Bobby. wrote on Sep 22
nd, 2016 at 6:57am:
dear master Light,
I have already explained unto thee your question.
I even used a simple analogy of a record.
Now you must answer mine - about those pesky gills.
namaste
incorrect sir bobby
first ye must rebut these proven scientific facts, of which
you have failed to do ..
the reason you have failed to rebut these facts is because you cannot ,
and then seek to skip over this lack and failure of yours to move on ... and we will , once you have rebutted these facts , of which ye have failed to do ..
let me remind you your 5th grade level answers will not suffice
you must bring evidence to refute these facts, and so you will address this evidence first which stands as unrebutted fact
1 .
Quote: In order for apes to add genes, they would have to have a genetic mechanism to generate new genes and insert them into their chromosomes.
But apes do not have any "gene generating system."
Nor do apes have a "gene insertion system."
2 . APE AND HUMAN CHROMOSOMES ARE NOT 98% IDENTICAL
BUT ARE TOO DIFFERENT FOR EVOLUTION TO EXPLAIN
Scientists in genetics and embryology are learning something new every day.
One of the things we now know is Darwinians were lying to us when they insisted that the genetic matter of apes and humans are 98% identical.
During the last 12 years, there has been a steady flow of scientific discoveries informing us that Chimpanzee and human chromosomes are so remarkably different that it is inconceivable for the ape genome to evolve into the human genome. For example:
In 2010, Nature published a scientific paper entitled "Chimpanzee and human Y chromosomes are remarkably divergent in structure and gene content." (Nature, by the way, is the most respected peer reviewed scientific journal for evolutionary genetics.)
The paper was the product of several teams of well-respected geneticists all of whom were fervent supporters of "ape to human evolution."
Nonetheless, they found that:
The human Y chromosome has twice as many genes as the Chimpanzee Y chromosome. Humans have at least 78 genes and Chimpanzees have only 37.
The Y chromosomes of Chimpanzees and humans are radically different in the arrangement of their genes.
Both of these facts make it impossible for apes to have evolved into humans because there are no genetic mechanisms that would account for the vast differences between the ape and human Y chromosomes.
Below are maps of the Chimpanzee and human Y chromosomes:
The top map is the Chimpanzee Y chromosome and the lower map is the human Y chromosome.
"Ape to human evolution" theory asserts that the Chimpanzee Y chromosome (top one) evolved into the human Y chromosome (the lower one) and few changes were necessary.
That is obviously baloney - there is no way that could have happened.
There is no genetic mechanism that could have rearranged the genes in the Chimpanzee Y chromosome to become the human Y chromosome.
The two chromosomes are so different it is like comparing the chromosomes of humans to those of chickens.
The regions of both chromosomes are color coded to identify the gene family or DNA type as follows (MSY means male specific region of the Y chromosome):
APE TO HUMAN EVOLUTION IS IMPOSSIBLE BECAUSE
APES AND HUMANS CANNOT ADD GENES TO THEIR GENOMES
The same research paper also revealed that the human Y chromosome has at least 35 more genes than the Chimpanzee Y chromosome. Below is the gene table:
The human Y chromosome has twice as many genes as the Chimpanzee Y chromosome. Humans have 41 more genes.
This means that in order for the ape Y chromosome to evolve into the human Y chromosome, apes had to add 41 genes.
In order for apes to add genes, they would have to have a genetic mechanism to generate new genes and insert them into their chromosomes.
But apes do not have any "gene generating system."
Nor do apes have a "gene insertion system."
This means that "ape to human evolution" theory is missing the genetic mechanisms necessary for evolution to actually take place.
This is ABSOLUTE CONTRADICTING EVIDENCE that proves "ape to human evolution" is impossible,