Australian Politics Forum - Nauru disgrace.

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: Nauru disgrace.
Reply #135 - Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:19pm

Gordon wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:13pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:11pm:

Gordon wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:06pm:

Left or right?

What nationality and religion Gordon??

Paki Muz. He burnt his shop down for the insurance money and killed three people, including a baby.

Oh that maggot. He'd be going in a gas chamber if I had my way.

Back to top

IP Logged

Mr Hammer Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 25212 Gender:	Re: Nauru disgrace. Reply #136 - Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:21pm
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139844
Gender: male

Re: Nauru disgrace.
Reply #137 - Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:22pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:17pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:11pm:

Valkie wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:08pm:

Quote:

Incorrect.

You are attempting to enter Australia as an asylum seeker.

And, it's not illegal to do that.

So, if someone walked into your house and said I'm an asylum seeker,
You had no information of this person, who he was, where he was from and if he was a murderer, criminal, or rapist,
You would say.........."welcome"

I would send him or her to the Immigration Department for processing.

If he or she was then granted refugee status, I'd say "welcome".

If they weren't, I'd say "get out of here".

Where's the problem?

What about if they aren't considered a refugee but their home country (like Iran) won't take them back??

I would tell the Government to get off their arse and do their job.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139844
Gender: male

Re: Nauru disgrace.
Reply #138 - Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:30pm

Gordon wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:16pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:08pm:

aquascoot wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 1:54pm:

we need an immigration department with swagger to only allow in those who will "bring the party"

If only we had that back in the '60s.

https://thesnipertakesaim.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/abbottatuni.jpg

I hate Abbott, but has he broken a law?

Yes.

Back to top

IP Logged

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: Nauru disgrace.
Reply #139 - Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:32pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:22pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:17pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:11pm:

Valkie wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:08pm:

Quote:

Incorrect.

You are attempting to enter Australia as an asylum seeker.

And, it's not illegal to do that.

So, if someone walked into your house and said I'm an asylum seeker,
You had no information of this person, who he was, where he was from and if he was a murderer, criminal, or rapist,
You would say.........."welcome"

I would send him or her to the Immigration Department for processing.

If he or she was then granted refugee status, I'd say "welcome".

If they weren't, I'd say "get out of here".

Where's the problem?

What about if they aren't considered a refugee but their home country (like Iran) won't take them back??

I would tell the Government to get off their arse and do their job.

No answer I see. You know where these people go PB? Nauru and Manus.

Back to top

IP Logged

Gordon

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20799
Gordon
Gender: male

Re: Nauru disgrace.
Reply #140 - Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:33pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:30pm:

Gordon wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:16pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:08pm:

aquascoot wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 1:54pm:

we need an immigration department with swagger to only allow in those who will "bring the party"

If only we had that back in the '60s.

https://thesnipertakesaim.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/abbottatuni.jpg

I hate Abbott, but has he broken a law?

Yes.

As much as you want it to be, being in the Liberal Party isn't against the law Cheesy

Back to top

IBI

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139844
Gender: male

Re: Nauru disgrace.
Reply #141 - Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:34pm

Gordon wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:16pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:08pm:

aquascoot wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 1:54pm:

we need an immigration department with swagger to only allow in those who will "bring the party"

If only we had that back in the '60s.

https://thesnipertakesaim.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/abbottatuni.jpg

I hate Abbott, but has he broken a law?

Indecent assault.

1978

The offence was proven.

So, yes: he has broken the law (at least once).

Back to top

IP Logged

rhino

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17179
Gender: male

Re: Nauru disgrace.
Reply #142 - Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:36pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:11pm:

Valkie wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:08pm:

Quote:

Incorrect.

You are attempting to enter Australia as an asylum seeker.

And, it's not illegal to do that.

So, if someone walked into your house and said I'm an asylum seeker,
You had no information of this person, who he was, where he was from and if he was a murderer, criminal, or rapist,
You would say.........."welcome"

I would send him or her to the Immigration Department for processing.

What if they dont go to the immigration department mastermind. You going to put them in a box and send them?

Back to top

IP Logged

rhino

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 17179
Gender: male

Re: Nauru disgrace.
Reply #143 - Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:38pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:34pm:

Gordon wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:16pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:08pm:

aquascoot wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 1:54pm:

we need an immigration department with swagger to only allow in those who will "bring the party"

If only we had that back in the '60s.

https://thesnipertakesaim.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/abbottatuni.jpg

I hate Abbott, but has he broken a law?

Indecent assault.

1978

The offence was proven.

So, yes: he has broken the law (at least once).

he plead noy guilty and the charge was dismissed. your legal skills are on par with Ozzys. Grin

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139844
Gender: male

Re: Nauru disgrace.
Reply #144 - Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:39pm

Gordon wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:33pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:30pm:

Gordon wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:16pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:08pm:

aquascoot wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 1:54pm:

we need an immigration department with swagger to only allow in those who will "bring the party"

If only we had that back in the '60s.

https://thesnipertakesaim.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/abbottatuni.jpg

I hate Abbott, but has he broken a law?

Yes.

As much as you want it to be, being in the Liberal Party isn't against the law Cheesy

Indecent assault.

1978

The offence was proven.

So, yes: he has broken the law (at least once).

Back to top

IP Logged

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: Nauru disgrace.
Reply #145 - Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:40pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:34pm:

Gordon wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:16pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:08pm:

aquascoot wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 1:54pm:

we need an immigration department with swagger to only allow in those who will "bring the party"

If only we had that back in the '60s.

https://thesnipertakesaim.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/abbottatuni.jpg

I hate Abbott, but has he broken a law?

Indecent assault.

1978

The offence was proven.

So, yes: he has broken the law (at least once).

So if you aren't convicted so doesn't that mean in the eyes of the law he's innocent?

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139844
Gender: male

Re: Nauru disgrace.
Reply #146 - Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:40pm

rhino wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:38pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:34pm:

Gordon wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:16pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:08pm:

aquascoot wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 1:54pm:

we need an immigration department with swagger to only allow in those who will "bring the party"

If only we had that back in the '60s.

https://thesnipertakesaim.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/abbottatuni.jpg

I hate Abbott, but has he broken a law?

Indecent assault.

1978

The offence was proven.

So, yes: he has broken the law (at least once).

he plead noy guilty and the charge was dismissed. your legal skills are on par with Ozzys.

The offence was proven.

Your ignorance is excused.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 139844
Gender: male

Re: Nauru disgrace.
Reply #147 - Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:42pm

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:40pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:34pm:

Gordon wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:16pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:08pm:

aquascoot wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 1:54pm:

we need an immigration department with swagger to only allow in those who will "bring the party"

If only we had that back in the '60s.

https://thesnipertakesaim.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/abbottatuni.jpg

I hate Abbott, but has he broken a law?

Indecent assault.

1978

The offence was proven.

So, yes: he has broken the law (at least once).

So if you aren't convicted so doesn't that mean in the eyes of the law he's innocent?

The offence was proven.

That means that in the eyes of the court, he broke the law.

So, the answer to the original question is "yes" - he has broken the law (at least once, that we know of).

EDIT: twice.

He also damaged public property.

Back to top

IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35260
Gender: male

Re: Nauru disgrace.
Reply #148 - Aug 12^th, 2016 at 4:28pm

Gordon wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:13pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:11pm:

Gordon wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:06pm:

Left or right?

What nationality and religion Gordon??

Paki Muz. He burnt his shop down for the insurance money and killed three people, including a baby.

you'd definitely get tossed out of the club if you did that.

Back to top

IP Logged

Mr Hammer

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 25212
Gender: male

Re: Nauru disgrace.
Reply #149 - Aug 12^th, 2016 at 4:33pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:42pm:

Mr Hammer wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:40pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:34pm:

Gordon wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:16pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:08pm:

aquascoot wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 1:54pm:

we need an immigration department with swagger to only allow in those who will "bring the party"

If only we had that back in the '60s.

https://thesnipertakesaim.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/abbottatuni.jpg

I hate Abbott, but has he broken a law?

Indecent assault.

1978

The offence was proven.

So, yes: he has broken the law (at least once).

So if you aren't convicted so doesn't that mean in the eyes of the law he's innocent?

The offence was proven.

That means that in the eyes of the court, he broke the law.

So, the answer to the original question is "yes" - he has broken the law (at least once, that we know of).

EDIT: twice.

He also damaged public property.

Proven by who??? The only proven that matters is the courts. NEXT!!

Back to top

IP Logged