Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
Rush to Wind a bad move. (Read 2094 times)
juliar
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 22966
Re: Rush to Wind a bad move.
Reply #15 - Jul 17th, 2016 at 2:26pm
 
The IMF is part of the United Nations which is unbelievably corrupt.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
red baron
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 10204
Blue Mountains
Gender: male
Re: Rush to Wind a bad move.
Reply #16 - Jul 17th, 2016 at 2:28pm
 
Yes Juliar we have détente....The United Nations is the most corrupt organisation in the world!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
philperth2010
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20508
Perth
Gender: male
Re: Rush to Wind a bad move.
Reply #17 - Jul 17th, 2016 at 2:35pm
 
red baron wrote on Jul 17th, 2016 at 2:28pm:
Yes Juliar we have détente....The United Nations is the most corrupt organisation in the world!


Is that because Julie Bishop got a seat on the security council???

http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/julie-bishop-then-and-now-...

Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.
Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 42243
Re: Rush to Wind a bad move.
Reply #18 - Jul 17th, 2016 at 7:03pm
 
Grendel wrote on Jul 17th, 2016 at 11:20am:
Brian Ross wrote on Jul 16th, 2016 at 11:50pm:
The Australian is a completely committed backer of fossil fuels.   For Wind to be considered untrustworthy, is to ignore the several thousands years we have used it...    Roll Eyes

Really bwian imagine you shooting the messenger and ignoring the facts...
Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin


I am pointing out the dangers of believe a single source which is tainted, Grendel.   The "facts" you accuse me of ignoring are only inconvenient if we ignore the facts about Fossil fuel usage.   Are you prepared to do that?    Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 42243
Re: Rush to Wind a bad move.
Reply #19 - Jul 17th, 2016 at 7:05pm
 
juliar wrote on Jul 17th, 2016 at 2:26pm:
The IMF is part of the United Nations which is unbelievably corrupt.


The IMF is not a part of the UN and I am unsure where you got the belief otherwise.  It is controlled by it's own member nations, not the UN.    Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 17962
Gender: male
Re: Rush to Wind a bad move.
Reply #20 - Jul 17th, 2016 at 7:28pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Jul 17th, 2016 at 7:05pm:
juliar wrote on Jul 17th, 2016 at 2:26pm:
The IMF is part of the United Nations which is unbelievably corrupt.


The IMF is not a part of the UN and I am unsure where you got the belief otherwise.  It is controlled by it's own member nations, not the UN.    Roll Eyes



Wrong. 'Unlike the General Assembly of the United Nations, where each country has one vote, decision making at the IMF was designed to reflect the relative positions of its member countries in the global economy.'

http://www.imf.org/external/about.htm

It is controlled by the larger members.

'The International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank are institutions in the United Nations system.'

http://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/facts/imfwb.htm
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jul 17th, 2016 at 7:45pm by lee »  
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 17962
Gender: male
Re: Rush to Wind a bad move.
Reply #21 - Jul 17th, 2016 at 7:40pm
 
'Tax subsidies exist if taxes for energy are below their efficient level. This has two components. First, energy should be taxed the same way as any other consumer product . If energy taxes are lower than this, there is a tax subsidy. Second, some energy products contribute to pollution and global warming— efficient taxation requires that the price of  energy should reflect these adverse effects on society. In most countries, taxes on energy fall far short of this, implying the full costs of consuming energy are not reflected in its price, as it should when energy is priced right'

https://www.imf.org/external/np/fad/subsidies/pdf/note.pdf

They do noyt include any beneficial effects.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 40764
Gender: male
Re: Rush to Wind a bad move.
Reply #22 - Jul 17th, 2016 at 7:40pm
 
juliar wrote on Jul 17th, 2016 at 2:05pm:
Greenies in denial again.

SA and Tassie are testament to the Greenies sabotaging stupidity.

Today the Greenies are an endangered species headed towards extinction.

Their ONLY supporters are the inner city queers and drug addicts.

Once during Bob Brown's days the Greenies stood for trees and endangered cane toads and rabbits and things.

Today the Greenies are just puppets of the United Nations trying to push the UN One World Govt and Agenda 21 rubbish.

The carbon dioxide rubbish is now well proven to be just a GIGANTIC HOAX designed to fraudulently get money for the UN.

Windy turbines are an expensive high maintenance bird killing monstrosity which is inefficient and unreliable and CANNOT support heavy industry which requires reliable 24/7 power. And who pays to replace them when they wear out in about 20 years ?

Now you all know why the Greenies keep trying to close down all the heavy industry in Australia.

How will SA build the subs without reliable electric power ? The slimy Greenies want SA to lose the sub building contract and they want to close the steel manufacturing in Whyalla.

The Greenies are just obtuse vermin that needs to be exterminated real soon.


you do have a lovely turn of phrase
Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
juliar
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 22966
Re: Rush to Wind a bad move.
Reply #23 - Jul 17th, 2016 at 8:44pm
 
Now back to Greenie ravaged and plundered Sth Aust which is slowly discovering that the toy Greenie windymills are pretty useless, you know a bit like the Greenies.


South Australia – Wind Powered Train Wreck: Power Supply Chaos Strands Thousands of Commuters
May 8, 2016 by stopthesethings 9 Comments

South Australia’s wind powered economy is a picture of reliability (see above and below)
.
In its capital, Adelaide, for 2 days in row (28 and 29 April) thousands of hopeful commuters were left to their own devices, as wild variations in wind power output wrecked the power supply to its Seaford/Tonsley electric train line.

We’ll hand over briefly to what passes for journalism in SA to get (as usual) half of the story.
Free ride to pay for train line closure Tim Williams Sunday Mail 1 May 2016

TRAIN passengers who use the lines affected by the electric rail shutdown on Thursday and Friday will ride for free one day this week as compensation.
A fault with a circuit breaker on the Seaford line produced a power outage that caused chaos for commuters on the Seaford and Tonsley lines, with knock-on effects on the Grange line, forcing many to rely on substitute buses or old diesel trains.
Transport Minister Stephen Mullighan yesterday repeated his thanks to commuters for their patience.
“We not only provided some free services (on Friday), substitute services, but we are intending to have a free travel day for those affected lines coming in the week,” he said.
Mr Mullighan said teams of engineers from his department and contractor Siemens were reviewing the “highly unusual” power outage at the Lonsdale substation, where both primary and secondary power feeds failed. An independent investigator will also be appointed.
Mr Mullighan said it was normally possible to switch “seamlessly” between the two power feeds, as had been done four times in the past year.
“Yes, a circuit-breaker did fail but that’s what they are designed to do. It’s highly unusual that separate power feeds coming in from separate parts of the SA Power Networks electricity network were unavailable at the same time.”Mr Mullighan said taxpayers would not have to foot the bill for repairs. Siemens would be asked to fix the substation and prevent future outages.
Sunday Mail
So just how “highly unusual” was the power outage suffered? And what caused it?
South Australia is referred to as Australia’s ‘Wind Power Capital’. Its 1,477MW of wind power capacity is said to equate to around 40% of total generating capacity (a figure soon to increase if Alinta’s Port Augusta Power Plants close, as threatened).
With its attempt to rely on the weather for power, SA has witnessed Statewide blackouts – when wind power output collapses on a total, and totally unpredictable basis: Wind Industry’s Armageddon: Wind Farm Output Collapse Leaves 110,000 South Australian Homes & Businesses Powerless
And short of complete collapses, SA’s grid has become increasingly unstable, with massive and wild fluctuations in wind power output wrecking the security of supply (not to mention the small matter of rocketing power prices).
South Australians are learning to live with daily ‘load-shedding’, that – as we reported previously – even its premier academic institutions have to suffer, along with thousands of other businesses and households. This telling little email from UniSA’s management was flicked to us by one of our SA operatives (who just happens to be an engineer):
email ML
The source of the “failure to the incoming electricity supply” was, as our engineer contact informs us, all about ‘grid instability’, caused by SA’s chaotic, intermittent and unreliable wind power supply.
Our contact also tells us that UniSA’s Mawson Lakes campus (located north of Adelaide and south of Salisbury) had been experiencing frequent supply ‘interruptions’ and wholesale blackouts for months prior to the email notice above. Air-conditioners no longer functioned; lectures were cancelled; the campus would go into “lock-down”; and the power surges and erratic supply damaged electrical equipment and appliances, as well as distribution systems on campus.
The cost of repairing or replacing appliances, equipment or electrical systems – due to erratic wind power supplies (and the power surges, grid instability and consequent grid management chaos that comes with intermittent wind power) – is just another cost that gets brushed aside by one-eyed wind-worshippers.
So too the cost of having thousands of commuters stranded: a result due to the entirely erratic output from wind power, which has turned an otherwise stable supply – essential to run electric trains (and everything else we rely on, for that matter) – totally feral (as we detail below).

Read more in the LINK
https://stopthesethings.com/2016/05/08/south-australia-wind-powered-train-wreck-...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
juliar
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 22966
Re: Rush to Wind a bad move.
Reply #24 - Jul 17th, 2016 at 9:10pm
 
How the Greenie vandals sabotage Australian industry.



South Australia’s Wind Power Nightmare Crushing its Biggest Employers
July 17, 2016 by stopthesethings 1 Comment

For over 3½ years, STT has been warning about the pending social and economic disaster in Australia’s so-called “wind power capital”, South Australia.
A few weeks back we covered yet another crippling 12% hike in retail power prices, to be suffered by cash-strapped South Australian households; those who, of course, aren’t among the tens of thousands that have already been cut from the grid, unable to pay their escalating bills.


In the meantime, South Australia’s largest employers – energy hungry outfits like Nyrstar’s lead and zinc smelter at Port Pirie; Arrium’s steelworks at Whyalla; BHP Billiton’s giant Olympic Dam copper and uranium mine; and Adelaide Brighton Cement at Port Adelaide – are being belted by spot prices starting at over $1,000 per MWh and which frequently hit the market price cap of $13,800 per MWh.  Those figures compare with prices received by scheduled, base-load generators of between $45-70 per MWh.

South Australia’s chaotic electricity supply and pricing disaster – from which there is no escape – is the direct product of the Federal Government’s Large-Scale Renewable Energy Target – designed as a $45 billion tax on all Australian electricity consumers, returned as a subsidy in the form of Renewable Energy Certificates (or LGCs) to wind power outfits (see our post here).

The LRET has two key effects on SA’s power market (and will have the same effect in any of the other States that are stupid enough to follow its lead).

First, is the fixed and guaranteed price paid to wind power outfits when the wind is blowing – at around $110 per MW, almost three times the rates charged by conventional base-load generators.
Second, is the rampant price gouging that takes place when wind power output collapses on a total and totally unpredictable basis.  See our complete analysis here: South Australians Locked in Wind Power Price Disaster: Retail Prices Jump Another 12%

If any State or Country wants an insight into what a wind powered future looks like, then look no further than South Australia.
Over the next few posts we will focus on the greatest energy debacle ever seen in Australian history.  The mainstream media have finally caught up with the scale and scope of the disaster in SA: Adelaide’s The Advertiser and national broadsheet, The Australian have been running a series of front-page articles detailing the quagmire in which SA now wallows (we’ll pick up on those stories shortly).

But first, we’ll turn to the Australian Financial Review’s, Ben Potter who has been on the scent for months now.
Arrium hit by solar, wind energy prices
Australian Financial Review Ben Potter 29 June 2016
Rising energy prices fuelled by South Australia’s ambitious renewable energy target have helped send stricken Whyalla steelmaker Arrium cap in hand to governments seeking $150 million-plus in taxpayer aid.

Higher energy prices may have added as much as $12 million to Arrium’s annual costs, with rising gas prices and South Australia’s wind and solar power among the main culprits.

South Australia’s Labor government has pledged $50 million, federal Labor leader Bill Shorten has offered $100 million if he wins and Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull has countered with a $49 million loan.

Arrium’s former board blamed its problems on global overcapacity in steelmaking – which has sparked a trade war. The company called in administrators in April after it failed to refinance its $2.8 billion debts.

But surging energy prices, fuelled by South Australia’s 40 per cent share of renewables, have also had a role.

On Tuesday, Mr Shorten declined to guarantee that federal Labor’s target for 50 per cent renewables in 2030 would not send the rest of Australia down the path followed by South Australia, which has the highest and most variable energy prices in the national electricity grid.
Mr Shorten also declined to say whether Labor would formally expand the Renewable Energy Target in order to increase renewables to 50 per cent of the energy mix.
“When you look at how else we can improve renewable energy as a mix, we do it by creating investment certainty,” he told reporters in Canberra.


Arrium’s administrator Mark Mentha said the steelmaker paid an average $71 a megawatt hour for electricity on the spot market in South Australia last year, spending $29 million on electricity for iron mining and steelmaking at Whyalla, South Middleback Ranges and Iron Knob.

That’s about $8 million more than the same amount of electricity would cost in Victoria and NSW, or would have cost a couple of years ago in South Australia. As well, the price Arrium pays for natural gas at Whyalla has surged from just under $5 a gigajoule to just under $6 a gigajoule, lifting its annual gas bill to about $24 million from about $20 million.


To read the rest go to the LINK
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
juliar
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 22966
Re: Rush to Wind a bad move.
Reply #25 - Jul 17th, 2016 at 9:25pm
 
How the Greenie hoodlums starve industry of affordable power.

...
So, this is what a wind powered ‘future’ looks like …


South Australians Locked in Wind Power Price Disaster: Retail Prices Jump Another 12%
June 20, 2016 by stopthesethings 4 Comments

SA’s Treasurer, Tom Koutsantonis: plays deaf to economic reality.

South Australia is an economic basket case, thanks, in no small part, to its obsession with wind power.

Power prices are spiralling out of control. Back in March SA’s businesses were belted with a 90% hike in their bills, that left manufacturers, miners and other power hungry businesses reeling: Wind Power Costs Crushing South Australian Businesses: Firms Hit with 90% Price Hike

Now residential customers have just been whacked by AGL, with a 12% power price hike (with a whole lot worse to come).  What passes for journalism in SA pitched up the following half-baked ‘analysis’ on the causes of what portends to be a social and economic disaster (STT fills in the gaps a little later).

State’s largest energy retailer, AGL, set to hike electricity bill prices
The AdvertiserDavid Nankervis 15 June 2016

AGL customers will be hit by a big price hike.
THE state’s largest energy retailer, AGL, will slug its customers with an average annual hike of $228 on their electricity bill.
The 12 per cent price hike applies from next month and will have a massive impact as around half the state’s householders are AGL electricity customers.
The price hike has prompted urgent calls from welfare groups for householders to shop around for cheaper deals and save hundreds of dollars a year.
SA Council of Social Services executive director Ross Womersley said he was surprised at the price hike and didn’t understand the rationale behind it.
“No doubt this decision comes at an extraordinary time with householders having just seen savings in network charges of around $140 a year,” Mr Womersley said.
State Treasurer Tom Koutsantonis, himself an AGL customer, also urged customers to shop around. He said the price rise was unjustified and “a dramatic increase for South Australian families”.
In a statement issued this morning, AGL said the price rise was “mainly driven by the cost and availability of coal and gas supply for electricity generation as well as the changing mix of generation output”.
It added that the closure of the coal fired Port Augusta power stations “has contributed to the price changes”.

Opposition energy spokesman Dan van Holst Pellekaan blamed the Government’s promotion of renewable energy for the price rise.
“Labor’s flawed electricity policy led to the closure of the Port Augusta Power Station and now the Weatherill Government is proposing to spend hundreds of millions of taxpayers dollars upgrading an interconnector so it can import coal-generated electricity from Victoria,” he said.
AGL said the average weekly electricity bill increase would be $4.40 per week but this would vary “substantially depending on a customer’s tariff type, their usage, and their existing energy plan”.
The company also warned that new fees for over-the-counter payments and the issuing of paper bills would apply from October 2016.

The Advertiser power-bill
Treasurer Tom Koutsantonis says it’s time to shop around, so let’s see what’s on offer with the other retailers … well, let’s go shopping …
AGL and Origin both set to hike electricity bill prices
The Advertiser David Nankervis 15 June 2016
Ouch! State’s largest power retailer to increase prices
ENERGY retailer Origin will increase electricity bills by 6.5 per cent or $117 a year.
The decision comes on top of AGL’s announcement on Wednesday of a 12 per cent — or $228 a year — increase for electricity as welfare agencies warned more retailers were likely to hike their prices.
Energy Australia refused to rule out price rises when contacted by The Advertiser.
But AGL gas customers will receive good news on Thursday when the retailer announces an average $100-a-year cut to gas bills.
The price rises from the state’s two biggest energy retailers take effect from next month.
St Vincent de Paul researcher Gavin Dufty said “all the retailers will change their prices”.
“You can guarantee the other companies will follow like pigs to a trough,” he said.
Uniting Communities spokesman Mark Henley said he “had no doubt the other retailers will be increasing their prices”.
The price hikes have prompted urgent calls from welfare groups for householders to shop around for cheaper deals to save hundreds of dollars a year.
SA Council of Social Services executive director Ross Womersley said he was surprised at the price hike and “didn’t understand the rationale” behind the increases.
“No doubt these decisions come at an extraordinary time with householders having just seen savings in network charges of around $140 a year,” Mr Womersley said.
Treasurer Tom Koutsantonis, himself an AGL customer, also urged customers to shop around and potentially save hundreds of dollars on their electricity bills.

Read the rest in the LINK
https://stopthesethings.com/2016/06/20/south-australians-locked-in-wind-power-pr...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 42243
Re: Rush to Wind a bad move.
Reply #26 - Jul 17th, 2016 at 9:34pm
 
lee wrote on Jul 17th, 2016 at 7:28pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Jul 17th, 2016 at 7:05pm:
juliar wrote on Jul 17th, 2016 at 2:26pm:
The IMF is part of the United Nations which is unbelievably corrupt.


The IMF is not a part of the UN and I am unsure where you got the belief otherwise.  It is controlled by it's own member nations, not the UN.    Roll Eyes



Wrong. 'Unlike the General Assembly of the United Nations, where each country has one vote, decision making at the IMF was designed to reflect the relative positions of its member countries in the global economy.'

http://www.imf.org/external/about.htm

It is controlled by the larger members.

'The International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank are institutions in the United Nations system.'

http://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/facts/imfwb.htm


They are not part of the United Nations Organisation nor are they held responsible by the UN.   
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
juliar
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 22966
Re: Rush to Wind a bad move.
Reply #27 - Jul 17th, 2016 at 9:44pm
 
Only coal can save Sth Aust from the Greenie vandals and hoodlums.




South Australia’s Wind Power Chaos: Victoria’s Coal-Fired Plant its Only Salvation
June 5, 2016 by stopthesethings 6 Comments

Wind cultists have been making the brazen claim that the rampant proliferation of these things in South Australia led to the demise of Alinta’s coal-fired plant at Port Augusta.

The perverse economics of the LRET (and the market distortions of directing RECs – currently worth $80 – to a ‘product’ with NO commercial value) is the culprit, not electricity supplied at crazy random intervals, which, in SA, wind power operators actually pay the grid manager up to $20 per MWh to take, on those occasions when the wind hits its straps for a few hours at a stretch (see our post here).

Without subsidies, conventional generators can’t possibly give power away to ‘compete’ on those terms; not if they want to remain solvent, that is.

The wind cult is also pedalling the myth that, with the closure of Port Augusta, CO2 emissions will plummet and, ergo, we will all be saved from imminent global incineration. As with most mantras, it’s more about the faithful’s beliefs, rather than unassailable facts and their inevitable consequences.

As STT has pointed out, just once or twice, if CO2 gas is the existential threat we’re led to believe, then wind power is as sensible as throwing petrol on a raging fire.

In this In Daily piece, Mike Sandiford (Professor of Geology at the University of Melbourne) points out that, from hereon, South Australians will be importing (via interconnectors) the dispatchable supply, once provided from the coal-fired plant at Port Augusta, from another dispatchable supply; namely coal-fired plant located in Victoria’s Latrobe Valley.

Despite the anti-fossil fuel squad’s momentary cheering, the fact is that, from now on, South Australians will largely be powered by Victorian coal: except, of course, on those – increasingly likely – occasions when wind power output totally collapses (on a totally unpredictable basis – see above), the interconnectors hit their thermal limits, overload and fail – leaving them lit by candles (see our post here).

In the result, rather than CO2 emissions falling, they’re just as likely to rise.

Why Port Augusta shutdown won’t reduce carbon emissions
In Daily Mike Sandiford 12 May 2016

At 9.40 am local time on Monday May 9th the turbines at Alinta’s 520 megawatt Northern Power Station at Port Augusta disconnected from the grid for the last time.
And with it ended more than 50 years of coal-fired power generation in South Australia.

But Northern’s shutdown does not mean that South Australian power supply is coal-free, and it is unlikely to mean that its power consumption is less carbon-intensive, at least in the short term.

[South Australian power dispatch as a percentage of total coloured by fuel type for the period ~ 5:00 am May 9 through to 10 am Monday 10th. Data sourced from AEMO. Units in megawatts. Time is in NEM-time corresponding Australian Eastern Standard time. The vertical dashed line marks the shutting off of the Northern Power station, and the last coal dispatch within South Australia.]
Not long after Northern shutdown, other lights went out across South Australia as storms left a trail of destruction across the network – the weather gods seemingly whipped into a frenzy of excitement.
By early the following morning a new benchmark had been set with wind-power touching 90% of the dispatch onto the South Australian grid.

[South Australian power dispatch as a percentage of total coloured by fuel type for the period ~ 5:00 am May 9 through to 10 am Monday 10th. Data sourced from AEMO.]
The electricity market followed suit, with spot prices rising to $400 per megawatt hour as Northern’s last turbine was shut down, to $480 shortly after, before descending as low as -$34 the following morning.

[5-minute spot prices for the period ~ 5:00 am May 9th through to 10 am May 10th, coloured by NEM region. Units are dollars per megawatt hour. Data sourced from AEMO.]
With power flows across the nation responding to the changing circumstances in South Australia, connected markets followed the merry dance. Across the mainland states, wholesale prices averaged a bit over $90 per megawatt hour across the 29 hour period shown here, about double what we would expect for a typical Autumn weekday. Natural gas did particularly well, returning an average of more than $100 in each of the mainland jurisdictions.

[Volume-weighted wholesale power prices for the period ~ 5:00 am May 9 through to 10 am Monday 10th, by region and by fuel type. Units are dollars per megawatt hour. Data sourced from AEMO.]

To read rest go to the LINK
https://stopthesethings.com/2016/06/05/south-australias-wind-power-chaos-victori...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
juliar
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 22966
Re: Rush to Wind a bad move.
Reply #28 - Jul 17th, 2016 at 9:57pm
 
Sth Aust is the soggy slops that is the result of cooking up the Greenies' recipe.




South Australia: Proving Wind Power a Recipe for Social & Economic Disaster
May 29, 2016 by stopthesethings 4 Comments

The image above is taken from the Collins Picture Dictionary under the definition of ‘chaos‘: complete confusion and disorder : a state in which behavior and events are not controlled by anything.
To be fair, South Australia’s power supply is ‘controlled’ ……  ‘controlled’ by the vagaries of the weather, that is.

Renewables alone a recipe for blackouts
Australian Financial Review Ben Potter 17 May 2016

Australia faces potential blackouts and poor jobs and environmental outcomes if it relies solely on the Renewable Energy Target, a new report says.
South Australia’s energy security problems show the risks for the nation of promoting wind and solar energy in a surplus electricity market without a firm plan for an orderly phase-out of coal-fired stations, it says.

The report is a challenge to federal Labor, which has an aggressive 50 per cent Renewable Energy Target (RET) for 2030 with an undefined carbon price policy, but also the Turnbull government, which is sitting pat on the current RET of about 25 per cent by 2020.

“South Australia is at the forefront of an [unplanned] energy transition”, the report by Tim King, energy policy director at the anti-fossil fuel Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, says.

Wind and rooftop solar energy will make up about 48 per cent of the state’s electricity generation after this month’s closure of Alinta’s Northern coal power station, well on the way to Labor’s 50 per cent target, it says.

But the rapid growth of renewable energy has triggered abrupt and “surprising” early closures such as Northern, and the state could now be mainly dependent on wind and solar energy for substantial periods of the year.
“In the absence of any meaningful battery storage, the key risk in these developments is energy security,” the report says. Mr King is a former Deutsche Bank Australasia managing director and head of company research.
If replicated nationally, Australia’s National Electricity Market faces “a disorderly transition resulting in the potential for blackouts and poor social and environmental outcomes”, says the report.

Sub-Critical Australia: Risks from Market Imbalance in the Australian National Electricity Market calls for an orderly phase-out of coal power stations “that allows stakeholders to prepare for the inevitable transition to a cleaner electricity system”.
Over-reliance on the RET will have the result of low cost but heavily carbon-intensive brown coal power stations staying in business while less polluting but more costly black coal plant is retired, the report says.

The Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO) said last year supply in South Australia should remain reliable as long as the Heywood high-voltage interconnector to Victoria’s brown coal power stations is running, but a statewide outage is possible in a “low probability” worst-case scenario of Heywood failing and no other baseload power being available.

The Weatherill state government has been working on a policy to alleviate the security and stability issues created by its heavy dependence on wind and solar since December.
But time is running out for Nyrstar, the Belgian metals group which is due to recommission the Port Pirie smelter midyear after spending $500 million to refurbish it, part-guaranteed from the SA government. SA futures prices for 2017 and 2018 are $82-89 a megawatt hour, about twice Victorian and NSW levels.

The IEEFA report is the second in a month from clean-energy advocates to acknowledge that increasing the RET on its own, without broader policies to hasten the closure of coal power stations and manage the shocks to the electricity market and regional employment, is a recipe for instability.

The Climate Institute said in a report last month that the SA government and AEMO had been too slow to respond to “changes on the ground” ahead of policy responses.
The institute said even with a carbon price renewables would continue to require subsidies of as much as $2.7 billion a year, and total costs of moving to a zero-carbon economy could be as high as $276 billion over 30 years.

Australian Financial Review
Jay Weatherill has a ‘plan’. General Custer had a ‘plan’, too…

Nice effort, Ben! He is probably the only AFR reporter with something like a clue about power generation and markets, but his sub-editor did him a disservice with the headline ‘Renewables alone a recipe for blackouts’, which would have been on the money had it simply read ‘Renewables a recipe for blackouts’.

Read rest in LINK
https://stopthesethings.com/2016/05/29/south-australia-proving-wind-power-a-reci...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
juliar
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 22966
Re: Rush to Wind a bad move.
Reply #29 - Jul 17th, 2016 at 10:02pm
 
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank are institutions in the United Nations system.


They share the same goal of raising living standards in their member countries.

Their approaches to this goal are complementary, with the IMF focusing on macroeconomic issues and the World Bank concentrating on long-term economic development and poverty reduction.

http://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/facts/imfwb.htm




List of specialized agencies of the United Nations
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Specialized agencies are autonomous organizations working with the United Nations and each other through the coordinating machinery of the United Nations Economic and Social Council at the intergovernmental level, and through the Chief Executives Board for coordination (CEB) at the inter-secretariat level.

Specialized agencies may or may not have been originally created by the United Nations, but they are incorporated into the United Nations System by the United Nations Economic and Social Council acting under Articles 57 and 63 of the United Nations Charter.

At present the UN has in total specialized agencies that carry out various functions on behalf of the UN.

The specialized agencies are listed below.

Contents
1      Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO)
2      International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)
3      International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD)
4      International Labour Organization (ILO)
5      International Maritime Organization (IMO)
6      International Monetary Fund (IMF)
7      International Telecommunication Union (ITU)
8      United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)
9      United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO)
10      Universal Postal Union (UPU)
11      World Bank Group (WBG)
11.1      International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD)
11.2      International Finance Corporation (IFC)
11.3      International Development Association (IDA)
12      World Health Organization (WHO)
13      World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)
14      World Meteorological Organization (WMO)
15      World Tourism Organization (UNWTO)
16      Former specialized agencies
17      Related organizations
17.1      Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization Preparatory Commission
17.2      International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
17.3      Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons
17.4      World Trade Organization (WTO)
18      Summary
19      See also
20      References
21      External links

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_specialized_agencies_of_the_United_Nations

Back to top
« Last Edit: Jul 18th, 2016 at 4:55pm by juliar »  
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print