Australian Politics Forum - FEMALE GMOD REQUIRED ON OZPOL ASAP!

Aussie Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 38865 Gender:	Re: FEMALE GMOD REQUIRED ON OZPOL ASAP! Reply #150 - Aug 12^th, 2016 at 4:31pm So much in that I could comment upon, but I'll stay out of it other than: Quote: [I know at least we can read it] No, we can't.
Back to top	IP Logged

Vic

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 8314
Melbourne Victoria
Gender: male

Re:
Reply #151 - Aug 12^th, 2016 at 4:32pm

Quote:

If I may answer part of that. There is an area that is set aside for Gmoderators. It's sole use is to advise the other GMs who they have suspended, for how long, and the evidence they have used to come to their decision. There is also an 'aide memoir' if you like that sets out how moderators should conduct them selves when dealing with potential suspensions. In my case, I save everything from postings, links and emails in a folder so that my reasons for suspension are there for all to see and judge my fairness.

The reason for this is understandable. Moderators come and go over the course of the day and if suspensions are not known then "unsuspending" may not occur. This may mean someone may be left suspended indefinately.
If there is a secret room, war room, or anything of the like, I have not found it

Back to top

Football, Meat Pies, Kangaroos and Liberal Lies
Football, Meat Pies, Kangaroos and Liberal Lies

IP Logged

Aussie Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 38865 Gender:	Re: FEMALE GMOD REQUIRED ON OZPOL ASAP! Reply #152 - Aug 12^th, 2016 at 4:36pm Quote: ....emails...... Do you mean PMs?
Back to top	IP Logged

Redmond Neck

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 21739
ACT
Gender: male

Re: FEMALE GMOD REQUIRED ON OZPOL ASAP!
Reply #153 - Aug 12^th, 2016 at 4:54pm

Black Orchid wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 3:02pm:

cods wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 2:11pm:

hummmmm are you saying that they tried to have one instated???....how do you know that???>...I havent even seen the list of people that nominated...

where do you find out all this stuff???...

They didn't. As far as I know, no-one from PA nominated themselves, I certainly didn't. I did, in fact, put forth a nomination but it wasn't anyone from PA. It nominated Issuevoter. Whether or not he was given the opportunity to nominate himself, I have no idea, but this nonsense is purely unfounded hysterics.

The way I see it, a GMod needs to be able to put themselves above the chaos. Some will warn and watch those they don't like in the hope they will slip up so they can pounce. Others will swing too far the other way and ignore indiscretions because they know they will be accused of being biased.

The perfect position is in the middle and I don't honestly think there are many who can achieve that balance. Either way they still have to follow, and be happy with, the path Freediver has set.

WHAT !!!!!

I thought you told me a hundred posts was required, I am over that surely?

Back to top

BAN ALL THESE ABO SITES RECOGNITIONS.

ALL AUSTRALIA IS FOR ALL AUSTRALIANS!

IP Logged

Redmond Neck Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 21739 ACT Gender:	Re: FEMALE GMOD REQUIRED ON OZPOL ASAP! Reply #154 - Aug 12^th, 2016 at 4:57pm That reply was for skippy I must have clicked the wrong reply and now cant edit sorry!
Back to top	BAN ALL THESE ABO SITES RECOGNITIONS. ALL AUSTRALIA IS FOR ALL AUSTRALIANS! IP Logged

Black Orchid

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 5813
Gender: female

Re: FEMALE GMOD REQUIRED ON OZPOL ASAP!
Reply #155 - Aug 12^th, 2016 at 5:13pm

cods wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 4:22pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 3:02pm:

They didn't. As far as I know, no-one from PA nominated themselves, I certainly didn't. I did, in fact, put forth a nomination but it wasn't anyone from PA. It nominated Issuevoter. Whether or not he was given the opportunity to nominate himself, I have no idea, but this nonsense is purely unfounded hysterics.

can I ask you a question you do not have to answer of course..

but being a member of both forums..which site do you honestly think is the better run...they both have different rules and even elections... they both have secret rooms or a place where only the chosen ones can contribute...[I know at least we can read it].. Roll Eyes

the point is...

why the secrecy???...why the need for that?...if it involves people talking about others behind their backs

is that a nice thing to encourage..??..

it also encourages paranoia you could all be talking about the Bachelor but there are those that will think you are scheming all sorts of nasty things...its human nature...

as I say WHY THE NEED.?..I see it as a POWER thing...and not a nice way to use POWER...

not holding you responsible skippy as I know fd is in full control...

as a member bo and I presume a chosen one who can access secret room.......do you honestly think its fair?..

now I know there are folks who rant and rave and maybe spoil things.. I dont know .. but they can get sent to siberia for a spell and as we are told forever...so what is the NEED for having this secret place??...

I myself prefer openness....

but I am ok with some things as long as i understand the NEED....

Cods it is just like a tea room at work where you sit and chatter. There is nothing sinister about it.

When I used to use Yahoo Chat rooms a few of us always congregated on PM in a conference and chatted above the fray. I see nothing wrong with that.

If people are excluded it is by their own doing. There is no secret handshake but if it is abused, subsequent inclusion is limited. I have no problem with that either.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38865
Gender: male

Re: FEMALE GMOD REQUIRED ON OZPOL ASAP!
Reply #156 - Aug 12^th, 2016 at 5:15pm

Quote:

Cods it is just like a tea room at work where you sit and chatter. There is nothing sinister about it.

When I used to use Yahoo Chat rooms a few of us always congregated on PM in a conference and chatted above the fray. I see nothing wrong with that.

If people are excluded it by their own doing.

Rubbish. Newbies of excellent behaviour are excluded from it as lesser beings.

Back to top

IP Logged

Black Orchid Gold Member Offline Posts: 5813 Gender:	Re: FEMALE GMOD REQUIRED ON OZPOL ASAP! Reply #157 - Aug 12^th, 2016 at 5:17pm Boo Hoo!!
Back to top	IP Logged

Neferti

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 7965
Canberra
Gender: female

Re: FEMALE GMOD REQUIRED ON OZPOL ASAP!
Reply #158 - Aug 12^th, 2016 at 5:26pm

Aussie wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 5:15pm:

Quote:

Cods it is just like a tea room at work where you sit and chatter. There is nothing sinister about it.

When I used to use Yahoo Chat rooms a few of us always congregated on PM in a conference and chatted above the fray. I see nothing wrong with that.

If people are excluded it by their own doing.

Rubbish. Newbies of excellent behaviour are excluded from it as lesser beings.

How would you know? You reckon you never go there. Roll Eyes

Most "newbies" are very obviously socks of permanently banned Members. Cry

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38865
Gender: male

Re: FEMALE GMOD REQUIRED ON OZPOL ASAP!
Reply #159 - Aug 12^th, 2016 at 5:31pm

Neferti wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 5:26pm:

Aussie wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 5:15pm:

Quote:

Cods it is just like a tea room at work where you sit and chatter. There is nothing sinister about it.

When I used to use Yahoo Chat rooms a few of us always congregated on PM in a conference and chatted above the fray. I see nothing wrong with that.

If people are excluded it by their own doing.

Rubbish. Newbies of excellent behaviour are excluded from it as lesser beings.

How would you know? You reckon you never go there. Roll Eyes

Most "newbies" are very obviously socks of permanently banned Members. Cry

Because that is the truth, confirmed by Redmond Neck here this afternoon, and it shines the 'bullshit' torch on BO's absurd claim.

Back to top

IP Logged

cods

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 88048

Re: FEMALE GMOD REQUIRED ON OZPOL ASAP!
Reply #160 - Aug 12^th, 2016 at 5:45pm

they both have different rules and even elections... they both have secret rooms or a place where only the chosen ones can contribute...[I know at least we can read it].. Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

just clarifying my post....

the place ONLY THE CHOSEN ONES CAN CONTRIBUTE is of course feedback on ozpol....

where I can read but not post....messages are sent to the chosen ones... knowing only they can reply...

so there is nothing subtle about it..

at least at PA>. members are told they have to make 300 posts...before they can use it... by that I resume it means post in there....could that be like a car warranty 300 posts or 5 years which ever comes first...

Grin

I am having a lend..

Black Orchid wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 5:13pm:

Cods it is just like a tea room at work where you sit and chatter. There is nothing sinister about it.

When I used to use Yahoo Chat rooms a few of us always congregated on PM in a conference and chatted above the fray. I see nothing wrong with that.

If people are excluded it is by their own doing. There is no secret handshake but if it is abused, subsequent inclusion is limited. I have no problem with that either.

my experience of tea/lunch rooms was waiting for someone to go on holiday so the rest could all gossip about her over their cheese sarnies....... Wink

Back to top

IP Logged

Neferti

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 7965
Canberra
Gender: female

Re: FEMALE GMOD REQUIRED ON OZPOL ASAP!
Reply #161 - Aug 12^th, 2016 at 5:45pm

Aussie wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 5:31pm:

Neferti wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 5:26pm:

Aussie wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 5:15pm:

Quote:

Cods it is just like a tea room at work where you sit and chatter. There is nothing sinister about it.

When I used to use Yahoo Chat rooms a few of us always congregated on PM in a conference and chatted above the fray. I see nothing wrong with that.

If people are excluded it by their own doing.

Rubbish. Newbies of excellent behaviour are excluded from it as lesser beings.

How would you know? You reckon you never go there. Roll Eyes

Most "newbies" are very obviously socks of permanently banned Members. Cry

Because that is the truth, confirmed by Redmond Neck here this afternoon, and it shines the 'bullshit' torch on BO's absurd claim.

You wouldn't know the truth if it hit you in the face.

Redneck has it arse up with care. He didn't confirm anything. He usually only goes there when he gets a holiday from here. He has his very own thread in Off Topic called Holiday from OzPol.

Back to top

IP Logged

Aussie

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 38865
Gender: male

Re: FEMALE GMOD REQUIRED ON OZPOL ASAP!
Reply #162 - Aug 12^th, 2016 at 5:52pm

Neferti wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 5:45pm:

Aussie wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 5:31pm:

Neferti wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 5:26pm:

Aussie wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 5:15pm:

Quote:

Cods it is just like a tea room at work where you sit and chatter. There is nothing sinister about it.

When I used to use Yahoo Chat rooms a few of us always congregated on PM in a conference and chatted above the fray. I see nothing wrong with that.

If people are excluded it by their own doing.

Rubbish. Newbies of excellent behaviour are excluded from it as lesser beings.

How would you know? You reckon you never go there. Roll Eyes

Most "newbies" are very obviously socks of permanently banned Members. Cry

Because that is the truth, confirmed by Redmond Neck here this afternoon, and it shines the 'bullshit' torch on BO's absurd claim.

You wouldn't know the truth if it hit you in the face.

Redneck has it arse up with care. He didn't confirm anything. He usually only goes there when he gets a holiday from here. He has his very own thread in Off Topic called Holiday from OzPol.

Are you trying to tell me that a New Member over there will be given the password to the Secret Confidential Room? Really?

Back to top

IP Logged

Its time

Gold Member

Offline

Boot libs out

Posts: 25639
Gender: female

Re: FEMALE GMOD REQUIRED ON OZPOL ASAP!
Reply #163 - Aug 12^th, 2016 at 5:55pm

Neferti wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 5:45pm:

Aussie wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 5:31pm:

Neferti wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 5:26pm:

Aussie wrote on Aug 12^th, 2016 at 5:15pm:

Quote:

Cods it is just like a tea room at work where you sit and chatter. There is nothing sinister about it.

When I used to use Yahoo Chat rooms a few of us always congregated on PM in a conference and chatted above the fray. I see nothing wrong with that.

If people are excluded it by their own doing.

Rubbish. Newbies of excellent behaviour are excluded from it as lesser beings.

How would you know? You reckon you never go there. Roll Eyes

Most "newbies" are very obviously socks of permanently banned Members. Cry

Because that is the truth, confirmed by Redmond Neck here this afternoon, and it shines the 'bullshit' torch on BO's absurd claim.

You wouldn't know the truth if it hit you in the face.

Redneck has it arse up with care. He didn't confirm anything. He usually only goes there when he gets a holiday from here. He has his very own thread in Off Topic called Holiday from OzPol.

Did you want me to check i can still post on feedback Wink

Back to top

IP Logged

Redmond Neck Gold Member Offline OzPolitic Posts: 21739 ACT Gender:	Re: FEMALE GMOD REQUIRED ON OZPOL ASAP! Reply #164 - Aug 12^th, 2016 at 5:58pm Actually I have been a fairly regular contributor over there following my last banning.
Back to top	BAN ALL THESE ABO SITES RECOGNITIONS. ALL AUSTRALIA IS FOR ALL AUSTRALIANS! IP Logged