Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 ... 9
Send Topic Print
Hu-man Did Not Descend from Apes (Read 17206 times)
emucorp
New Member
*
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 34
Gender: male
Re: Hu-man Did Not Descend from Apes
Reply #60 - Sep 22nd, 2016 at 10:34am
 
Bobby. wrote on Sep 21st, 2016 at 6:46pm:
emucorp wrote on Sep 21st, 2016 at 5:04pm:
They look the same ergo they are/were the same ... is that the general idea?


Proof of a common ancestor.


*giggles"
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 102959
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Hu-man Did Not Descend from Apes
Reply #61 - Sep 22nd, 2016 at 7:45pm
 
master Light,
Quote:
incorrect sir bobby

first ye must rebut these proven scientific facts, of which

you have failed to do ..

the reason you have failed to rebut these facts is because you cannot ,



dear master Light,
True - I cannot - I am not a university graduate with qualifications in genetics.
I would also state that neither are you.
Never the less - feel free to post new scientific enquiry -
it's interesting -
however you have failed to explain why humans start out in their embryo stage with fish gills
yet we are not fish.



namaste
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Prime Minister for Canyons
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 26906
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Hu-man Did Not Descend from Apes
Reply #62 - Sep 23rd, 2016 at 12:27am
 
emucorp wrote on Sep 22nd, 2016 at 10:34am:
Bobby. wrote on Sep 21st, 2016 at 6:46pm:
emucorp wrote on Sep 21st, 2016 at 5:04pm:
They look the same ergo they are/were the same ... is that the general idea?


Proof of a common ancestor.


*giggles"



Why are you giggling
Back to top
 

In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy)
 
IP Logged
 
it_is_the_light
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Christ Light

Posts: 41434
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male
Re: Hu-man Did Not Descend from Apes
Reply #63 - Sep 23rd, 2016 at 3:16am
 
Bobby. wrote on Sep 22nd, 2016 at 7:45pm:
master Light,
Quote:
incorrect sir bobby

first ye must rebut these proven scientific facts, of which

you have failed to do ..

the reason you have failed to rebut these facts is because you cannot ,



dear master Light,
True - I cannot - I am not a university graduate with qualifications in genetics.
I would also state that neither are you.
Never the less - feel free to post new scientific enquiry -
it's interesting -
however you have failed to explain why humans start out in their embryo stage with fish gills
yet we are not fish.



namaste



many blessings sir bobby , and so

you cannot be bothered to research the strength of your theory ?

that you are the product of a monkey fish in which you fearlessly accept because ' someone told you so ' ..

this is very telling that you would not even have the care to explore your origins .. and just take anothers' theory at first glance , and because

enough fools repeat this gibberish you resign yourself to monkey fish mania believing you are the progeny of this idiotic theory of evolution ...

and now these facts I hath presented stand as unrebutted truth upon this thread

you will now agree that hu-mans did not descend from apes

this is prima facie established fact here and when you submit and understand this fact we shall move on ...

1 . Quote:
In order for apes to add genes, they would have to have a genetic mechanism to generate new genes and insert them into their chromosomes.

But apes do not have any "gene generating system."

Nor do apes have a "gene insertion system."


2 . APE AND HUMAN CHROMOSOMES ARE NOT 98% IDENTICAL

BUT ARE TOO DIFFERENT FOR EVOLUTION TO EXPLAIN

Scientists in genetics and embryology are learning something new every day.

One of the things we now know is Darwinians were lying to us when they insisted that the genetic matter of apes and humans are 98% identical.

During the last 12 years, there has been a steady flow of scientific discoveries informing us that Chimpanzee and human chromosomes are so remarkably different that it is inconceivable for the ape genome to evolve into the human genome.  For example:

In 2010, Nature published a scientific paper entitled "Chimpanzee and human Y chromosomes are remarkably divergent in structure and gene content." (Nature, by the way, is the most respected peer reviewed scientific journal for evolutionary genetics.)

The paper was the product of several teams of well-respected geneticists all of whom were fervent supporters of "ape to human evolution."

Nonetheless, they found that:

The human Y chromosome has twice as many genes as the Chimpanzee Y chromosome.  Humans have at least 78 genes and Chimpanzees have only 37.

The Y chromosomes of Chimpanzees and humans are radically different in the arrangement of their genes.

Both of these facts make it impossible for apes to have evolved into humans because there are no genetic mechanisms that would account for the vast differences between the ape and human Y chromosomes.

Below are maps of the Chimpanzee and human Y chromosomes:

...

The top map is the Chimpanzee Y chromosome and the lower map is the human Y chromosome.

"Ape to human evolution" theory asserts that the Chimpanzee Y chromosome (top one) evolved into the human Y chromosome (the lower one) and few changes were necessary.

That is obviously baloney - there is no way that could have happened. 

There is no genetic mechanism that could have rearranged the genes in the Chimpanzee Y chromosome to become the human Y chromosome.

The two chromosomes are so different it is like comparing the chromosomes of humans to those of chickens.

The regions of both chromosomes are color coded to identify the gene family or DNA type as follows (MSY means male specific region of the Y chromosome):

...

APE TO HUMAN EVOLUTION IS IMPOSSIBLE BECAUSE

APES AND HUMANS CANNOT ADD GENES TO THEIR GENOMES


The same research paper also revealed that the human Y chromosome has at least 35 more genes than the Chimpanzee Y chromosome.  Below is the gene table:

...

The human Y chromosome has twice as many genes as the Chimpanzee Y chromosome.  Humans have 41 more genes.

This means that in order for the ape Y chromosome to evolve into the human Y chromosome, apes had to add 41 genes.
In order for apes to add genes, they would have to have a genetic mechanism to generate new genes and insert them into their chromosomes.

But apes do not have any "gene generating system."

Nor do apes have a "gene insertion system."


This means that "ape to human evolution" theory is missing the genetic mechanisms necessary for evolution to actually take place.

This is ABSOLUTE CONTRADICTING EVIDENCE that proves "ape to human evolution" is impossible,

...
Back to top
« Last Edit: Sep 23rd, 2016 at 3:26am by it_is_the_light »  

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : )  ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯
it_is_the_light it_is_the_light Christ+Light Christ+Light  
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 102959
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Hu-man Did Not Descend from Apes
Reply #64 - Sep 23rd, 2016 at 7:24am
 
master Light,
Quote:
you will now agree that humans did not descend from apes



I have already agreed to that however we
have a common ancestor.

namaste
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
it_is_the_light
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Christ Light

Posts: 41434
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male
Re: Hu-man Did Not Descend from Apes
Reply #65 - Sep 23rd, 2016 at 8:22am
 
Bobby. wrote on Sep 23rd, 2016 at 7:24am:
master Light,
Quote:
you will now agree that humans did not descend from apes



I have already agreed to that however we
have a common ancestor.

namaste


how can you beleive that in the face of this new evidence ?

you still cling to old refuted belief systems even in the face of fact and

...

now this is prima facie established fact here , and for you to cling to your common ancestor theory is not logical ..

1 . Quote:
In order for apes to add genes, they would have to have a genetic mechanism to generate new genes and insert them into their chromosomes.

But apes do not have any "gene generating system."

Nor do apes have a "gene insertion system."


2 . APE AND HUMAN CHROMOSOMES ARE NOT 98% IDENTICAL

BUT ARE TOO DIFFERENT FOR EVOLUTION TO EXPLAIN

Scientists in genetics and embryology are learning something new every day.

One of the things we now know is Darwinians were lying to us when they insisted that the genetic matter of apes and humans are 98% identical.

During the last 12 years, there has been a steady flow of scientific discoveries informing us that Chimpanzee and human chromosomes are so remarkably different that it is inconceivable for the ape genome to evolve into the human genome.  For example:

In 2010, Nature published a scientific paper entitled "Chimpanzee and human Y chromosomes are remarkably divergent in structure and gene content." (Nature, by the way, is the most respected peer reviewed scientific journal for evolutionary genetics.)

The paper was the product of several teams of well-respected geneticists all of whom were fervent supporters of "ape to human evolution."

Nonetheless, they found that:

The human Y chromosome has twice as many genes as the Chimpanzee Y chromosome.  Humans have at least 78 genes and Chimpanzees have only 37.

The Y chromosomes of Chimpanzees and humans are radically different in the arrangement of their genes.

Both of these facts make it impossible for apes to have evolved into humans because there are no genetic mechanisms that would account for the vast differences between the ape and human Y chromosomes.

Below are maps of the Chimpanzee and human Y chromosomes:

...

The top map is the Chimpanzee Y chromosome and the lower map is the human Y chromosome.

"Ape to human evolution" theory asserts that the Chimpanzee Y chromosome (top one) evolved into the human Y chromosome (the lower one) and few changes were necessary.

That is obviously baloney - there is no way that could have happened. 

There is no genetic mechanism that could have rearranged the genes in the Chimpanzee Y chromosome to become the human Y chromosome.

The two chromosomes are so different it is like comparing the chromosomes of humans to those of chickens.

The regions of both chromosomes are color coded to identify the gene family or DNA type as follows (MSY means male specific region of the Y chromosome):

...

APE TO HUMAN EVOLUTION IS IMPOSSIBLE BECAUSE

APES AND HUMANS CANNOT ADD GENES TO THEIR GENOMES


The same research paper also revealed that the human Y chromosome has at least 35 more genes than the Chimpanzee Y chromosome.  Below is the gene table:

...

The human Y chromosome has twice as many genes as the Chimpanzee Y chromosome.  Humans have 41 more genes.

This means that in order for the ape Y chromosome to evolve into the human Y chromosome, apes had to add 41 genes.
In order for apes to add genes, they would have to have a genetic mechanism to generate new genes and insert them into their chromosomes.

But apes do not have any "gene generating system."

Nor do apes have a "gene insertion system."


This means that "ape to human evolution" theory is missing the genetic mechanisms necessary for evolution to actually take place.

This is ABSOLUTE CONTRADICTING EVIDENCE that proves "ape to human evolution" is impossible,

...

Back to top
 

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : )  ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯
it_is_the_light it_is_the_light Christ+Light Christ+Light  
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 102959
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Hu-man Did Not Descend from Apes
Reply #66 - Sep 23rd, 2016 at 6:39pm
 
So master Light - how did it all happen?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Baronvonrort
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 18290
Gender: male
Re: Hu-man Did Not Descend from Apes
Reply #67 - Sep 23rd, 2016 at 6:43pm
 
it_is_the_light wrote on Sep 18th, 2016 at 12:24pm:
Hu-Man aka God-Man did not descend from the apes

The Freemason ,Darwin and his foolish and non factual theory is debunked ..



Cite where Darwin said we descended from the Apes.


You have debunked nothing Marty I suggest you get off the drugs get out from under your copper frame and get a job and pay some taxes
Back to top
 

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 102959
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Hu-man Did Not Descend from Apes
Reply #68 - Sep 23rd, 2016 at 7:04pm
 
Baronvonrort wrote on Sep 23rd, 2016 at 6:43pm:
it_is_the_light wrote on Sep 18th, 2016 at 12:24pm:
Hu-Man aka God-Man did not descend from the apes

The Freemason ,Darwin and his foolish and non factual theory is debunked ..



Cite where Darwin said we descended from the Apes.


You have debunked nothing Marty I suggest you get off the drugs get out from under your copper frame and get a job and pay some taxes




forgiven

namaste


...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Baronvonrort
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 18290
Gender: male
Re: Hu-man Did Not Descend from Apes
Reply #69 - Sep 23rd, 2016 at 7:38pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Sep 23rd, 2016 at 7:04pm:
Baronvonrort wrote on Sep 23rd, 2016 at 6:43pm:
it_is_the_light wrote on Sep 18th, 2016 at 12:24pm:
Hu-Man aka God-Man did not descend from the apes

The Freemason ,Darwin and his foolish and non factual theory is debunked ..



Cite where Darwin said we descended from the Apes.


You have debunked nothing Marty I suggest you get off the drugs get out from under your copper frame and get a job and pay some taxes




forgiven

namaste


http://solidcopperpyramids.com/images/marty.jpg


I hope he declares his income from selling those fraudulent frames to Centrelink.


Back to top
 

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 102959
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Hu-man Did Not Descend from Apes
Reply #70 - Sep 23rd, 2016 at 7:45pm
 
Baronvonrort wrote on Sep 23rd, 2016 at 7:38pm:
Bobby. wrote on Sep 23rd, 2016 at 7:04pm:
Baronvonrort wrote on Sep 23rd, 2016 at 6:43pm:
it_is_the_light wrote on Sep 18th, 2016 at 12:24pm:
Hu-Man aka God-Man did not descend from the apes

The Freemason ,Darwin and his foolish and non factual theory is debunked ..



Cite where Darwin said we descended from the Apes.


You have debunked nothing Marty I suggest you get off the drugs get out from under your copper frame and get a job and pay some taxes




forgiven

namaste


http://solidcopperpyramids.com/images/marty.jpg


I hope he declares his income from selling those fraudulent frames to Centrelink.





Centrelink?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
gizmo_2655
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16010
South West NSW
Gender: male
Re: Hu-man Did Not Descend from Apes
Reply #71 - Sep 23rd, 2016 at 10:06pm
 
it_is_the_light wrote on Sep 18th, 2016 at 12:24pm:
Hu-Man aka God-Man did not descend from the apes

The Freemason ,Darwin and his foolish and non factual theory is debunked ..

https://www.thestar.com/content/dam/thestar/entertainment/2012/02/01/super_bowl_...

http://apologeticspress.org/apcontent.aspx?category=9&article=801

Of Apes and Men: Chromosome 2 in Humans and the Chimpanzee

by      Will Brooks, Ph.D.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: The following article was written by A.P. staff scientist Will Brooks, who holds a Ph.D. in Cell Biology from the University of Alabama at Birmingham.]

“The Evolution of Creationism.” No, you did not misread the statement. This was the title of a symposium that I recently attended at the Experimental Biology 2009 National Conference held in New Orleans, Louisiana (Forrest and Miller, 2009). At this symposium, a couple of the more vocal evolutionists gave a detailed account of how creationists’ thinking has allegedly “evolved” over the last 20 years. The speakers gave a chronological history of landmark court cases regarding the creation/evolution debate and marked how creationists have repeatedly changed their strategies for battling evolutionary thought. (Answering this historical interpretation is beyond the scope of this article, though much could be said in response to this claim.) One of the speakers at this symposium was Dr. Kenneth Miller, a biology professor at Brown University. Miller is a researcher and author, but is well known in large part for his testimony at the 2005 Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District trial (Kitzmiller v. Dover..., 2005). In this well-publicized court case, parents battled the Dover, Pennsylvania School Board over a statement that the school board developed to be read in 9th grade science class when evolution was taught. Led by Kitzmiller, these parents fought to have the statement removed, because it posited intelligent design as an alternative to Darwin’s theory. Within those courts, Miller gave testimony which was designed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that evolution was the only explanation for the origin of life. One of the key points of Miller’s testimony, which he kindly recounted at the symposium, regarded the then-recent report that human chromosome 2 looks like it is a fusion of two different chimpanzee chromosomes (Wienberg, et al., 1994).

Humans (Homo sapiens) have 46 chromosomes which make up their nuclear DNA genome; this number is known as the diploid number. Half of these 46 chromosomes are always donated by the mother and half by the father. So, mom and dad each contribute 23 chromosomes—the haploid number—to their offspring. Therefore, the 46 nuclear chromosomes, that all humans possess within their cells, are actually 23 pairs of identical chromosomes. (To be more precise, females have 23 identical pairs, while males have 22 pairs that are identical and the sex chromosomes, X and Y, are paired but not identical.) This diploid number of 46 (23 pairs) is, however, unique to humans among their alleged primate relatives. Genetically speaking, those species which have DNA sequences most similar to that of humans are the great apes. Each of the four species of ape (chimpanzee, gorilla, bonobo, and orangutan) possesses 48 chromosomes or 24 pairs, compared to the 46 chromosomes of humans. However, the genetic difference between Homo sapiens and their alleged primate relatives is significant.



No, they didn't, of course no one (except religious idiots) has ever actually said they did. BOTH man and apes evolved from a common ancestor.
Back to top
 

"I just get sick of people who place a label on someone else with their own definition.

It's similar to a strawman fallacy"
Bobbythebat
 
IP Logged
 
it_is_the_light
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Christ Light

Posts: 41434
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male
Re: Hu-man Did Not Descend from Apes
Reply #72 - Sep 23rd, 2016 at 10:33pm
 
gizmo_2655 wrote on Sep 23rd, 2016 at 10:06pm:
No, they didn't, of course no one (except religious idiots) has ever actually said they did. BOTH man and apes evolved from a common ancestor.





well go right ahead gizmo

prove your theory .. yet first step up and bring your evidence to counter these facts presented

for as it stands now this is prima facie unrebutted fact

http://www.darwinconspiracy.com/

APE AND HUMAN CHROMOSOMES ARE NOT 98% IDENTICAL

BUT ARE TOO DIFFERENT FOR EVOLUTION TO EXPLAIN

Scientists in genetics and embryology are learning something new every day.

One of the things we now know is Darwinians were lying to us when they insisted that the genetic matter of apes and humans are 98% identical.

During the last 12 years, there has been a steady flow of scientific discoveries informing us that Chimpanzee and human chromosomes are so remarkably different that it is inconceivable for the ape genome to evolve into the human genome.  For example:

In 2010, Nature published a scientific paper entitled "Chimpanzee and human Y chromosomes are remarkably divergent in structure and gene content." (Nature, by the way, is the most respected peer reviewed scientific journal for evolutionary genetics.)

The paper was the product of several teams of well-respected geneticists all of whom were fervent supporters of "ape to human evolution."

Nonetheless, they found that:

The human Y chromosome has twice as many genes as the Chimpanzee Y chromosome.  Humans have at least 78 genes and Chimpanzees have only 37.

The Y chromosomes of Chimpanzees and humans are radically different in the arrangement of their genes.

Both of these facts make it impossible for apes to have evolved into humans because there are no genetic mechanisms that would account for the vast differences between the ape and human Y chromosomes.

Below are maps of the Chimpanzee and human Y chromosomes:

...

The top map is the Chimpanzee Y chromosome and the lower map is the human Y chromosome.

"Ape to human evolution" theory asserts that the Chimpanzee Y chromosome (top one) evolved into the human Y chromosome (the lower one) and few changes were necessary.

That is obviously baloney - there is no way that could have happened. 

There is no genetic mechanism that could have rearranged the genes in the Chimpanzee Y chromosome to become the human Y chromosome.

The two chromosomes are so different it is like comparing the chromosomes of humans to those of chickens.

The regions of both chromosomes are color coded to identify the gene family or DNA type as follows (MSY means male specific region of the Y chromosome):

...

APE TO HUMAN EVOLUTION IS IMPOSSIBLE BECAUSE

APES AND HUMANS CANNOT ADD GENES TO THEIR GENOMES


The same research paper also revealed that the human Y chromosome has at least 35 more genes than the Chimpanzee Y chromosome.  Below is the gene table:

...

The human Y chromosome has twice as many genes as the Chimpanzee Y chromosome.  Humans have 41 more genes.

This means that in order for the ape Y chromosome to evolve into the human Y chromosome, apes had to add 41 genes.
In order for apes to add genes, they would have to have a genetic mechanism to generate new genes and insert them into their chromosomes.

But apes do not have any "gene generating system."

Nor do apes have a "gene insertion system."


This means that "ape to human evolution" theory is missing the genetic mechanisms necessary for evolution to actually take place.

This is ABSOLUTE CONTRADICTING EVIDENCE that proves "ape to human evolution" is impossible,

...
Back to top
« Last Edit: Sep 23rd, 2016 at 10:38pm by it_is_the_light »  

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : )  ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯
it_is_the_light it_is_the_light Christ+Light Christ+Light  
IP Logged
 
it_is_the_light
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Christ Light

Posts: 41434
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male
Re: Hu-man Did Not Descend from Apes
Reply #73 - Sep 23rd, 2016 at 10:34pm
 
Bobby. wrote on Sep 23rd, 2016 at 7:04pm:
Baronvonrort wrote on Sep 23rd, 2016 at 6:43pm:
it_is_the_light wrote on Sep 18th, 2016 at 12:24pm:
Hu-Man aka God-Man did not descend from the apes

The Freemason ,Darwin and his foolish and non factual theory is debunked ..



Cite where Darwin said we descended from the Apes.


You have debunked nothing Marty I suggest you get off the drugs get out from under your copper frame and get a job and pay some taxes




forgiven

namaste


http://solidcopperpyramids.com/images/marty.jpg


and what do we have here

just feeble character assassination

the actions of the defeated , and yet

all are forgiven

namaste

- : ) =
Back to top
 

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : )  ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯
it_is_the_light it_is_the_light Christ+Light Christ+Light  
IP Logged
 
it_is_the_light
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Christ Light

Posts: 41434
The Pyramid of LIGHT
Gender: male
Re: Hu-man Did Not Descend from Apes
Reply #74 - Sep 23rd, 2016 at 10:48pm
 
.........

......
Back to top
 

ॐ May Much LOVE and CHRISTS LIGHT be upon and within us all.... namasté ▲ - : )  ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯
it_is_the_light it_is_the_light Christ+Light Christ+Light  
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 ... 9
Send Topic Print