Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Trump's economics vs Hillary's economics (Read 487 times)
bogarde73
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Anti-Global & Contra Mundum

Posts: 18443
Gender: male
Trump's economics vs Hillary's economics
Oct 6th, 2016 at 2:56pm
 
The Hill:

When President Barack Obama leaves office, the national debt will be $20 trillion, over 60% of Americans will have less than $1,000 in a savings account, the U.S. will only rank 19th in the world when it comes to median wealth per adult, and over 46 million Americans will be on food stamps.

Hillary Clinton and bureaucrats on the left believe more government intervention and more restraints on the free market will solve the problem. Meanwhile, most of those on the right believe you just cut a few taxes, provide a subsidy here and there, and create a few jobs. Neither are right, luckily we actually have a businessman running for president.

Donald Trump understands the free market better than any other candidate running for President, especially Hillary Clinton.

Trump knows we live amidst economic scarcity. As a successful businessman, not a political hack, Trump knows that it’s production that actually matters, that not all jobs are created equally.

It’s not just about creating jobs or pulling a backroom deal in congress to keep a factory open in your respective congressional district, it’s about removing government from interfering with the free market and using the government to instead create and maintain a regulatory and tax environment in which private job-creators can prosper.
It also means renegotiating our horrible trade deals.

“Free Trade” must be smart trade, it must coincide with a tax system that allows American companies to have a level playing field with China, Japan and Mexico.

Trump’s tax plan will allow manufacturers to compete with other countries, and keep these jobs from going overseas or even out of business. By significantly reducing business taxes and rewarding companies that hire in America, we will transform the U.S. into the job magnet of the world, and we will never be ripped off again.

In Contrast, Hillary’s corporatist trade deals would eviscerate the U.S. middle class.
Trump also challenges the republican establishment notion that we should keep blowing up our deficit launching undeclared wars and protecting oil rich nations for pennies. He’ll use our military as a last resort and tell wealthy countries to pay their fair share, the American taxpayers are no longer their door mat.

Trump has been honest with the American people, the free market isn’t always fair, and as a real estate mogul, he knows that first hand. However, removing the chains from the free market will allow for our country to ensure that everyone who wants to work, has chance to do so. Under a President Trump, it’s American first.
Back to top
 

Know the enemies of a civil society by their public behaviour, by their fraudulent claim to be liberal-progressive, by their propensity to lie and, above all, by their attachment to authoritarianism.
 
IP Logged
 
Dsmithy70
Gold Member
*****
Offline


ire futuis vobismetipsis

Posts: 13147
Newy
Gender: male
Re: Trump's economics vs Hillary's economics
Reply #1 - Oct 6th, 2016 at 3:51pm
 
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/11/the-case-for-hillary-clinton...

Quote:
Against Donald Trump

For the third time since The Atlantic’s founding, the editors endorse a candidate for president. The case for Hillary Clinton.

Today, our position is similar to the one in which The Atlantic’s editors found themselves in 1964. We are impressed by many of the qualities of the Democratic Party’s nominee for president, even as we are exasperated by others, but we are mainly concerned with the Republican Party’s nominee, Donald J. Trump, who might be the most ostentatiously unqualified major-party candidate in the 227-year history of the American presidency.



But Trump is not a man of ideas. He is a demagogue, a xenophobe, a sexist, a know-nothing, and a liar. He is spectacularly unfit for office, and voters—the statesmen and thinkers of the ballot box—should act in defense of American democracy and elect his opponent.
Back to top
 

REBELLION is not what most people think it is.
REBELLION is when you turn off the TV & start educating & thinking for yourself.
Gavin Nascimento
 
IP Logged
 
issuevoter
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 9200
The Great State of Mind
Gender: male
Re: Trump's economics vs Hillary's economics
Reply #2 - Oct 6th, 2016 at 9:21pm
 
Trump is too scattered. He needs to ask HC why Muzlima call the USA the Great Satan, and why her government is still letting them in. And he needs to hammer that every time he gets a chance. He has been way too nice about his criticism of Islam.
Back to top
 

No political allegiance. No philosophy. No religion.
 
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 40763
Gender: male
Re: Trump's economics vs Hillary's economics
Reply #3 - Oct 7th, 2016 at 12:22am
 
Trumps Economics - Quote:
.........After interviewing more than 80 sources and devoting unprecedented resources to
valuing a single fortune,
we’re going with a figure less than half that–
$4.5 billion
, albeit still
the highest figure we’ve ever had for him
.........


http://www.forbes.com/sites/randalllane/2015/09/29/inside-the-epic-fantasy-thats...

that is in Private enterprise.
Not given as a govt job or a corrupt payment.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Oct 7th, 2016 at 12:44am by Sprintcyclist »  

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
Sprintcyclist
Gold Member
*****
Offline


OzPolitic

Posts: 40763
Gender: male
Re: Trump's economics vs Hillary's economics
Reply #4 - Oct 7th, 2016 at 12:29am
 

hillarys 'economics'

Quote:
.........(the foundation says it brought in $337 million in 2014). At the same time, Hillary Clinton became a senator from New York and was later appointed Secretary of State.

Critics alleged that Bill Clinton’s fundraising, which in many cases came from foreign billionaires who have reason to court influence in the United States government, created at the very least the perception of quid-pro-quo corruption, in which
big dollar donations to the Clinton Foundation won favorable treatment from Hillary Clinton in her roles as senator and Secretary of State
.....


http://fortune.com/2016/06/13/clinton-money-scandals/
Back to top
 

Modern Classic Right Wing
 
IP Logged
 
Marla
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Weed is my Jesus

Posts: 13669
Colorado
Gender: female
Re: Trump's economics vs Hillary's economics
Reply #5 - Oct 7th, 2016 at 1:32am
 
bogarde73 wrote on Oct 6th, 2016 at 2:56pm:
The Hill:

When President Barack Obama leaves office, the national debt will be $20 trillion, over 60% of Americans will have less than $1,000 in a savings account, the U.S. will only rank 19th in the world when it comes to median wealth per adult, and over 46 million Americans will be on food stamps.



Hooray for capitalism. The rest of that "article" is pure propaganda horseshit. No one is buying it Mr. White Guy.
Back to top
 

I know progress has no patience but something's got to give
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print