You identify opposition and rejection as persecution.

That's just you being stupid on purpose.

Brian Ross wrote on Oct 1^st, 2016 at 11:57pm:



Tell us what differentiates persecution from opposition and rejection so we will know not to persecute but only oppose and reject.



Is opposing and rejecting every minute of the day makes us persecutors? Do we have to stop opposing and rejecting 12 hours out of every 24?

You are thicker and stupider than we thought. (And that's something you could crow about, our little over-archiever).

Brian Ross wrote on Oct 3^rd, 2016 at 10:46pm:



Really??

So if I were to be critical of, say, Trump on every thread he is mentioned in I would be persecuting Trump. Especially since I have never met him.

Your brain is truly addled.

Brian Ross wrote on Oct 4^th, 2016 at 6:17pm:



You stupid man. being critical of Trump is not persecution, being critical of Islam is persecution of Muslim.

You are an idiot and you have been shown up as an idiot once again. That's why you are gesturing for a facial as you always do when you have been had.

Bob's singing about Brian.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/opinion/cartoons/bleak-gallery/image-gallery/ee8...

Brian Ross wrote on Oct 17^th, 2016 at 4:04pm:

You can roll your eyes, you can tut-tut - but you are on he side of the fascists, Brian.  And you know it. You know you are on the side of the oppressing thought-fascists.


Mr Leak's opponents are not attempting to engage him in debate; they're attempting to close down the debate. And there's no point getting in a debate with someone whose only argument is "Shut up – or else."

In that sense, the Australian "human rights" regime and the Charlie Hebdo killers are merely different points on the same continuum: They're both in the shut-up business, and they shut you up pour encourager les autres. They know that, for every cartoonist they silence, a thousand more will never peep up in the first place.

So this isn't a debate about aboriginal policy or Islamic imperialism or anything else. It's a debate about whether we're free to debate. I take the view that the Australian state, like the Canadian state, should not be in the shut-up business. And, when they are, it's they who are the issue, not you. When it's a contest between a book or cartoon, on the one hand, and, on the other, a guy who says, "You can't say that!", it's the latter who's on trial. If you're on the side that's saying "Shut up!", you're on the wrong side.





And that's you, Brian, karnal, gweg, mothra, Greens and the rest of the progs. You are all in the shut-up business.

Brian Ross wrote on Oct 18^th, 2016 at 11:07pm:


you label everyone a racist bigot. That's your way of saying that there is no valid point other than yours.


Mr Leak's opponents are not attempting to engage him in debate; they're attempting to close down the debate. And there's no point getting in a debate with someone whose only argument is "Shut up – or else."

In that sense, the Australian "human rights" regime and the Charlie Hebdo killers are merely different points on the same continuum: They're both in the shut-up business, and they shut you up pour encourager les autres. They know that, for every cartoonist they silence, a thousand more will never peep up in the first place.

So this isn't a debate about aboriginal policy or Islamic imperialism or anything else. It's a debate about whether we're free to debate. I take the view that the Australian state, like the Canadian state, should not be in the shut-up business. And, when they are, it's they who are the issue, not you. When it's a contest between a book or cartoon, on the one hand, and, on the other, a guy who says, "You can't say that!", it's the latter who's on trial. If you're on the side that's saying "Shut up!", you're on the wrong side.



You are consistently on the wrong side Brian.