Australian Politics Forum - The first presidential debate

cods Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 88048	Re: The first presidential debate Reply #15 - Sep 27^th, 2016 at 11:31am bogarde73 wrote on Sep 27^th, 2016 at 10:13am: I won't be watching. I've got too many other things to do. Apart from that I can't stand DJT's high-pitched voice. PS it must be going well for the Donald - the market is in bad shape this morning. I would if I could... bawahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Back to top	IP Logged

Black Orchid Gold Member Offline Posts: 5813 Gender:	Re: The first presidential debate Reply #16 - Sep 27^th, 2016 at 11:39am I am watching bits and pieces of it and in my opinion the Donald has it ALL over Hillary so far.
Back to top	IP Logged

Prime Minister for Canyons Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 26906 Canberra Gender:	Re: The first presidential debate Reply #17 - Sep 27^th, 2016 at 11:52am Just saw five minutes, strange how Trump seems to htink that not referring to something in a simplistic manner like Law and Order or Radical Islamic Terrorism somehow means that you arent interested in the subject or dont know what it is.
Back to top	In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act. No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy) IP Logged

mothra Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 35465 Gender:	Re: The first presidential debate Reply #18 - Sep 27^th, 2016 at 11:55am Black Orchid wrote on Sep 27^th, 2016 at 11:39am: I am watching bits and pieces of it and in my opinion the Donald has it ALL over Hillary so far. Are you watching the same debate as me? Hillary is wiping the floor with him.
Back to top	If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning. IP Logged

mothra Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 35465 Gender:	Re: The first presidential debate Reply #19 - Sep 27^th, 2016 at 12:08pm Trump is coming across as a pig-ignorant narcissist. Which of course he is.
Back to top	If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning. IP Logged

Unforgiven Gold Member Offline I have sinned Posts: 8879 Gender:	Re: The first presidential debate Reply #20 - Sep 27^th, 2016 at 1:13pm Rattled?
Back to top	« Last Edit: Sep 27^th, 2016 at 1:53pm by Unforgiven » “I’ll let you be in my dreams if I can be in yours” Bob Dylan IP Logged

Fuzzball

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 6381
Australia
Gender: male

Re: The first presidential debate
Reply #21 - Sep 27^th, 2016 at 1:48pm

The debate was a draw. Trump missed a few opportunities to reel her in; the email debacle, her husband’s transgressions, sexual and policy, both whilst in the Oval Office, her health, her money making under the table deals with ME countries concerning her ‘foundations’. On the whole Trump held his temper at the expense of bringing up her transgressions, so he definitely wasn’t defeated or ‘she wiped the floor with him’ as some knucklehead here posted.

The moderator (Lester Holt) was also biased in his attitude towards Trump, constantly interrupting him, and preventing him from replying to Clinton's babble, also asking questions which contained blatant falsities about his stance on the Iraq War. It is obvious that Holt is a Clinton supporter.

Back to top

Life's Journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting,
"Holy Sh!t ... What a Ride!"

IP Logged

Unforgiven

Gold Member

Offline

I have sinned

Posts: 8879
Gender: male

Re: The first presidential debate
Reply #22 - Sep 27^th, 2016 at 1:51pm

Fuzzball wrote on Sep 27^th, 2016 at 1:48pm:

The debate was a draw. Trump missed a few opportunities to reel her in; the email debacle, her husband’s transgressions, sexual and policy, both whilst in the Oval Office, her health, her money making under the table deals with ME countries concerning her ‘foundations’. On the whole Trump held his temper at the expense of bringing up her transgressions, so he definitely wasn’t defeated or ‘she wiped the floor with him’ as some knucklehead here posted.

The moderator (Lester Holt) was also biased in his attitude towards Trump, constantly interrupting him, and preventing him from replying to Clinton's babble, also asking questions which contained blatant falsities about his stance on the Iraq War. It is obvious that Holt is a Clinton supporter.

Is Fireball Spunk Lord's boyfriend?

Back to top

“I’ll let you be in my dreams if I can be in yours” Bob Dylan

IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35465
Gender: female

Re: The first presidential debate
Reply #23 - Sep 27^th, 2016 at 2:02pm

Fuzzball wrote on Sep 27^th, 2016 at 1:48pm:

The moderator (Lester Holt) was also biased in his attitude towards Trump, constantly interrupting him, and preventing him from replying to Clinton's babble, also asking questions which contained blatant falsities about his stance on the Iraq War. It is obvious that Holt is a Clinton supporter.

Trump kept speaking over the top of the moderator, not the other way round.

Fact checks have got Trump wrong or lying over a dozen times.

It was a convincing win for Clinton.

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

Fuzzball

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 6381
Australia
Gender: male

Re: The first presidential debate
Reply #24 - Sep 27^th, 2016 at 2:03pm

Unforgiven wrote on Sep 27^th, 2016 at 1:51pm:

Fuzzball wrote on Sep 27^th, 2016 at 1:48pm:

The debate was a draw. Trump missed a few opportunities to reel her in; the email debacle, her husband’s transgressions, sexual and policy, both whilst in the Oval Office, her health, her money making under the table deals with ME countries concerning her ‘foundations’. On the whole Trump held his temper at the expense of bringing up her transgressions, so he definitely wasn’t defeated or ‘she wiped the floor with him’ as some knucklehead here posted.

The moderator (Lester Holt) was also biased in his attitude towards Trump, constantly interrupting him, and preventing him from replying to Clinton's babble, also asking questions which contained blatant falsities about his stance on the Iraq War. It is obvious that Holt is a Clinton supporter.

Is Fireball Spunk Lord's boyfriend?

You’re a sad little pipsqueak. If you had half a brain you’d be dangerous, but what else can we expect from an inconsequential native……

Back to top

Life's Journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting,
"Holy Sh!t ... What a Ride!"

IP Logged

Unforgiven

Gold Member

Offline

I have sinned

Posts: 8879
Gender: male

Re: The first presidential debate
Reply #25 - Sep 27^th, 2016 at 2:05pm

Fuzzball wrote on Sep 27^th, 2016 at 2:03pm:

Unforgiven wrote on Sep 27^th, 2016 at 1:51pm:

Fuzzball wrote on Sep 27^th, 2016 at 1:48pm:

The debate was a draw. Trump missed a few opportunities to reel her in; the email debacle, her husband’s transgressions, sexual and policy, both whilst in the Oval Office, her health, her money making under the table deals with ME countries concerning her ‘foundations’. On the whole Trump held his temper at the expense of bringing up her transgressions, so he definitely wasn’t defeated or ‘she wiped the floor with him’ as some knucklehead here posted.

The moderator (Lester Holt) was also biased in his attitude towards Trump, constantly interrupting him, and preventing him from replying to Clinton's babble, also asking questions which contained blatant falsities about his stance on the Iraq War. It is obvious that Holt is a Clinton supporter.

Is Fireball Spunk Lord's boyfriend?

You’re a sad little pipsqueak. If you had half a brain you’d be dangerous, but what else can we expect from an inconsequential native……

Is that yes?

Back to top

“I’ll let you be in my dreams if I can be in yours” Bob Dylan

IP Logged

Fuzzball

Gold Member

Offline

Posts: 6381
Australia
Gender: male

Re: The first presidential debate
Reply #26 - Sep 27^th, 2016 at 2:06pm

mothra wrote on Sep 27^th, 2016 at 2:02pm:

Fuzzball wrote on Sep 27^th, 2016 at 1:48pm:

The moderator (Lester Holt) was also biased in his attitude towards Trump, constantly interrupting him, and preventing him from replying to Clinton's babble, also asking questions which contained blatant falsities about his stance on the Iraq War. It is obvious that Holt is a Clinton supporter.

Trump kept speaking over the top of the moderator, not the other way round.

Fact checks have got Trump wrong or lying over a dozen times.

It was a convincing win for Clinton.

The usual nonsense from you.

Back to top

Life's Journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting,
"Holy Sh!t ... What a Ride!"

IP Logged

Prime Minister for Canyons Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 26906 Canberra Gender:	Re: The first presidential debate Reply #27 - Sep 27^th, 2016 at 2:08pm So essentially the conclusion I've reached is who ever won depends on who you support.
Back to top	In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act. No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy) IP Logged

mothra

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 35465
Gender: female

Re: The first presidential debate
Reply #28 - Sep 27^th, 2016 at 2:08pm

Fuzzball wrote on Sep 27^th, 2016 at 2:06pm:

mothra wrote on Sep 27^th, 2016 at 2:02pm:

Fuzzball wrote on Sep 27^th, 2016 at 1:48pm:

The moderator (Lester Holt) was also biased in his attitude towards Trump, constantly interrupting him, and preventing him from replying to Clinton's babble, also asking questions which contained blatant falsities about his stance on the Iraq War. It is obvious that Holt is a Clinton supporter.

Trump kept speaking over the top of the moderator, not the other way round.

Fact checks have got Trump wrong or lying over a dozen times.

It was a convincing win for Clinton.

The usual nonsense from you.

An argument worthy of Trump himself. Grin

Back to top

If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning.

IP Logged

mothra Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 35465 Gender:	Re: The first presidential debate Reply #29 - Sep 27^th, 2016 at 2:10pm Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 27^th, 2016 at 2:08pm: So essentially the conclusion I've reached is who ever won depends on who you support. Observers are handing the win to Clinton. Overwhelmingly.
Back to top	If you can't be a good example, you have to be a horrible warning. IP Logged