Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
Sorry, liberals. There's only 1 interpretation of (Read 4969 times)
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 45264
Gender: male
Re: Sorry, liberals. There's only 1 interpretation of
Reply #15 - Oct 7th, 2016 at 6:09pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Oct 5th, 2016 at 10:51pm:



There is no Christian jihad against non-Christians, Brian. Explain why that is, if you can.

Islam has current blasphemy laws and the very much alive militant concept of jihad against infidels and heretics. And it is acted out every day. Muslims persecute Christians and other non-Muslims the way you can't imagine or won't admit.

You are a fraud, a Muslim propagandist of the worst kind.

There is no dialogue with your kind because, as a Muslim, you will never countenance any error or wrong-doing by Muslim and certainly no error in the Koran or in Mohammed's conduct  - it's always the infidels.






Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 41144
Re: Sorry, liberals. There's only 1 interpretation of
Reply #16 - Oct 7th, 2016 at 6:21pm
 
Frank wrote on Oct 7th, 2016 at 6:09pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Oct 5th, 2016 at 10:51pm:



There is no Christian jihad against non-Christians, Brian. Explain why that is, if you can.


There is one, by subterfuge.  We all know the wars in the Middle East and Central Asia have been about Oil and Terrorism, yet the language spoke by many Americans is about Christianity...   Forgotten what Sarah Palin said?  Tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes

Quote:
Islam has current blasphemy laws and the very much alive militant concept of jihad against infidels and heretics. And it is acted out every day. Muslims persecute Christians and other non-Muslims the way you can't imagine or won't admit.

You are a fraud, a Muslim propagandist of the worst kind.

There is no dialogue with your kind because, as a Muslim, you will never countenance any error or wrong-doing by Muslim and certainly no error in the Koran or in Mohammed's conduct  - it's always the infidels.


Except, I am not a Muslim, Frank...

Your entire argument consists of ad hominem insults which suggests what about your inability to actually argue the issue?  Mmm?   Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Yadda
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 21676
A cat with a view
Re: Sorry, liberals. There's only 1 interpretation of
Reply #17 - Oct 7th, 2016 at 9:15pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Oct 7th, 2016 at 6:21pm:

Except, I am not a Muslim, Frank...




Quack, quack.      Waddle, waddle.


Back to top
 

"....And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
Luke 16:31
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 41144
Re: Sorry, liberals. There's only 1 interpretation of
Reply #18 - Oct 7th, 2016 at 9:24pm
 
Yadda wrote on Oct 7th, 2016 at 9:15pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Oct 7th, 2016 at 6:21pm:

Except, I am not a Muslim, Frank...




Quack, quack.      Waddle, waddle.


So, you're a apostate to Jesus Christ's teachings then, Yadda?  Quack, quack...waddle, waddle.   Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 45264
Gender: male
Re: Sorry, liberals. There's only 1 interpretation of
Reply #19 - Oct 7th, 2016 at 9:25pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Oct 7th, 2016 at 6:21pm:
Except, I am not a Muslim, Frank...




Of course you are.

Don't shirk, wear it like a badge of honour.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 45264
Gender: male
Re: Sorry, liberals. There's only 1 interpretation of
Reply #20 - Oct 7th, 2016 at 9:32pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Oct 7th, 2016 at 6:21pm:
 Forgotten what Sarah Palin said?  Tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes




Grin Grin Grin Grin

You stupid, ludicrous bastard, you!!! You are not a real person- nobody can possibly be as stupid as you!!!

"Forgotten what Sarah Palin said?  Tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes

Grin Grin Grin

Yeah, I HAVE forgotten - I didn't even notice to start with!!!  Is she speaking for anyone? What did she say???


You are a bloody caricature of the worst kind of miffed idiot. You cannot possibly be serious and real.


Have you forgotten what Goebbels said about you, Brian?? tsk, tsk....   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


You can't be real. If you are you must be mental.  You are probably mental.


Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 41144
Re: Sorry, liberals. There's only 1 interpretation of
Reply #21 - Oct 7th, 2016 at 10:24pm
 
Oh, dear, admitting your ignorance and resorting to ad hominem insults to try and cover it?  Tsk, tsk, Frank, naughty, naughty.    Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 45264
Gender: male
Re: Sorry, liberals. There's only 1 interpretation of
Reply #22 - Oct 8th, 2016 at 2:27pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Oct 7th, 2016 at 10:24pm:
Oh, dear, admitting your ignorance and resorting to ad hominem insults to try and cover it?  Tsk, tsk, Frank, naughty, naughty.    Roll Eyes Roll Eyes



Sarah Pailin was the Governor of Alaska and has been in the public sphere for decades.

I am so sorry I do not remember everything she has said over the years.  You must remember all of her utterances.

Gawd, you are a stupid git, it's painful and fascinating at the same time.



Back to the point:

There is no Christian jihad against non-Christians, Brian. Explain why that is, if you can.
Islam has current blasphemy laws and the very much alive militant concept of jihad agaist infidels and heretics. And it is acted out every day. Muslims persecute Christians and other non-Muslims the way you can't imagine or won't admit.


Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 45264
Gender: male
Re: Sorry, liberals. There's only 1 interpretation of
Reply #23 - Oct 8th, 2016 at 2:41pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Oct 7th, 2016 at 6:21pm:
Frank wrote on Oct 7th, 2016 at 6:09pm:
Islam has current blasphemy laws and the very much alive militant concept of jihad against infidels and heretics. And it is acted out every day. Muslims persecute Christians and other non-Muslims the way you can't imagine or won't admit.


You are a fraud, a Muslim propagandist of the worst kind.

There is no dialogue with your kind because, as a Muslim, you will never countenance any error or wrong-doing by Muslim and certainly no error in the Koran or in Mohammed's conduct  - it's always the infidels.


Except, I am not a Muslim, Frank...

Your entire argument consists of ad hominem insults which suggests what about your inability to actually argue the issue?  Mmm?   Roll Eyes


My entire argument is based on facts that you always ignore but which I highlighted above. You will continue to ignore it for the exact reasons I also posted above.



Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 41144
Re: Sorry, liberals. There's only 1 interpretation of
Reply #24 - Oct 8th, 2016 at 3:11pm
 
Frank wrote on Oct 8th, 2016 at 2:41pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Oct 7th, 2016 at 6:21pm:
Frank wrote on Oct 7th, 2016 at 6:09pm:
Islam has current blasphemy laws and the very much alive militant concept of jihad against infidels and heretics. And it is acted out every day. Muslims persecute Christians and other non-Muslims the way you can't imagine or won't admit.


You are a fraud, a Muslim propagandist of the worst kind.

There is no dialogue with your kind because, as a Muslim, you will never countenance any error or wrong-doing by Muslim and certainly no error in the Koran or in Mohammed's conduct  - it's always the infidels.


Except, I am not a Muslim, Frank...

Your entire argument consists of ad hominem insults which suggests what about your inability to actually argue the issue?  Mmm?   Roll Eyes


My entire argument is based on facts that you always ignore but which I highlighted above. You will continue to ignore it for the exact reasons I also posted above.


Tsk, tsk, Frank, distorting your posts again?  Naughty, naughty.    Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Your entire argument consists of ad hominem insults which suggests what about your inability to actually argue the issue?  Mmm?   Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Prime Minister for Canyons
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 26906
Canberra
Gender: male
Re: Sorry, liberals. There's only 1 interpretation of
Reply #25 - Oct 10th, 2016 at 10:21am
 
Frank wrote on Oct 7th, 2016 at 6:01pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Oct 5th, 2016 at 8:51pm:
Frank wrote on Oct 5th, 2016 at 7:25pm:
Muslims murder Muslims, Christians and others in the name of Islam every day, several times.


Some Muslims do.  Most Muslims don't.   Why do you find it hard to differentiate between the two groups, Frank?   A broad brush suits your narrative better, I take it?   Roll Eyes



Because you can't tell them apart right up to the minute when they start allahu akhbaring and killing.

Until then they are all law abiding Muslims. They they get jihad and they kill people.

You can't tell which one will turn murderous for Allah.

http://ichef-1.bbci.co.uk/news/624/cpsprodpb/1775B/production/_91319069_skittles...

That's our Muslim refugee/immigrant problem.




You know that skittles analogy is BS right
Back to top
 

In a time of universal deceit — telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

No evidence whatsoever it can be attributed to George Orwell or Eric Arthur Blair (in fact the same guy)
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 45264
Gender: male
Re: Sorry, liberals. There's only 1 interpretation of
Reply #26 - Oct 10th, 2016 at 4:51pm
 
Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Oct 10th, 2016 at 10:21am:
Frank wrote on Oct 7th, 2016 at 6:01pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Oct 5th, 2016 at 8:51pm:
Frank wrote on Oct 5th, 2016 at 7:25pm:
Muslims murder Muslims, Christians and others in the name of Islam every day, several times.


Some Muslims do.  Most Muslims don't.   Why do you find it hard to differentiate between the two groups, Frank?   A broad brush suits your narrative better, I take it?   Roll Eyes



Because you can't tell them apart right up to the minute when they start allahu akhbaring and killing.

Until then they are all law abiding Muslims. They they get jihad and they kill people.

You can't tell which one will turn murderous for Allah.

http://ichef-1.bbci.co.uk/news/624/cpsprodpb/1775B/production/_91319069_skittles...

That's our Muslim refugee/immigrant problem.




You know that skittles analogy is BS right



Explain.


The skittles analogy is prefect for the explanation of the vast majority/tiny minority conondrum we face about Muslims. We can't tell them apart until they commit an act of terror. That's not good enough.



Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 45264
Gender: male
Re: Sorry, liberals. There's only 1 interpretation of
Reply #27 - Oct 10th, 2016 at 4:52pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Oct 8th, 2016 at 3:11pm:
Frank wrote on Oct 8th, 2016 at 2:41pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Oct 7th, 2016 at 6:21pm:
Frank wrote on Oct 7th, 2016 at 6:09pm:
Islam has current blasphemy laws and the very much alive militant concept of jihad against infidels and heretics. And it is acted out every day. Muslims persecute Christians and other non-Muslims the way you can't imagine or won't admit.


You are a fraud, a Muslim propagandist of the worst kind.

There is no dialogue with your kind because, as a Muslim, you will never countenance any error or wrong-doing by Muslim and certainly no error in the Koran or in Mohammed's conduct  - it's always the infidels.


Except, I am not a Muslim, Frank...

Your entire argument consists of ad hominem insults which suggests what about your inability to actually argue the issue?  Mmm?   Roll Eyes


My entire argument is based on facts that you always ignore but which I highlighted above. You will continue to ignore it for the exact reasons I also posted above.


Tsk, tsk, Frank, distorting your posts again?  Naughty, naughty.    Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Your entire argument consists of ad hominem insults which suggests what about your inability to actually argue the issue?  Mmm?   Roll Eyes

Address the highlighted claim, Brian, don't just duck and tut-tut. Unseemly from a know-it-all like you.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 41144
Re: Sorry, liberals. There's only 1 interpretation of
Reply #28 - Oct 10th, 2016 at 5:26pm
 
Islam has no "laws".  Nations have laws.  Fool.   Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

Someone said we could not judge a person's Aboriginality on their skin colour.  Why isn't that applied in the matter of Pascoe?  Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
moses
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 6353
Re: Sorry, liberals. There's only 1 interpretation of
Reply #29 - Oct 10th, 2016 at 7:03pm
 
An extract from Understanding Islamic Law tells us

Shariah is the Islamic Law – the disciplines and principles that govern the behavior of a Muslim individual towards his or herself, family, neighbors, community, city, nation and the Muslim polity as a whole, the Ummah. Similarly Shariah governs the interactions between communities, groups and social and economic organizations. Shariah establishes the criteria by which all social actions are classified, categorized and administered within the overall governance of the state.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print