One result of the debate can be predicted now with absolute certainty.
The major networks and the MSM will all call it a win for Hillary.

AiA wrote on Sep 25^th, 2016 at 11:26pm:




Very funny- both of these 2 clowns have too much baggage.

Couldn't the USA find 2 better candidates?

I won't be watching. I've got too many other things to do. Apart from that I can't stand DJT's high-pitched voice.

PS it must be going well for the Donald - the market is in bad shape this morning.

The moderator (Lester Holt) was also biased in his attitude towards Trump, constantly interrupting him, and preventing him from replying to Clinton's babble, also asking questions which contained blatant falsities about his stance on the Iraq War. It is obvious that Holt is a Clinton supporter.

Unforgiven wrote on Sep 27^th, 2016 at 1:51pm:


You’re a sad little pipsqueak. If you had half a brain you’d be dangerous, but what else can we expect from an inconsequential native……

So essentially the conclusion I've reached is who ever won depends on who you support.

I would've asked Hillary if she knew about Bill's 100's of affairs with his co workers.

mothra wrote on Sep 27^th, 2016 at 3:13pm:


Which is YOUR opinion that (as yet) the majority do not share   ...    and  ...   OMG   ...  guess what?   That's postulating! 

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 27^th, 2016 at 3:02pm:


They certainly mean more than postulating about wiping floors   

It wasn't postulation.  It was a statement of fact.

She left him looking like a disingenuous,  narcissistic little boy.

I honestly can NOT understand why any Aussie would decide to watch an American Political anything.

Don't we get enough of the local dickhead pollies without wasting our time on what goes on in the USA, UK or wherever?

WHO CARES?

Neferti wrote on Sep 27^th, 2016 at 6:59pm:




I care - imagine Trump in charge of the nuclear button?

I honestly can NOT understand why any Aussie would decide to watch an American Political anything.

Don't we get enough of the local dickhead pollies without wasting our time on what goes on in the USA, UK or wherever?

WHO CARES?

Black Orchid wrote on Sep 27^th, 2016 at 6:17pm:


So you watched 20 minutes of it and you are sticking your oar in the water?

I missed the first part but the consensus is that that was where Trump did his finest work.

By the time i tuned in he was a blathering mess...  generally agreed upon.

He shouted over the moderator,  made outrageous claims,  lied through his teeth and blew his own trumpet.

Hillary has been almost unanimously been handed the win.  It was a resounding victory.  Trump came out looking like a combative,  narcissistic imbecile.

.

THE BIG IDEA: The consensus that Donald Trump badly lost the first debate gelled overnight. Liberals predictably panned the GOP nominee’s performance on Long Island, but some of the harshest reviews are coming from conservative thought leaders who had been starting to come around.

-- Instant reaction:


Republican pollster Frank Luntz conducted a focus group of undecided voters in Pennsylvania. Sixteen said Hillary Clinton won. Five picked Trump, per CBS News.

In a Florida focus group organized by CNN, 18 of 20 undecided voters picked Clinton as the winner.

Not one of 29 undecided voters in an Ohio focus group organized by Park Street Strategies thought Trump prevailed, while 11 picked Clinton and the rest said neither. By a two-to-one margin, the group thought Clinton had the better tone and, by a three-to-one margin, they thought she came across as more knowledgeable candidate on the issues.

A CNN/ORC flash poll found that 62 percent said the Democrat won, compared to 27 percent who picked Trump. That’s on par with 2012, when Mitt Romney was seen as the winner of the first debate.

In a separate instant-poll from the Democratic firm Public Policy Polling, 51 percent said Clinton won and 40 percent picked Trump.

Eight in 10 insiders in the key battleground states thought Clinton performed better, including 57 percent of Republicans, according to the Politico Caucus survey.
Trump complains of 'defective mic' after first debate
Play Video1:42

Trump’s surrogates in the spin room were downbeat, and the candidate himself has already begun making excuses: “They gave me a defective mic,” he complained to reporters during a gaggle. “Did you notice that? My mic was defective within the room. I wonder, was that on purpose?” There was no clear problem with his microphone during the debate, Jose DelReal notes.

Trump was supposed to stop by the Nassau County Republican Committee’s watch party on his way home. He skipped it. Clinton, meanwhile, celebrated with hundreds of supporters in Westbury.

And Rudy Giuliani, a top Trump surrogate, even suggested that Trump should skip the next two debates unless he gets concessions. “If I were Donald Trump I wouldn’t participate in another debate unless I was promised that the journalist would act like a journalist and not an incorrect, ignorant fact checker,” he said.......

CONTINUED

Hillary clinton has been a lawyer before being in politics, and has been a politician for 30 years, she would know the ins and outs of debating more so than trump.

Trump has never been a politician until last year, and has had mixed results in the GOP primary debates.

I just feel that hillary has an edge over trunp.

I can be wrong on this though. Lol

The people who will put Trump in the White House don't care about who won the debate.  They are voting against regressive leftist party politics and that will get him over the line.