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:53am
 
philperth2010 wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:23am:
matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:06am:
cods wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 7:48am:
I havent seen her singled out matty... show us the link...then I can comment.. the only report on funding I have seen involved all of them...Pauline only gets what she it entitled too like everyone else..

so who has attacked her?.. you have to be fair and show where this is coming from......if its someone on here.. for gawds sakes...grow a pair.


http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/federal-election-2016/pauline-hanson-how-...

Here cods, and this is just one of many over the years where she has been singled out but the media for this.


Did you read past the headline....Where was Pauline Hanson singled out in the article???

Huh Huh Huh


Because nobody ever goes on about how much everyone else gets in electoral funding, just what she does.
Back to top
 

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 139402
Gender: male
Re: Why is only Pauline attacked for electoral funding
Reply #42 - Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:54am
 
matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:53am:
philperth2010 wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:23am:
matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:06am:
cods wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 7:48am:
I havent seen her singled out matty... show us the link...then I can comment.. the only report on funding I have seen involved all of them...Pauline only gets what she it entitled too like everyone else..

so who has attacked her?.. you have to be fair and show where this is coming from......if its someone on here.. for gawds sakes...grow a pair.


http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/federal-election-2016/pauline-hanson-how-...

Here cods, and this is just one of many over the years where she has been singled out but the media for this.


Did you read past the headline....Where was Pauline Hanson singled out in the article???

Huh Huh Huh


Becsuse nobody ever goes on about how much everyone else gets in electoral funding, just what she does.


That's because she does it purely for the funding.

She's an election whore.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
matty
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male
Re: Why is only Pauline attacked for electoral funding
Reply #43 - Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:54am
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:38am:
matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:30am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:13am:
PZ547 wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:07am:
Anyway, suck it up.  People voted for microparties, including One Nation, because they wanted to


"Ms Hanson speaks for a very small group of people and her views are out of step with the overwhelming majority of Australians. Of the 15 million people who voted ... at least 96 percent did not vote for One Nation. National support for Hansonism is in the low single digits."

The Redheaded Racist



Again I ask you; by this logic ...


"logic"?

It's a statement of fact:

"Ms Hanson speaks for a very small group of people and her views are out of step with the overwhelming majority of Australians. Of the 15 million people who voted ... at least 96 percent did not vote for One Nation. National support for Hansonism is in the low single digits."


So is it then too a fact that every other party apart from the two majors speak for a very small group of people?
Back to top
 

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!
 
IP Logged
 
matty
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 11055
East Sydney
Gender: male
Re: Why is only Pauline attacked for electoral funding
Reply #44 - Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:55am
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:54am:
matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:53am:
philperth2010 wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:23am:
matty wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 11:06am:
cods wrote on Jul 11th, 2016 at 7:48am:
I havent seen her singled out matty... show us the link...then I can comment.. the only report on funding I have seen involved all of them...Pauline only gets what she it entitled too like everyone else..

so who has attacked her?.. you have to be fair and show where this is coming from......if its someone on here.. for gawds sakes...grow a pair.


http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/federal-election-2016/pauline-hanson-how-...

Here cods, and this is just one of many over the years where she has been singled out but the media for this.


Did you read past the headline....Where was Pauline Hanson singled out in the article???

Huh Huh Huh


Becsuse nobody ever goes on about how much everyone else gets in electoral funding, just what she does.


That's because she does it purely for the funding.

She's an election whore.



Evidence?
Back to top
 

BILL SHORTEN WILL NEVER BE PM!!!!
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 
Send Topic Print